This page is published in the public domain and is uncopyrighted. Feel free to copy. See Copyleft (http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/)
This website provides information on how Atos runs its business, extracts from the Contract between the DWP and Atos including the MEDICAL CONDITIONS that mean a face to face medical assessment is not always necessary, ASSESSMENTS AND POINTS, the breaches of Contract that occurred in my case, my unsound medical report and the correspondence showing how difficult it is to obtain justice or advice.
The Government is inviting the public to submit petitions. Search epetitions.direct.gov.uk for "DWP" or "Atos" or "disabled" to list relevant petitions including Stop and review the cuts to benefits and services which are falling disproportionately on disabled people, their carers and families (http://epetitions.direct.gov.uk/petitions/20968).
Other ongoing petitions are Petition against constant vilification of sick and disabled claimants and Petition to "Sack Atos Immediately" .
The DWP occasionally consults the public http://www.dwp.gov.uk/consultations/.
I have published here the true account of my dealings to date with Atos Healthcare. You may conclude that Atos Healthcare has been negligent, neglectful and incompetent. It has been months and there is no end in sight, I hope that you will take the time to read through each letter and reply. Remember I am fortunate in that I have periods of sufficient strength that I can cope with these tasks. At times I feel like I am a modern day Sisyphus. Most patients and their carers are too ill or tired and are forced to give up the quest.
If you feel strongly, please write to or email your MP to raise your concerns with the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions. (MP email addresses: http://www.parliament.uk/mps-lords-and-offices/mps/)
When you first complete the ESA form, you should provide a cover letter requesting the name of the "qualified" healthcare professional who will review the information that you have provided. You need to know who is responsible for deciding whether a face to face meeting is necessary. You can inform the DWP that you may wish to independently check with the GMC that the individual is qualified.
You should insist that the "qualified" healthcare professional provides you in writing the medical reasons why they feel a face to face meeting is essential. You can inform the DWP that you may wish to independently check with the GMC that the medical reasons are consistent with medical best practice.
Where appropriate, you should stress to the DWP that in order for a valid assessment to be made the "qualified" healthcare professional should contact your GP and or Consultants for details. Remember you are a patient or claimant or War Pensioner. You are not a customer or client. You are not medically qualified to diagnose or assess yourself.
If you think you are entitled to the allowance you should insist that the DWP should pay the allowance immediately and not wait for the DWP to find out the name of the "qualified" healthcare professional.
It is likely you will be harassed by the Atos Healthcare appointments clerks. You should politely but firmly inform them that you are waiting for the DWP to provide you with the information you have requested. You can email Atos Healthcare Customer Relations (customer-relations@atoshealthcare.com). Keep copies of all correspondence. Never use the phone as you need to create a paper trail that could be used in the High Court.
Out of nowhere I was stuck down, revived by emergency services, admitted to hospital and then after ten days discharged. This was the first time that I had ever been seriously ill. I take debilitating medicine to tackle symptoms but the primary brain tumour has to be monitored to see how quickly it is growing. For most of my waking time it feels like I am walking around in an old fashioned diving suit complete with lead weights. This might be fine under water or for a few minutes on land, but day after day, week after week, month after month with no end in sight. It can try the patience of the most level minded and stable. All my case notes are documented in my patient history. All diligently recorded by GPs and Consultants along with XRays, CT Scans and MRI Scans. The Atos Healthcare medical practitioners involved in my case ignored and continue to ignore my medical history.
There was an initial phone call from the DWP which said not to worry. I thought at the time the comment was odd. I was terminally ill. If one must be pedantic, the Secretary for Health in a written Parliamentary answer said adults with my condition had a 12.3% chance of living five years. This is worse than the previous period when 12.6% were expected to live five years. I prefer plain English which is around 87% of adults with my condition will be dead in five years.
It is no use getting upset. You close things down. You apologise to those you have upset over the years. You sort out your Probate. If you have any energy left, which is problematic, you try and do helpful things for those less fortunate than yourself. Epicurus (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epicurus) has a lot to answer for.
Rats. Recently I had another fit and had to use again the brilliant services of the NHS ambulance and hospital emergency treatment. I am getting weaker so do not know how long I can continue with this. Hopefully there is enough here for others to use and they may be able to get the system changed for the better.
The ESA form appears. I threw it away. The nice lady from the DWP had said not to worry.
A replacement copy of the ESA form appeared with a threatening letter. When seriously ill, it is difficult to comprehend threatening letters from the state. It is a shock. A few motoring offences (£10 fine by letter) in thirty years is not a good preparation. It is easy to believe all state benefits such as access to the NHS e.g. GP, Consultants, hospitals and medicines are being taken away. As it turned out the only threat is to a piffling few quid.
Then after persistent research, true horror stories begin to surface. Patients and their carers are expected to live on a pittance and for the tiny subsistence they are given, they are expected to go through bureaucratic, legal and medical circus hoops in an ever tightening, increasingly frenetic danse macabre. To many the brown envelope has become a tangible fifth horseman of the apocalypse.
I may have misunderstood the situation. It seems to me that the state manages information very well. Little knowledge of the abuse by state organisations to the dying, the sick, the disabled and their carers airs in the popular media channels. Every negative story is countered by an escort of positive stories.
Eventually, after much self questioning, I decided, while I had strength and remained able, I would treat the DWP and their contractors as I would with any loss adjustor i.e. weasels who would do anything to avoid paying anything out. I have paid 30 years tax and NI. I assumed the word "insurance" meant something. I assumed the state could be trusted. I was wrong; caveat some excellent and honourable MPs, Lords and others.
I decided, where possible, to communicate in written form and publish extracts so that others can learn from my experience.
I am stoical to accept the decisions of a state which may decide that due to my condition I am of no further use and is not willing to provide me with assistance. It is the hypocrisy of a state to claim to provide assistance and then deny assistance by subterfuge that upsets me. Yes I am old fashioned, I believe in the honour code and I believe the state has a duty to all. People look after each other because it is right to do so. As an engineer I try and take a problem solving pragmatic approach.
You can click on a date to link to the item on this page.
2009 | ||||
1 | 12 May | Letter | From Atos Healthcare | Request for ESA50 ESA Questionnaire to be completed. |
2 | 10 June | Letter | From Atos Healthcare | Request again for ESA50 ESA Questionnaire. |
3 | 18 June | Letter | From Atos Healthcare | Request to telephone Atos. |
4 | 24 June | Letter | From Atos Healthcare | Appointment for medical assessment. |
5 | 28 June | Letter | To Atos Healthcare | Before the medical examination. |
6 | 3 July | Letter | From Atos Healthcare | Appointment for medical assessment. |
7 | 10 July | Letter | From the DWP | Asking for a medical certificate from my GP. |
8 | 29 July | Letter | To Atos Healthcare | Complaint after the medical examination. |
9 | 29 July | Letter | From the DWP | ESA payment approved, benefit of £89.90 per week. |
10 | 8 August | Letter | From Atos Healthcare | Work Focused Health Related Assessment. |
11 | 11 August | Letter | To the DWP | After assigned to Work Related Activity Group. |
12 | 11 August | To Atos Healthcare | Complaint failed to acknowledge. | |
13 | 12 August | From Atos Healthcare | Acknowledge receipt. | |
14 | 12 August | To Atos Healthcare | Request for the Independent Tier. | |
15 | 13 August | From Atos Healthcare | Refrain from sending emails. | |
16 | 13 August | Letter | From Atos Healthcare | Apologies and meaningless promises. |
17 | 14 August | Letter | From the DWP | Wrong date wrong fact. |
18 | 15 August | Letter | To the DWP | Repeat request for copy of medical report. |
19 | 16 August | Letter | From Atos Healthcare | New Highgate appointment. |
20 | 18 August | To Atos Healthcare | Request to cancel appointment. | |
21 | 18 August | From Atos Healthcare | Refusal to cancel appointment. | |
22 | 18 August | To Atos Healthcare | Indignation at refusal to cancel appointment. | |
23 | 20 August | Letter | From Atos Origin | Travel expenses cheque. |
24 | 22 September | Letter | From Atos Healthcare | Rambling apologies and more errors. |
25 | 24 September | Letter | To Atos Healthcare | Complain over new appointment. |
26 | 28 September | Letter | To Atos Healthcare | Repeat complaints request for Independent Tier. |
27 | 2 October | Letter | From JobCentrePlus | Pathways to Work appointment. |
28 | 5 October | Letter | To JobCentrePlus | Request to cancel Pathways to Work appointment. |
29 | 6 October | To Atos Healthcare | Request for progress report. | |
30 | 6 October | Letter | From Atos Healthcare | Acknowledge request. |
31 | 7 October | Letter | From Atos Healthcare | New issues more delays. |
32 | 8 October | Letter | To Atos Healthcare | Request to hear within 20 days. |
33 | 12 October | Letter | From JobCentrePlus | Pathways to Work threat bullying. |
34 | 13 October | Letter | From Atos Healthcare | Confirm FOI request forwarded. |
35 | 14 October | Phone | From JobCentrePlus | Apologies...of course did not have to attend. |
36 | 14 October | Letter | To JobCentrePlus | Confirm JCP had made mistake. |
37 | 11 November | Letter | From Atos Healthcare | More delays. Can't find ESA50. |
38 | 18 November | Letter | To Atos Healthcare | Request for names and the Independent Tier. |
39 | 25 November | Letter | From the DWP | Opinion Poll request to take part. |
40 | 25 November | Letter | To the DWP | Opinion Poll response agree on terms. |
41 | 26 November | Letter | From Atos Healthcare | More delays. Independent Tier refused. |
42 | 26 November | Letter | From the DWP | A new FOI request. Why?!? |
43 | 28 November | Letter | To the DWP | Clarify FOI request. |
2010 | ||||
44 | 8 January | Letter | From Atos Healthcare | Offer of £100 consolatory payment. |
45 | 11 January | Letter | To Atos Healthcare | Independent Tier request. |
46 | 14 January | Letter | From the DWP | FOI response. |
47 | 19 January | Letter | From Atos Healthcare | Independent Tier referral (at long last). |
48 | 20 January | Letter | To Atos Healthcare | Independent Tier referral response. |
49 | 21 January | Letter | To the DWP | FOI response and request for full information. |
50 | 23 January | Letter | From Atos Healthcare | Independent Tier does not accept evidence. |
51 | 24 January | To Atos Healthcare | Independent Tier should use NAO procedure. | |
52 | 24 January | From Atos Healthcare | Atos Healthcare email system broken. | |
53 | 25 January | From Atos Healthcare | Atos Healthcare will comply with DWP procedure. | |
54 | 27 January | From Atos Healthcare? | Does Atos try "spoof job" entrapment? | |
55 | 28 January | Letter | From Atos Healthcare | ESA50 form must be completed again, why? |
56 | 31 January | To Atos Healthcare | Request copy of original ESA50 form. | |
57 | 1 February | To Atos Healthcare | Requesting serious complaint action. | |
58 | 5 February | Phone | To DWP BDC | The DWP BDC is not aware of serious complaint. |
59 | 5 February | To Atos Healthcare | Brian Pepper, Atos Healthcare tardiness. | |
60 | 9 February | Letter | From the DWP | Changes in benefits to £91.40 per week. |
61 | 15 February | Letter | From Atos Healthcare | "Atos" Independent Tier investigations. |
62 | 22 February | Letter | To Atos Healthcare | Independent Tier convened on unsound legal basis. |
63 | 22 February | Letter | To Atos Healthcare | Complaint over new ESA50 request. |
64 | 22 February | Letter | To the DWP | Unsound medical advice and request for action. |
65 | 28 February | Letter | From Atos Healthcare | Threat to ESA50 form or lose benefits |
66 | 3 March | Letter | From Atos Healthcare | Atos believes Independent Tier legal |
67 | 4 March | To Atos Healthcare | Response and Atos breach the Contract again | |
68 | 11 March | Letter | From Atos Healthcare | Forgets that ESA85 was unsound |
69 | 19 March | Letter | From the DWP | Provides ESA50 copy and request for new ESA50 |
70 | 22 March | Letter | To the DWP | Short shrift for new ESA50 request |
71 | 24 March | To Atos Healthcare | Another complaint | |
72 | 24 March | From Atos Healthcare | Acknowledgement received within 20 minutes! | |
73 | 25 March | Letter | From Atos Healthcare | Ignores substantive points again! |
74 | 26 March | To Atos Healthcare | Further complaint | |
75 | 7 April | Letter | From the DWP FOI | Response to 21 January 2010 correspondence. |
76 | 12 April | Letter | From the DWP | DWP does not have jurisdiction over Atos. |
77 | 21 April | Letter | From the DWP FOI | Additional to 7 April letter and copy of 7 April |
78 | 28 April | Letter | From the DWP Data Protection | They retain no information. |
79 | 29 April | To Atos Healthcare | Asking for progress and where is the £100. | |
80 | 6 May | From Atos Healthcare | Confirm will pay initial £100. | |
81 | 8 May | Letter | From the DWP | Placing me in the ESA Support Group |
82 | 11 May | Letter | To the DWP | Requesting copy of medical advice and money owed. |
83 | 25 May | Letter | From Atos Healthcare | Letter and cheque of initial £100. |
84 | 26 May | Letter | From the DWP | Responding to DWP Legal Group 10 March 2010 letter. |
85 | 27 May | Letter | To the DWP | Requesting all matters be addressed. |
86 | 1 June | Letter | From the BA DSS | Certificate of Pay and Taxable Benefit etc. |
87 | 24 June | Letter | From the DWP FOI | Response |
88 | 24 June | Letter | From the DWP FOI | Response ... more |
89 | 29 July | Letter | From the DWP Chief Executive | Response following Independent Case Examiner |
90 | 29 July | IB59 | From the DWP Chief Executive | Outstanding request (not written in English) |
91 | 4 August | To the DWP Chief Executive | Response to his letter. | |
92 | 6 August | Letter | From the DWP Jobcentre Plus | Special payment of £75. |
93 | 21 August | Letter | From the DWP | Remittance Advice of £75. |
94 | 27 August | Letter | From the DWP | Acknowledge 4 August letter. |
95 | 1 September | Letter | From the DWP FOI | GMC reference and HCP definition. |
96 | 3 September | Letter | From the DWP CMMS | Claimant and customer. |
97 | 6 September | Letter | From the DWP | Review all in order |
98 | 7 September | To the DWP FOI | Response to 1 September letter. | |
99 | 9 September | Letter | From the DWP CMMS | Addressing the 14 points. |
100 | 13 September | Letter | From the DWP CMMS | Addressing the 7 September FOI email. |
101 | 13 September | Letter | From MP | Inital response from DWP CMMS. |
102 | 29 September | Letter | To DWP BDC | Response to 6 September letter. |
103 | 1 November | Letter | To DWP BDC | Informing hospital admission. |
104 | 3 November | Letter | From DWP BDC | Apologising for delay. |
2011 | ||||
105 | 8 January | Letter | From DWP BDC | Refusing to address any issue raised. |
106 | 1 February | To DWP | Requesting Darra Singh CEO DWP to review. | |
107 | 1 February | From DWP | Acknowledge receipt. | |
108 | 8 February | Letter | From the DWP | Changes in benefits to £99.85 per week. |
109 | 21 February | Letter | From DWP | Evasive answers from Matthew Nicholas, Director. |
110 | 15 March | To DWP | Response to Evasive Answers. | |
111 | 18 April | Letter | From DWP | Apology for delay claims replied to all issues. |
112 | 23 April | Letter | From the BA DSS | Certificate of Pay and Taxable Benefit etc. |
113 | 27 May | To DWP | Request Atos to cease and desist harassment. | |
114 | 25 July | Letter | From DWP | Response to email. |
115 | 31 July | To DWP | Thanks for finally agreeing to comply with Contract. | |
116 | 12 August | Letter | From DWP | Agreeing to use "claimant", Atos falsehoods, compensation. |
117 | 24 August | To DWP | Responding to their letter. | |
118 | 26 August | Letter | From DWP | Change in allowance £10 Christmas Bonus. |
119 | 9 September | Letter | From DWP | Apology for misleading information regarding Atos. |
120 | 21 September | To DWP | Accept apology. Repeat request to remove approval. | |
121 | 11 October | To DWP | Company Pension details. | |
122 | 14 October | Letter | From DWP | ESA Change in rates £99.85 + £10.00 (Christmas). |
123 | 17 October | Letter | From DWP | Company pension calculation. |
124 | 17 October | Letter | From DWP | ESA change in rates £0.00 (company pension) + £10.00 (Christmas). |
125 | 29 December | To DWP | DWP failed to pay £10.00 (Christmas). | |
2012 | ||||
126 | 3 January | Letter | From DWP | DWP computer system fault. |
127 | 9 April | Letter | From DWP | ESA is due to end! |
128 | 12 April | Letter | To DWP | Complaint about another DWP mistake. |
129 | 15 April | Phone Message | From DWP | Luton Benefits Centre is closed. |
130 | 21 April | Certificate | From BA/DSS | P60U Certificate for 2011 to 2012. |
131 | 30 April | Letter | From DWP | "...disregard any further letters we issue..." |
132 | 30 April | Letter | From DWP | Confirm ESA has ended. |
133 | 4 May | To DWP | Request confirmation still in Support Group. | |
134 | 22 May | Letter | From DWP | Confirm ESA has NOT ended. |
135 | 25 May | To DWP | Ask for investigation report. |
This letter requests the ESA50 ESA Questionnaire form to be completed.
MEDICAL SERVICES Provided on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions 0ffice address: NOTTINGHAM Atos Healtheare Summit House, Nottingham Business Park Orchard Place Nottingham NG8 6PX Reference: ... Date: 12th May 2009 WE NEED SOME INFORMATION Dear Mr B...We have sent you form ESA50 ESA QUESTIONNAIRE with the letter. This is to help us provide medical information that will assist the Department for Work and Pension (the DWP) when looking at your entitlement to benefit.
Please fill in the form so that we can see how your illness or disability affects your ability to work. Read the questions carefully. It will help us if you answer the questions as fully as possible.
The form also gives you the chance to tell us about your other health problems, including any mental health problems. We may also have to ask you to attend a medical assessment with an Approved Healthcare Professional at a later date.
Please only return the enclosed form ESA50 ESA QUESTIONNAIRE to the address at the top of this letter as soon as you can, but no later than 25th June 2009. Use the envelope we have sent you. It does not need a stamp. Please allow a few days for the form to reach us.
Medical certificates or any other documents must be sent directly to the office that deals with your claim. Do not enclose them with form ESA50.
If you want help filling in this form
You can ask someone to write down your answers for you. Ask a friend or relative to help you. Or get in touch with the office that deals with your claim. They will have a copy of the form and can go through the questions you are having trouble with over the phone. Sometimes they may be able to fill in a form for you. If they do this, they will send the form to you. You can the check, sign and send it back. They can send you a completed claim form in Braille or large print.
More information
If you want to know more about why we have sent you this form, or if you will be unable to complete the form by the required date, please contact the Jobcentre Plus office that deals with your claim. You can get the phone number by ringing 0800 0556688 and following the instructions.
Yours sincerely, Atos 0rigin Provided by Atos Origin on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions Registered Number: 1245534 Registered Address: Atos Origin IT Service UK Limited, 4 Triton Square, Regent's Place, London NW1 3HG
I ignored it as the nice lady at the DWP said not to worry. I assumed it was a mistake.
This letter ordering that the ESA50 form must be completed or benefits may be affected.
MEDICAL SERVICES Provided on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions 0ffice address: NOTTINGHAM Atos Healtheare Summit House, Nottingham Business Park Orchard Place Nottingham NG8 6PX Reference: ... Date: 10th June 2009 WE NEED YOUR REPLY URGENTLY Dear Mr B...On 12th May 2009 we sent you form ESA50 ESA QUESTIONNAIRE. We need you to fill in this form so that we can see how your illness or disability affects your ability to work. We have not yet received your completed form.
What to do now
Please fill in the form and return it to the address at the top of this letter by 25th June 2009. Your benefit may be affected if you do not return the form ESA50 by the date shown without good reason. Please allow a few days for the form to reach us.
Medical certificates of any other documents must be sent directly to the office that deals with your claim. Do not enclose them with form ESA50.
Where to get help or more information
If you want to know more about why we have sent you form ESA50, or about how to complete it, or if you will be unable to complete it by the required date, please contact Jobcentre Plus office that deals with your claim. You can get the phone number by ringing 0800 055 6688 and following the instructions.
Yours sincerely, Atos 0rigin Provided by Atos Origin on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions Registered Number: 1245534 Registered Address: Atos Origin IT Service UK Limited, 4 Triton Square, Regent's Place, London NW1 3HG
It took a couple of days as my right side was very shaky but I sent in the ESA50 form.
This letter ordering that the ESA50 form must be completed or benefits may be affected.
MEDICAL SERVICES Provided on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions Office address: Appointments Hepdesk Block2, Government Buildin Gabalfa, Cardiff CF14 4YJ Appointments help desk: 0800 2888777 if you have a textphone you can dial 18001 followed by the number shown above Reference: ... Date: 18th June 2009 Please contact us Dear Mr B...We have been asked by the Department for Work and Pensions (the DWP) to carry out a medical assessment in relation to your claim/appeal to Employment and Support Allowance/National Insurance Credits.
Please contact the appointments help desk on 0800 2888777 within two days of receipt of this letter so that we can arrange a convenient appointment for you. Our line are open from 8am to 8pm Monday to Friday and from 9am to 5 pm on Saturdays and Sundays.
Please only contact the appointments helpdesk in connection with your appointment. If you want to discuss your claim to benefit, or if you would like more information about why you need a medical assessment, please contact the office that deals with your claim.
If you have already agrees an appointment with us, please ignore this letter and keep the arranged appointment.
Yours sincerely, Atos 0rigin Provided by Atos Origin on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions Registered Number: 1245534 Registered Address: Atos Origin IT Service UK Limited, 4 Triton Square, Regent's Place, London NW1 3HG
I phoned saying I was very ill on Sunday. I told them how difficult it was to travel to Highgate. More information on this, I gave in my written evidence to the Parliamentary Inquiry. I was a little stronger a couple of days later and rang them back to make an appointment. Foolishly I thought they would be experts on my primary brain tumour and, like occupational health therapists, could give me more information on others with my medical condition and how long it would be before I could recover and get back to work. How wrong could I be?
It might help to review at this point the questions you should ask to confirm whether the individual was qualified in deciding a face to face assessment is necessary. See http://www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatoscontract.html#qualified.
This letter confirmed the appointment.
MEDICAL SERVICES Provided on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions Office address: Appointments Hepdesk Block2, Government Buildin Gabalfa, Cardiff CF14 4YJ Appointments help desk: 0800 2888777 if you have a textphone you can dial 18001 followed by the number shown above Reference: ... Date: 18th June 2009 Your appointment for a medical assessment Dear Mr B...We have been asked by the Department for Work and Pensions (the DWP) to carry out a medical assessment in relation to your claim/appeal to Employment and Support Allowance/National Insurance Credits. We have arranged an appointment for you at:
2:40pm on Thursday 9th July 2009 at: Highgate Medical Examination Centre lst Floor, 1, Elthorne Road, Upper Holloway, London N19 4ALIt is important that you attend. If you fail to attend, your benefit may be affected. If you are unable to attend, or if you need any help whilst you are at the examination centre, please inform the appointments help desk on 0800 2888777 as soon as possible.
Please only contact the appointments helpdesk in connection with your appointment. If you want to discuss your claim for benefit, or if you would like more information about why you need a medical assessment, please contact the office that deals with your claim.
Please arrive 10 minutes before your appointment time. You should bring this letter and proof of your identity with you. We have enclosed a leaflet containing important information about what to bring to the examination and how to claim expenses. We have enclosed a map and directions explaining how to get to the examination centre.
What to expect
An Approved Healthcare Professional will examine you and produce a medical report to help a decision-maker from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) when they consider your entitlement to benefit. The enclosed further information explains what will happen during your assessment.
Yours sincerely, Atos 0rigin Provided by Atos Origin on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions Registered Number: 1245534 Registered Address: Atos Origin IT Service UK Limited, 4 Triton Square, Regent's Place, London NW1 3HG
Here is the suggested journey plan that is in breech of the contract between the DWP and Atos as it is longer than 90 minutes.
MEDICAL SERVICES Provided on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions Suggested Journey Plan Date: Thursday 9th July 2009 Departure time: 12:15 Arrival time: 14:03 our appointment time: 14:40 Travel by: Walk, Bus Number of changes: 7 Journey duration: 1 hour & 48 minutes.Suggested Journey Plan
Method From Depart To Arrive Instructions Duration Walk ... 12:15pm ..., ... Avenue (opp) Walk to ..., ... Avenue (opp) 6 mins Bus ..., ... Avenue (opp) 12:21pm ..., Bus Station (adj) 12:45pm Take Arriva the Shires & Essex/... towards ... Bus Station 24 mins Walk .. Bus Station. ..., Bus Station (Stop A) Walk to ..., Bus Station (Stop A) 5mins Bus ..., Bus Station (Stop A) 12:55pm Turnpike Lane Station (Stop P) 01:35pm Take Metroline Travel/217 towards West Green (London), Turnpike Lane Bus Station 20 mins Walk Turnpike Lane Station (Stop P) Turnpike Lane Station (Stop Q) Walk to Turnpike Lane Station (Stop Q) 2 mins Bus Turnpike Lane Station (Stop Q) 01:39pm Upper Holloway, Archway Road / St John's Way (Stop N) 01:58pm Take Arriva London/41 towards Upper Holloway, Archway Station / Macdonald Rd 19 mins Walk Upper Holloway, Archway Road / St John's Way (Stop N) N19 4AL 02:03pm Walk to N19 4AL 5 mins Disclaimer
Please note that the above suggested journey plan is provided on an information basis only and should not be relied upon. We advise you to check information before you travel with the travel operator directly. Neither the Department for Work and Pensions nor Atos Origin warrant the accuracy of any data and can accept no liability in relation to the data including liability for errors or defects or for public transport delays.
Provided by Atos Origin on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions Registered Number: 1245534 Registered Address: Atos Origin IT Service UK Limited, 4 Triton Square, Regent's Place, London NW1 3HG
I phoned saying I was very ill. I told them how difficult it was to travel to Highgate. More information on this I gave in my written evidence to the Parliamentary Inquiry.
This letter was writen prior to the first assessment. In legal terms it sets the legal context for all that is to follow.
Regarding your letter dated 24 June, confirming a medical assessment arranged for 2:40pm Thursday 9 July. I have a number of questions:-
Can you advice me under which Statutory or Regulatory or other Authority you are undertaking this assessment and can you provide me with the terms of reference for the assessment?
What is the medical purpose of the assessment and what are the expected medical benefits of the assessment to the patient?
Can you confirm that the "Approved Healthcare Professional" as mentioned in your letter will have full access to the patient's medical record including the periods when emergency admitted to hospital on the 15 April, the results from the blood tests, XRays, CT Scans, MRI Scans, Echo Cardiograms, the prescriptions history including the recent changes to prescriptions and the forms and questionaires sent to the DWP and can you confirm who authorised this and confirm that human rights and doctor patient confidentiality considerations have been complied with?
Can you provide reasons why you are challenging the medical consensus of the GPs, hospital doctors and hospital consultants involved in this case to date and in particular challenging the doctor's statement in respect of ability to work?
Given that the DWP has received full information regarding the primary brain tumour and are aware that the patient is taking anti-fit medicine, has surrendered his driving licence to the DVLA and that stress such as long journeys may result in fits which in turn may require emergency admission back to hospital, what medical reasons do you have for arranging the assessment at a location that requires a roundtrip of around six (6) hours, at best, including fourteen (14) changes and six (6) bus journeys and a return in peak traffic times?
Can you confirm that the suggested journey plan, you provided, is one hundred and eight (108) minutes, and was expected to arrive thirty seven (37) minutes before the appointment, that no return journey plan was provided, and that this plan exceeds the maximum "ninety (90) minutes each way by public transport" allowed, as listed in your guidance booklet?
Do you think it is wise for a sick and vulnerable person, subject to intermittent and unpredictable periods of weakness and possible fits, to be required to carry important documents, such as a passport, through high crime areas for the extended roundtrip on public transport as you have recommended?
The need for an independent medical assessment impunes the abilities of the numerous medical practioners involved in the case so far. Can you recommend different local GPs, hospital doctors or hospital consultants that you feel are more capable and from whom I should ask for a second opinion?
Can you provide me a breakdown of the costs involved in this process?
My personal objective is to recover my strength and be able to get back to work as swiftly as I can. I have always worked in IT development. I want to do so again. I am waiting for an appointment with a neurologist to review my medication which may improve my strength and to clear me to work with computer screens full time as fits can in some cases be triggered by working with computer screens for long periods. My next appointment with the neuro surgeon is scheduled for 20 August.
I look forward to hearing from you. Thank you.
No reply was received to this letter.
Two days before the appointment on Tuesday 7th July, I received a letter rescheduling the appointment. The replacement appointment had a journey time of seventy four (74) minutes involving walking, train and tube and a waiting time of an hour. This is evidence that my letter was received and was ignored except for the journey planner point.
This letter cancelled the previous appointment, no explanation, and confirmed the new appointment.
MEDICAL SERVICES Provided on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions Office address: Appointments Hepdesk Block2, Government Buildin Gabalfa, Cardiff CF14 4YJ Appointments help desk: 0800 2888777 if you have a textphone you can dial 18001 followed by the number shown above Reference: ... Date: 3rd July 2009 Your appointment has been rescheduled Dear Mr B...As you know we need to examine you on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions (the DWP) in relation to your claim/appeal to Employment and Support Allowance/National Insurance Credits. Your appointment at 2:40pm on Thursday 9th July 2009 has been rescheduled to:
3:30pm on Friday 24th July 2009 at: Highgate Medical Examination Centre lst Floor, 1, Elthorne Road, Upper Holloway, London N19 4ALIt is important that you attend. If you fail to attend, your benefit may be affected. If you are unable to attend, or if you need any help whilst you are at the examination centre, please inform the appointments help desk on 0800 2888777 as soon as possible.
Please only contact the appointments helpdesk in connection with your appointment. If you want to discuss your claim for benefit, or if you would like more information about why you need a medical assessment, please contact the office that deals with your claim.
Please arrive 10 minutes before your appointment time. You should bring this letter and proof of your identity with you. We have enclosed a leaflet containing important information about what to bring to the examination and how to claim expenses. We have enclosed a map and directions explaining how to get to the examination centre.
What to expect
An Approved Healthcare Professional will examine you and prodcue a medical report to help a decision-maker from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) when they consider your entitlement to benefit. The enclosed further information explains what will happen during your assessment.
Yours sincerely, Atos 0rigin Provided by Atos Origin on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions Registered Number: 1245534 Registered Address: Atos Origin IT Service UK Limited, 4 Triton Square, Regent's Place, London NW1 3HG
Here is the suggested journey plan that is in breech of the contract between the DWP and Atos as it is longer than 90 minutes.
MEDICAL SERVICES Provided on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions Suggested Journey Plan Date: Friday 24th July 2009 Departure time: 13:25 Arrival time: 14:39 Your appointment time: 15:30 Travel by: Walk, Train, Underground Number of changes: 7 Journey duration: 1 hour & 14 minutes.Suggested Journey Plan
Method From Depart To Arrive Instructions Duration Walk ... 01:25pm ... Rail Station Walk to ...Rail Station 22 mins Train ... 01:47pm Tottenham Hale 02:00pm Take National Express East Anglia towards London Liverpool Street 13 mins Walk Tottenham Hale Rail Station Tottenham Hale Underground Station Walk to ..., Bus Station (Stop A) 5mins Underground Tottenham Hale Underground Station 02:05pm Euston Underground Station 02:19pm Take London Underground/Victoria towards Brixton 14 mins Walk Euston Underground Station Euston Underground Station Walk to Euston Underground Station 4 mins Underground Euston Underground Station 02:24pm Archway Underground Station 02:34pm Take London Underground/Northern towards High Barnet 10 mins Walk Archway Underground Station N19 4AL 02:39pm Walk to N19 4AL 5 mins Disclaimer
Please note that the above suggested journey plan is provided on an information basis only and should not be relied upon. We advise you to check information before you travel with the travel operator directly. Neither the Department for Work and Pensions nor Atos Origin warrant the accuracy of any data and can accept no liability in relation to the data including liability for errors or defects or for public transport delays.
Provided by Atos Origin on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions Registered Number: 1245534 Registered Address: Atos Origin IT Service UK Limited, 4 Triton Square, Regent's Place, London NW1 3HG
I was feeling very weak. I hoped someone could give me information on how long it would take before I could get to work. I was too ill to research.
This letter requested a medical certificate from my GP.
Date 10 July 2009 Dear Mr B...YOUR CLAIM FOR EMPLOYMENT AND SUPPORT ALLOWANCE
I am writing to tell you that the medical certificate that you sent us, which covers the period from 18 April 2009 to 17 July 2009 is about to run out.
Please send us another medical certificate by 18 July 2009 if you are still sick and cannot work.
If you cannot get a medical certificate, a letter from a GP or hospital may be acceptable.
If you do not send us a medical certificate a letter from a GP or hospital this will result in your payment being stopped or suspended.
You can use the envelope sent with this letter. The envelope does not need a stamp.
If you want more information please get in touch with us. Your reference number plus our address and phone number are at the top of this letter.
Yours sincerely
Ms RB..., Manager, DWP Luton BDC, Jobcentre Plus
I sent the medical certificate on 15 July 2009.
Following the medical examination I attended which was arranged for 3:30pm on Friday 24th July 2009. I would like to formally complain over the following:-
The doctor agreed that the procedure breaches medical ethics in that it was known, apriori, to be detrimental to the health of the patient nevertheless the doctor, against her best medical opinion, was obliged to comply with the procedures that you have implemented.
The doctor agreed it was obvious that, a patient with a brain tumour, who was on anti convulsion, high blood pressure and cholesterol lowering medicines which obliged the patient to rest and to visit the toilet frequently, who had been recently emergency admitted to hospital, who was waiting for an appointment to see a neurology consultant, who had surrendered his driving licence, and who was under treatment by a neuro-surgeon, was put at serious risk by the journey, involving 14 changes of train and underground and exposed to standing room only rush hour traffic on the return journey, and an extended long wait in a waiting room with other sick patients. In normal times this is bad but during a period of swine flu pandemic it is beyond belief.
It should be noted that I was exhausted for two days and only now Wednesday have I recovered the energy to write this letter.
My complaint is that the doctor was forced to operate in ways that are not in the best medical interest of the patient.
The meeting with the doctor commenced at 16:10pm and finished at 17:50. The doctor had no access to my patient history. All but ten minutes of this time were spent in me trying to remember medical events that are documented in my NHS medical patient history.
The doctor drew conclusions as to when the medical condition started. This was a surprise and a worry as the specialists who have access to all the facts have not been able to come to such a conclusion.
The medical tests were a measurement of blood pressure (high), a vision check and minor superfical muscle strength checks. This did seem to both the doctor and myself a waste of both our times.
The doctor did not disagree with the consensus of the numerous GPs, hospital doctors and consultants involved in the case. The doctor did not disagree with the ongoing doctors statement that I was sick and unable to work at this time. The doctor agreed that I needed to see a neurologist to review the medicines I am taking and to consider the adverse impact they seem to have; in particular my intermittent periods of tiredness, vision issues and ability to walk. The doctor agreed fits can be triggered by my job in IT. The doctor sympathized with me that I have waited so long and continue to wait to see a consultant.
My complaint is there is no medical benefit to me in following this procedure and that it just wastes medical resources that could be better deployed elsewhere.
The appointment should have commenced at 3:30pm. It was late and started at 16:10pm. I fail to see why an administration procedure with no medical merit cannot be run on time.
My complaint is that the appointment was late and the explanation given at the time that my case needed to be seen by a doctor was not satisfactory. This requirement was clearly known at the time the appointment was made.
The suggested journey plan you provided, meant leaving home at 01:25pm, arriving at Highgate at 02:39pm, waiting until 03:30pm when the appointment was due to start.
My complaint is that the suggested return journey plan was not provided. I left at 5:50pm and arrived home at 7:50pm. I had to stand on the underground and on the mainline train due to crowded. I was exhausted so much so that I could not eat and had to retire to bed at 8:30pm.
My complaint is that making an appointment that obliges a sick patient to undertake a process which is tiring, takes over six hours without food or rest is inhuman, uncaring and callous in operation. It is shaming that we as a society allow this abuse of sick patients to be carried out.
The government has agreed that there is a swine flu pandemic in operation. They have asked people to minimise risks especially to groups such as the sick. My complaint is that you have ignored government advice and were negligent. You should have followed the advice, reviewed appointments, cancelled or rescheduled those which put patients at increased risks.
The waiting room does not have any hand cleaning creams and the cleansing gels which are usual in doctors' surgeries and hospitals. My complaint is that you allow offices to be used that are in breach of health and safety regulations in respect of premises that routinely deal with the sick.
The waiting room has minimal facilities, not a single picture on the walls, no reading material, no TV. It is bleak with nothing of interest on the walls. It feels like patients are being punished for being ill. It is brutal, stalinist and oppressive. My complain is that the waiting room treats the sick without dignity, respect or consideration.
Your guidance booklet suggests what is acceptable as proof of identity. My NHS prescription exemption card was accepted. My complaint is that this is not listed as acceptable in your booklet. Further, forcing a sick patient to carry a passport and bank details though high crime areas especially after a long and tiring journey is against Police advice to minimise crime.
My complaint is that you have still failed to reply to my letter of the 28 June 2009 (copy attached). I assumed you did receive it as the original appointment was changed to comply with the 90 minute journey time. I ask, once again, what Statute or Regulation authorises you to treat sick people so. I am sure your implementation and interpretation are against the intent if not the detail of relevant Health and Pension related legislation.
I attach my completed travel claim form which complies with the suggested journey plan that you supplied. I look forward to receiving the cheque.
I wait for a copy of the report. Please let me know when I can expect to receive a copy of it. Can you confirm copies will be sent to my GP and my consultants at the various hospitals?
I understand there may be circumstances whether the judgement of particular GPs is open to question in respect of frequency of doctors statements. If this is suspected the BMA could be asked to investigate. A patient could be asked to visit another local doctor. I suggest a maximum of 30 minutes outgoing travel time, 30 minutes wait and 30 minutes return travel time is reasonable. In rural areas the time could be extended to allow travel to the next nearest doctors' surgery.
In circumstances where multiple doctors have agreed, such as in my case, it is a waste of the large amount of taxes and NI contributions I have paid over the years to operate such a Kaffkaesque procedure.
Finally I have no complaints about the receptionist or the doctor I saw. They worked well in difficult circumstances.
I thought there was a bitter irony in that the doctor was from the Czech Republic. Her grandfather's generation and my father's generation fought long and hard against state tyrannies. A feature of these tyrannies, to put it mildly, was to force medical practitioners to undertake procedures that were not in the best interests of patients. The "minor" infringements in the early thirties resulted eventually in Nurnberg. Tempus omnia revelat.
No reply was received to this letter.
This letter confirms that Employment and Support Allowance of £89.90 per week and that I have been placed in the Work Related Activity Group.
Date 29 July 2009
Dear Mr B...
YOUR CLAIM FOR EMPLOYMENT AND SUPPORT ALLOWANCE
A CHANGE IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND SUPPORT ALLOWANCE
We have looked at your claim again following a recent change.
From 11 July 2009 your Employment and Support Allowance will be £89.80 a week.
This is because of:
a decision on your capability for work. You have been placed in the Work Related Activity Group
Customers with potential capability for work enter the work related activity group. This means them carrying out reasonable steps to manage their condition and to help move towards the workplace by undertaking any relevant activity, which will be developed with the support and encouragement of specialist Personal Advisors. Those who have limited or no capability for work-related activity enter the support group and are not required to take part in any work related activity.
We will credit you with National Insurance contributions while claiming Employment and Support Allowance.
The attached sheet shows how we worked out your money. lf you want more information please get in touch with us. Our phone number and address are at the top of this letter.
This assessment is based on your National Insurance Contribution Record.
HOW THE MONEY WILL BE PAID
The money will be paid every two weeks while you are still entitled to Employment and Support Allowance.
Bank/Building society: ... BANK PLC ...
We also hold an account number/sort code but for security reasons they have not been included in this letter.
We will pay your Employment and Support Allowance into the above account. The first payment includes arrears of £43.72 that are due from 11 July 2009 to 22 July 2009.
PAYMENT TO YOUR BANK/BUILDING SOCIETY
These notes are about allowance payments into a bank or building society account. Please make sure you read them.
You must tell us straight away if any details about the account change. Otherwise you may not be able to get your money.
You should check the account to see how much is paid in. We will tell you if your Employment and Support allowance is going to change.
If you think the payment is wrong, you should get in touch with us straight away. We will check your payment and tell you what will happen.
If your money is due on a Bank Holiday we will pay it into the account on the last weekday before the Bank Holiday.
If the account goes overdrawn, the bank or building society may not let you take any money out of the account. Talk to the bank or building society if this happens. You should also tell us as we can change how we pay you.
If you want a full explanation of why your Employment and Support Allowance has changed, please get in touch with us. Our phone number and address are at the top of this letter.
OTHER HELP YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO
You may be entitled to other help. To find out more about this ask us for leaflet INF2 "Other help you may be entitled to".
HOUSING BENEFIT AND COUNCIL TAX BENEFIT
You could get Housing Benefit or Council Tax Benefit. Get in touch with your local council as soon as possible. If you are already getting Housing Benefit or Council Tax Benefit you should show them this letter.
If YOU WANT TO KNOW MORE ABOUT THIS DECISION OR IF YOU THINK IT iS WRONG
Please contact us and we will give an explanation. Our address and phone number are at the top of this letter. You should contact us within one month of the date of this letter, or we may not be able to consider any dispute.
WHAT HAPPENS AFTER THE DECISION IS LOOKED AT AGAIN
If the decision can be changed we will send you a new decision. If we cannot change the decision we will tell you why. You will still have the right of appeal against the decision.
HOW TO APPEAL To appeal , fill in the form in leaflet GL24 "If you think our decision is wrong". Please send it to us within one month of the date of this letter.
You can get this leaflet from your Jobcentre Plus Office. Your appeal will be heard by an independent appeal tribunal.
If the decision is wrong, the independent appeal tribunal can change it. But the independent appeal tribunal cannot:
- change the law that the decision is based on;
- pay more money than the law allows;
- check or change your contribution record.
If you disagree with our record of your contributions, please tell us at once. We will check your records and tell you the result. If you still disagree you can ask for a formal decision.
Jobcentre Plus staff work to offer a complete service through your Jobcentre. If you have an enquiry about your claim for Employment and Support Allowance you will be referred to the Decision Maker or appeals section.
PLEASE KEEP THIS LETTER FOR YOUR INFORMATION
It will help us if you have this letter when you make any enquiries or need an explanation about the decision.
How Employment and Support Allowance has been worked out
The Employment and Support Allowance Award
This payment of Employment and Support Allowance is based on your National Insurance Contribution record and any additional amount the law says you need to live on. We call this contribution-based and income related Employment and Support Allowance.
Your living expenses £64.3O Limited capability for work addition Extra Money because you are in £25.50 the Work Related Activity Group Which gives a total £89.80 Employment and Support Allowance amount Income and Benefits No income will be taken off your Employment and Support Allowance Your Employment and Support Allowance amount of £89.80 less total income of £0.00 So your entitlement is £89.80The amounts on this page apply from 16 July 2009 to 22 July 2009.
Yours sincerely
Remember it is very important to reply within one month to ask for more time if all the evidence has not yet been made available by the DWP or Atos Healthcare.
Note there is no mention of "points" and their is no explanation and medical justification for the decision. This seems to suggest to me that the Decision Maker looked at the information provided and the letters I had previously written and decided "least said the better". The key point is not the amount or that the full amount of ESA(C) was being paid, it was that Atos Healthcare recommended that I should be assigned to a "Work Related Activity Group". This alone demonstrates gross negligence on the part of Atos healthcare.
On the 7 August 2009, I wrote up my experience as a memorandum and submitted it for consideration by the House of Commons Works and Pensions Committee. It was a BBC Radio 4 program that alerted me to the inquiry.
A letter dated 8 August 2009 arrived after the 16 August informing me that Atos Healthcare wanted to conduct a Work Focused Health Related Assessment. They requested me to contact the appointments help desk within two days.
This letter was obviously a mistake as I was waiting for a response from both the DWP and Atos Healthcare. It was filed and ignored.
This is my reply to the letter dated 29 July 2009 from the DWP (see above). This letter informed me that I was to receive ESA(C) and that I had been placed in a Work Related Activity Group. No mention was made of the above correspondence. A copy of the medical report was not supplied.
Regarding your letter dated 29 July 2009, I would like to defer a decision to appeal, pending receipt of a copy of the medical report which was expected to be produced by Atos Healthcare following the appointment I attended on Friday 24th July 2009. My advisors and myself need to review this report before deciding my response.
I have formally requested a copy of the report by letter dated 29 July 2009. I have formally complained today by email that my complaints in letters dated 28 June 2009 and 29 July 2009 have neither been acknowledged within the two working days or have been responded to within the 20 working days. I accept for the 29 June 2009 letter there is still time for Atos Healthcare to meet the 20 working day deadline.
Please advise me of the complaint procedure to be followed if Atos Healthcare continues to ignore my letters of complaint, to refuse to provide me a copy of the report and refuse to pay me the travel expenses due.
Can you confirm that you are DWP Manager for my case and as such are fully responsible in law for the actions of your staff and third party contractors who you choose to employ? Assuming this is the case I would like you to provide me with all the information you hold about me and my case as you are required to do under the Data Protection Act. If you are not the person responsible can you forward this letter to the person responsible and inform me of that person's contact details.
Notwithstanding the above, without prejudice, I would like to defer any interview relating to a placement in a "Work Related Activity Group" on the grounds that it is not appropriate as I am a terminally ill claimant. In a recent (2 April 2008) written answer to a Parliamentary question, the survival rate for an adult patient diagnosed with a Primary Brain Tumour was stated by the Secretary of State for Health as twelve (12.3) percent survive five years e.g 87.7% will be dead within five years. If you believe I do not qualify as a terminally ill patient please provide me with the guidelines you apply. My advisors may decide to test this in law.
Notwithstanding the above, without prejudice, I would like to defer any interview relating to a placement in a "Work Related Activity Group" on the grounds that I am so sick or disabled that the interview would be of no assistance. My tumour is progressive. This is as good as it gets unless and until I have brain surgery and or radio-therapy. I have been subject to fits which I am told can be triggered by excessive use of working with a computer screen. As an IT manager, for years, I used to spend twelve hours a day on the computer screen, now I can only work a few hours before my body tells me to stop for a rest. After a couple of hours I am able to work again. I have periods of extreme weakness. I can walk locally but have to rest on benches for around 10 minutes before I can go on. I have intermittent vision issues. I surrendered my driving licence. I was exhausted for four days when you forced me to go to Highgate for the medical appointment.
Appointment scheduled for 3:30pm (but was forty minutes late and started at 4:10pm) on Friday 24th July 2009 at Highgate Medical Examination Centre, 1st Floor, 1 Elthorne Road, Upper Holloway, London N19 4AL.
I would like to complain that you have failed to either acknowledge my letter of complaint dated 28 June 2009, within two working days and you failed to reply to this letter. A reasonable person would conclude that you did receive this letter as you took action over item 6. This item pointed out that your suggested journey time of 108 minutes was outside the maximum allowed journey time of 90 minutes. I would like this complaint to be referred to The Independent Tier.
Further, I would like to complain that you have failed to acknowledge my letter of complaint dated 29 July 2009 within the two working days. I accept the twenty working days for you to respond have not yet expired. Please note I still have not received the medical report which I would like my GP, Neurologist and Neuro surgeon to review. I presume I need this to decide whether I will appeal any decision the DWP might make. I would be happy to receive the report in electronic form. Please note I still have not received my travel expenses.
I attach copies of the letters. I can provide you with an electronic image of my travel expenses claim.
Thank you for your email below. On the 10th August 2009, Customer Relations received your letters dated 28th June 2009 addressed to Medical Services in Cardiff and 29th July 2009 addressed to Highgate Medical Examination Centre. Unfortunately there was no indication on the letters where they had been forwarded from.
We acknowledged receipt of these letters on the 10th August 2009. An acknowledgement letter and a copy of our Comments, Complaint and Suggestions booklet was sent to your home address the same day. As advised in the acknowledgement letter, we will now conduct a full investigation into the issues that you have raised, along with why your initial correspondence was not addressed sooner. We aim to complete our investigation within 20 working days and as soon as we have all the information we require, we will write out to you with our findings.
In your email below, you make a request for your complaint to be referred to the Independent Tier. I would advise that a referral to the Independent Tier at this stage is not possible until your complaint has been investigated through the stages of Customer Relations' complaints process, as explained in the Comments, Complaints and Suggestions booklet.
With regard to your travel expenses, your original claim form was enclosed with the letters which were sent to our office. As advised in our acknowledgement letter, we have forwarded your claim form to our office in Nottingham for them to authorise and arrange payment.
With reference to my letter of complaint dated 28th June 2009. Your Customer Relations Manager did not acknowledge the complaint within 2 days. This Manager apparently operating in line with your complaints procedure, within the 20 working days, took action on item 6 and sent out a letter dated 3rd July resolving this item but failed to respond to me on any of the other items or even to contact me and send me a copy of the complaints booklet. I have no knowledge whether the Customer Relations Manager arranged for a senior manager to personally review the investigation. The 20 working days ended in July which by definition means the investigations undertaken by Atos Healthcare on this matter were complete. I would like my letter of complaint dated 28th June 2009 to be immediately referred to The Independent Tier. I would like them to review your actions in this matter.
With reference to my letter of complaint dated 29 July 2009, I expect to receive your written response by the 27 August 2009 which is the date 20 working days expired. I take your email dated 12 August as a belated acknowledgment that you have received my complaint and are investigating. After the 27 August 2009 my advisors and myself will consider whether this second complaint should also be referred to The Independent Tier.
I have no complaint relating to 10 August 2009. I have not raised any new issues. A correction to your email, on the 10 August 2009 you received copies of letters that you have previously received.
In summary your investigations relating to matters related to my letter of complaint dated 28th June 2009 have been concluded by you and now should be referred to The Independent Tier. Your investigations relating to matters raised in my letter of complaint dated 29 July 2009 are ongoing by you.
As a point of information I have still not received my travel expenses.
I hope the above clarifies matters and is in line with your understanding of the situation. I would be pleased to discuss further. I look forward to hearing from The Independent Tier on the 28 June 2009 matter and from you on the 29 July 2009 matter.
I am sorry that you feel your letters (dated 28 June and 29 July) have not been acknowledged in an appropriate timescale.
As Ms B... explained, your letters were not received in the Customer Relation Team offices until 10th August and she acknowledged them immediately. I am afraid that I am unable explain why they were not delivered to our offices to investigate until the 10th August.
I can advise that Ms B... is currently investigating your complaint and will address all the issues you have raised in her response.
I would be grateful if you would refrain from sending any further emails enquiring about her progress to allow Ms B... time to conduct her investigation and obtain all the relevant information she requires as she will be unable to respond to each individual email.
This phrase "refrain from sending any further emails" seems to me a clear example of the bullying and abuse of the dying, the sick, the disabled and their carers that can be expected from Atos Healthcare. Where do they hire and train these brutes? Many senior management courses suggest organisations reflect their leaders. Does this culture of bullying and mismanagement accurately reflect the wills of Mark Bounds, Atos Healthcare Managing Director, Nigel Beverley, Head of Health UK and David Wright, Chief Medical Officer?
This letter was dated 10 August 2009 but the postmark date was some days after the above emails. Now if I had doubts as to the honesty of Atos Healthcare, I would suspect this is an attempt to manipulate the paper and email trail in anticipation of future legal action.
Thank you for your letters dated 28th June 2009 addressed to Medical Services in Cardiff, and 29th July 2009 addressed to Highgate Medical Examination Centre. Your letters have been received in our office today.
l would like to begin by offering our sincere apologies that your letters have not been addressed sooner. Usually letters of this nature are forwarded to Customer Relations Team to address. I will make enquiries with the addressees of your letters as to why they were not sent to us sooner.
I can advise that a full investigation will now take place into the issues you have raised and I hope to be able to write to you with a full response shortly. However, if the investigation takes longer than anticipated I will continue to update you of our progress.
I have enclosed a copy of our Customer Relations booklet, which will explain how your complaint will be dealt with.
I can confirm that I have forwarded your travel expenses claim form to our Nottingham office for them to arrange payment. Once it has been authorised, you should receive payment within 2 weeks, Should you have any queries during this time, you can contact them on 0115 9758353.
In summary;-
Ms B... apologised that the "...letters had not been addressed sooner...
Ms B... promised "...to make enquiries".
Ms B... promised "...a full investigation".
Ms B... promised "...forwarded your travel expenses claim form".
The failure of Atos Healthcare to meet their promises can be seen in later correspondence.
Ms RB... has been replaced by Mr AR....
About your appeal
I am writing about your letter dated 14/08/09 appealing against a decision on your ESA Claim.
We will look at the decision that you have appealed against and, if appropriate, we will revise the decision in your favour. In this case your appeal will lapse and will not be sent to the Tribunals Service. You can appeal against the new/revised decision if you think it is still wrong.
If we cannot revise the decision in your favour we will send your appeal letter and papers, giving our reasons and evidence for the decision, to the Tribunals Service. will send you a copy of these papers.
If someone is dealing with the appeal for you , we will send them a copy of the papers about the appeal.
The Tribunals Service will tell you where and when your appeal will be heard.
If you want more information, please get in touch with us. Our address and phone number are at the top of this letter. An advice centre like the Citizens Advice Bureau or a local law centre can also give you free advice. You can get a list of organisations in your area who can also give you free advice from your nearest DWP office at Luton. If you are a member of a trade union they may be able to give you help with your appeal.
If you ask someone for help and advice you should take this letter with you.
The date in the letter 14/08/09 is wrong. I presumed the DWP meant my letter of the 11 August 2009.
The substantive matter is wrong. I had not yet decided to appeal. In my 11 August letter, I asked "...to defer a decision to appeal pending receipt of a copy of the medical report...". The DWP literature states there is a 30 day time limit to appeal. It is so important to write back as soon as possible within the 30 day time limit as a Tribunal Judge would have no option in Law other than to reject an appeal that was notified outside the specified time.
The 30 days is a short time period. It is shorter than many legal services or solicitors might be able to meet. I can't say whether this is by design or by chance. So a personal "holding" letter written by the patient or carer is important.
Phases such as the following should be included in the letter if they are applicable to the particular situation:-
I am not in a position to decide whether an appeal should be made until
the matter has been considered by my legal and medical advisors.
I have received the medical report and had time to review it
I have received a full copy of the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare and had time to review it. I believe either the review of the information I provided and or the medical examination may be in breach of this Contract.
Letter to Mr AR...
Regarding your letter dated 14 August 2009 which followed my letter to Ms RB... dated 11 August 2009 which followed a letter from Ms RB... dated 29 July 2009, I do not believe there is much disagreement between us. Maybe the following points can help resolve the situation.
My claim is for ESA(C). I have assets and savings over the £15,000 limit. I am 52 and have worked all my life paying tax and NI. I have a primary brain tumour which makes me periodically very tired and unable to do IT development work, which is my profession. I think my claim is valid. I am happy for the DWP to decide what I am entitled to.
I still have not received a copy of the medical report. I am not in a position to decide whether an appeal should be made until I have received the medical report and had time to review it. Unfortunately the letter from Ms RB... dated 29 July instructed that an appeal requires the form in leaflet GL24 to be completed within one month of 29 July. Please can you supply a copy of the medical report, together with leaflet GL24 as I have restricted mobility and have difficulties attending a JobCentre Plus office or a Post Office, and then give me one month from that time to decide whether to appeal.
If you refuse to provide me a copy of the medical report, can you advise me on what legal grounds you are taking this action.
Regarding Atos Healthcare arranging Work Related Activity Group interviews in line with the 29 July letter, please can you ensure that Atos Healthcare records are updated to reflect that Work Related Activity Group interviews are deferred indefinitely on the grounds that I am terminally ill and so sick that any such interview would be of no assistance in the treatment of my brain tumour which is progressive. Naturally if circumstances change, hopefully for the better, I will let the DWP know.
I look forward to receiving a copy of the medical report (an email to ...@... would be fine) and receiving form GL24.
Finally my view is that the DWP has operated correctly in this matter. The DWP is reliant on Atos Origin to provide correct medical opinion. The medical opinion that the DWP should have received is that I should be placed in a Work Related Activity Group and that interviews are of no assistance and may harm me. This status should continue until the tumour is treated by surgery or radiotherapy. Following treatment the situation should be reviewed. If able, I am happy to keep the DWP informed after every consultation with my Neuro Surgeon. The next consultation is scheduled for 10 September.
No reply has been received from the DWP.
A letter arrived informing me that a new appointment had been made for 2:30pm Monday 24 August 2009 at Highgate Medical Centre. It contained the threat that my benefit may be affected. I thought I had claimed ESA which is an allowance not a benefit. Clearly Atos Healthcare are confused.
Please can you inform Ms B... that I have just received a letter from Atos Healthcare dated 16th August 2009 informing me that an appointment has been arranged at Highgate for Monday 24 August 2009. Please could you ask Ms B... to cancel this appointment and ask her to update my record so that no further similar letters are sent out in error.
Ms B... has advised me in a letter dated 10 August that she is conducting a full investigation. I have not yet received a progress report. The matters she is investigating are pertinent to whether or not future interviews are to take place and the location of any such interviews.
Ms B... may wish to confirm with Ms RB... and Mr AR... of the DWP... that all further interviews are deferred indefinitely on the grounds that I am terminally ill and so sick that any such interview would be of no assistance and likely to be detrimental in the treatment of my progressive brain tumour.
Please note I have still not received a copy of the medical report expected to be produced following the 24 July appointment. The thirty days, allowed to decide whether an appeal to the DWP will be made, can only start following receipt of this report. Looking ahead, if the medical facts are disputed it may be necessary to take this matter to the High Court who might need to appoint an independent medical authority to provide clarification. The court may call the Doctor who carried out the appointment on 24 July as a witness.
Please note I have still not received my travel expenses for the 24 July.
Please note that Atos Healthcare send out letters from Atos Origin e.g. form AL1 10/08. It must be very confusing for the people who work for Atos Healthcare, Atos Origin and the DWP. What a shower! What a shambles!
I am afraid that the Customer Relations Team are unable to cancel an appointment on your behalf. You will need to telephone the contact centre on 0800 2888 777 to discuss your appointment. If you are disputing the need to attend an appointment, you may wish to contact the benefit office dealing with your claim as they have sent your file to Atos Healthcare for advice/assessment.
With regard to your travel expenses, I can confirm that Ms B... forwarded your completed form to our Nottingham office for payment and you should receive this shortly.
I would once again ask that you refrain from sending Ms B... e-mails and allow her time in which to investigate your complaint and provide you with a full response.
This seems to suggest Atos Origin are not competent in developing or operating IT services. Their own people can't use their own system. IBM (Big Blue) this is your sales opportunity. Please rescue the UK, the DWP, patients and their carers from the shambles that are the Atos Origin IT services. (An aside to my peers working for IBM. MVS, CICS, PL/1, Assembler, REXX were the best).
The "Tchaikovsky 1812" email after which was silence for a time.
Both the DWP and yourself have been informed. I am confirming to you that you have made a mistake in making a new appointment. It is immaterial whether the DWP has not updated you or more likely whether, judging by the poor service I have seen, you have mislaid the information that the DWP has given you. What you both decide to do with this information is up to you. As a tax payer for over 30 years I am appalled that you would stand by and take no action and waste a doctor's time I presume. I will continue to wait for the DWP to come back to me as the DWP has asked me to and I will wait for Ms B.... Other than this I am pleased not to have to take any more action in this matter.
I would appreciate it if you could arrange for the time being that the only correspondence I received from Atos Origin is from Ms B.... Other correspondence sent out by Atos Origin such as additional appointments made in error will be retained and be put aside pending future High Court action.
I received a cheque for my travel expenses attached to a letter dated 14 August 2009 from a new to me company Atos Origin IT Services UK Ltd on behalf of the Benefits Agency. I have not heard of the Benefits Agency. It can't be too often that Atos Healthcare write cheques.
More evidence of the incompetence of Atos Healthcare. Is Atos Origin really an IT Services company? They give the rest of us in the IT Services industry a bad name.
I received a three page letter from Ms B.... I have scanned the letter in. It is nonsensical and in line with the poor performance so typical of Atos Origin.
Further to Atos Healthcare's most recent Ietter, I am now able to respond to the concerns which you raised regarding your attendance at Highgate Medical Examination Centre (MEC) on the 24 July 2009 for your Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) assessment. l am now also able to respond to your concerns regarding the suggested journey planner.
I would like to apologise for the delay in responding. Unfortunately it took longer than anticipated to obtain all the necessary information to enable me to fully respond to your concerns.
During the investigation into your concerns, I have obtained comments from the Site Manager responsible for Highgate MEC and also input from the Atos Healthcare offices to where your correspondence was addressed.
With regard to our corresondence dated 28 June 2009, addressed to the Appointments Helpdesk in Cardiff and dated 29 July 2009, addressed to Highgate MEC, I can confirm that neither of these letters reached the correct destination of our office in Leeds for which I must offer you our sincere apologies. Both addressees have advised that any correspondence relating to concerns from a customer would be forwarded on to the Customer Relations Team in Leeds, however they have no record of doing so.
I have noted your concern that the journey planner supplied with your appointment letter, advised that your journey from your home to Highgate MEC was over 90 minutes.
Atos Healthcare tries to arrange an appointment at your nearest MEC. Unless agreed with yourself, you are not expected to travel more than 90 minutes (each way) by pubIic transport bemeen your home and the examination centre. The appointment letter also contains information regarding how to contact Atos Healthcare should a customer have any queries about their appointment, including travelling to their appointment. If our Helpdesk contacted by a customer who has been asked to travel more than 90 minutes to a MEC, other options can be explored such as the consideration of travel by taxi or to be visited at home.
I can confirm that according to Transport Direct, a government website providing suggested journey planners, the journey from your home to Highgate MEC shows a duration of 1 hour 48 minutes. Two of our alternative MEC's in the surrounding area would be Romford MEC (a journey of 1 hour 34 minutes) and Luton MEC (a journey of 2 hours 5 minutes).
Moving on now to your concerns regarding your attendance at Highgate MEC , the waiting time that you experienced before being seen and the facilities available at the MEC.
The Site Manager responsible for Highgate MEC has advised that at the time of your scheduled appointment of 3.30pm, a health care professional looked at your paperwork and advised that you needed to be assessed by a doctor rather than a health care professional due to your neurologicaI conditions, an issue which had unfortunately not been highlighted and for which I would like to apologise, as I understand that you then experienced a delay in waiting for a doctor to become available. The Site Manager has advised that the receptionist explained the situation to you and that there would be a delay.
With regard to your concerns about the facilities at Highgate MEC, the Site Manager has advised that as the MEC is not a GP surgey or hospital, it does not have alcohol rubs for people to use in the waiting room , but soap and washing facilities are available in the toilets. She adds that the waiting room does not have any pictures or a teIevision, but does have some leaflets and reading material provided from the Department for Work and Pensions regarding benefits. I can however advise that providing televisions for the waiting areas at the MEC's is something which is currently under consideration.
When asking for proof of identity from customers, the Site Manager has advised that reception staff always ask the customer for identification if they have any. Where the customer does not have a suitable form of identity, this is noted on the Proof of Identity slip and signed by the customer. It is then the responsibility of the examining practitioner to establish the customer's correct identity.
In response to your concern regarding your travel expense claim, as I advised in my acknowledgement letter to you of the 10 August 2009, I forwarded your claim form to our Nottingham office in order for them to authorise and arrange payment for your travel. A Team Leader from our Nottingham office has confirmed that payment was authorised on the 13 August and that you should have received payment approximately 1 week Iater. However, if for any reason you have not yet received payment, you can contact our Nottingham office on 0115 9758353.
I have noted from your letter that you have no complaints regarding the receptionist or the doctor who you saw, and that you thought that they worked well under difficult circumstances. l would like to thank you for this feedback.
It may however be helpful if I explain that the examining practitioner would not have access to a customer's NHS medical patient history. The only information available to the examining practitioner is provided to us by the Department for Work and Pensions and may include information from your GP and an ESA questionnaire if you had completed one.
You have advised in your letter that you are waiting for a copy of the report. I would advise that a request for a copy of your report should be made to your local Department for Work and Pensions' office. I believe that your local office is Luton who can be contacted on 0845 6088627.
I have noted from our records that you did not attend your scheduled appointment on the 24 August 2009 at Highgate MEC. I can confirm that your paperwork was returned to Luton Benefit office the same day, where it remains.
As part of Atos Healthcare's commitment to provide a service of the highest standard, it is important that we continue to be open and receptive to the views of those whose lives are affected by the service that we provide. I am, therefore, grateful for your feedback, which has given me the opponunity to investigate your concerns and make the Site Manager aware of them.
Atos Healthcare strives to provide all customers for whom we are asked to arrange an examination in respect of a benefit claim with a professional and courteous service. I am sorry for the upset that you have experienced on this occasion and hope that any future dealings that you may have with our service will not give you cause for concern.
Let us say I was underwhelmed.
As a layman, it seems to me that here is sufficient evidence of gross medical malpractice. Cardiff earlier confirmed that they just do appointments. the information provided was not looked at prior to an appointment being made. This is in direct contrast to the procedure that the Minister for the Disabled has stated should be the case. It is a clear breach of the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare. Ms B... confirmed that a healthcare professional NOT a doctor looked at the paperwork, did advise that a doctor was required to review the paperwork but that advice was ignored. David Wright, Atos Healthcare, Chief Medical Officer is responsible for medical matters and it seems to me as a layman it is he who is negligent and or neglectful and or incompetent in that he has failed to ensure appropriate medical procedures are in place in line with his medical obligations to the dying, the sick, the disabled and their carers. The Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare refers to the GMC and their standards ad nauseum. Why are the contractual clauses being ignored? Does David Wright have other concerns whose priorities are higher than that of delivering medical excellence. For shame.
I see David Wright, Atos Healthcare, Chief Medical Officer as a corpulant, Hogarthian character complete with periwig proscribing quack medical procedures and snake oil as depicted in those wonderful Hogarth cartoons. Of course, he may be just a quaking jelly fish of a character who hides when Mark Bounds, Atos Healthcare Managing Director appears. A sort of Beaker from the Muppets.
Directors are responsible for the actions of their employees. The remedy once all the complaints and appeals procedures have been exhausted is a civil action. Endless delays benefit Atos Healthcare, real sick people die and dead people cannot petition the high court. For the religious, haunting is perhaps an answer.
Here is evidence of systematic failure in the Cardiff, Highgate and Leeds offices. Here is evidence of the data loss of confidential, medical and personal information. Ms B... notes that Highgate is over 90 minutes away and points out that another scheduled appointment was missed. She fails to point out that the new appointment was made by Atos Healthcare in error. She fails to point out that she was asked to cancel by email. An email to which she responded albeit with spite and malice.
Ms B... does not understand the difference between a Customer as defined by the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare and a Claimant. I prefer patient. I would be happy with Patient Claimant. The use of "Customer" is a gross misrepresentation.
Regarding your letter dated 22 September 2009 which followed your letter dated 10 August 2009. I am taking advice on your response and will write more fully in due course.
Regarding the 24 August 2009 Highgate MEC appointment, I would like to formally complain that you took no action regarding a request by me to cancel the appointment in an email sent to Customer Relations dated 18 August 2009 11:29. Customer Relations replied in an email dated 18 August 2009 12:10. I further replied in an email dated 18 August 18:12. I can provide copies of these emails at your request.
My email of the 18 August 2009 11:29 clearly explained the reasons why the appointment should be cancelled. You failed to cancel the appointment. You failed to address these reasons I gave in your responses to date.
A reasonable person might conclude that it is an abuse of process to continue with a procedure whilst a complaints and appeals process has not concluded. It seems especially pertinent that substantive items in the letters of complaints include the validity of the medical examination process and in particular the location and accessibility of the Highgate MEC and the gross lack of care in consideration of the medical state of the patient.
I delayed raising this complaint in line with your instruction in your email dated 18 August 2009 12:10 "... refrain ... allow her time ...provide you with a full response."
I look forward to receiving acknowledgement of my complaint within two days and your full response thereafter.
Regarding your letter dated 22 September 2009 which followed your letter dated 10 August 2009 and my letters of complaint the latest of which is dated 24 September 2009. In the email I received from Customer Relations, dated 18 August 2009 11:29, I was told I would be provided with a full response. To date, I have not received a full response. Please can you now, immediately, refer my complaints and all correspondence to The Independent Tier for their consideration.
I would like the Independent Tier to consider the following:
Did the Medical Examination that was carried out, conform to statutes "Welfare Reform Act 2007" etc and conform to relevant case Law and so was it valid?
In particular, is it acceptable, other than in a medical emergency, for a doctor to make a diagnosis without access to the patients' medical history or without access to consultation notes from specialist consultants if appropriate? Case law suggests that this is not acceptable in the legal or engineering fields and so as a general principle is not acceptable in the medical field.
Ms B... has stated that "...the examining practitioner would not have access to a customer's NHS medical patient history". The doctor I saw agreed that in my case the medical examination process that she was compelled to undertake was unnecessary and put me at risk. She confirmed that if she had seen my original letter of the 28 June 2009 that it would have been unethical to undertake the medical examination as the long journey, lack of toilets, lack of food, increased likelihood of fitting, especially in the Tube , was potentially harmful to myself as the patient. She further confirmed the process was not a valid medical examination but she was compelled to complete the on line questionnaire which took most of the 1 hour 50 minute duration even though this had the same information as the ESA form completed and given previously to the DWP. It is clear a trained clerk could have completed the process as no medical expertise was required. It is clear a valid medical examination was not carried out.
Was there a breach of duty (tort of negligence) in that the appointment process did not allow the medical state of the patient to be taken into account even when a verbal and an, a priori, written request to take this into account was made?
The result was four days of illness, confined to home, able only to get up for a few hours a day and weeks to recover to the state of strength prior to the appointment. What compensation for damages is appropriate in this case?
Was there under Administrative Law, an abuse of process in that the recommendation given to the DWP assigned the patient, myself, to a Work Related Support Group but appears to have failed to defer further interviews on the grounds of either terminal illness or the fact that further interviews would be of no assistance in the treatment of a progressive brain tumour?
As stated in the ESA form and in my letter dated 28 June 2009, my GP is unable to assist medically. A Neurologist is needed to decide the level of medication to keep the symptoms under control. A Neuro-Surgeon is required to deal with the brain tumour. On what medical grounds was it felt necessary to insist on a further medical appointment at the Highgate MEC on 24 August 2009 and back this up once again by the direct threat of cancellation of allowance? Is this not shameful? How can such gross negligence and dereliction from duty of care occur whilst a complaints and appeals procedure is underway?
Are the long travel distances required by a patient to travel consistent with a Medical Examination as defined by statutes "Welfare Reform Act 2007" etc and Case Law?
It seems reasonable to suggest that the intention of Parliament is for the Medical Examination to be consistent with existing Medical Examinations and in quality to be as good as or better than existing.
NHS Medical Examinations are carried out at the local GP surgery or hospital, by qualified medical practitioners with access to the patient's history, in locations that meet Health and Safety Rules for such places and take into account difficulties in travel and accessibility. Parliament has not clearly expressed a wish that lesser standards should apply.
Ms B... confirmed the journey times to the nearest MECs; Highgate 108 minutes, Romford 94 minutes and Luton 125 minutes. All three times breach the maximum 90 minutes set out in Atos Healthcare literature. Are these times acceptable given that patients are ill and no account is taken of the conditions of the patient? Is it acceptable that these times do not include waiting times or return times?
My GP surgery is a walk of 10 minutes. My local hospital is 20 minutes by car. My local JobCentrePlus is 15 minutes by car. Parliament has not stated that lesser standards in journey times than those of NHS Medical Examinations should apply. Is setting a maximum journey time of 30 minutes more in line with the intent of Parliament?
Atos Healthcare have confirmed that the Highgate MEC is not a GP Surgery or a hospital. Is this, under Administrative Law, an abuse of process given that Parliament has not stated that lesser standards than those of NHS Medical Examinations should apply?
Ms B... states paragraph 10 "...the Site Manager has advised that as the MEC is not a GP surgery or hospital, it does not have alcohol rubs for people to use in the waiting room, but soap and washing facilities are available in the toilets...".
Please note the Health and Safety Executive is taking Health and Safety issues forward and has raised Case No 4177247.
Is there sufficient evidence to suggest there is systematic failure in the services provided by Atos Healthcare in that three offices have failed jointly and severally?
Atos Healthcare jointly fails to comply with the Welfare Reform Act 2007 and with Health and Safety legislation.
Atos Healthcare in their literature and communications appear to confuse the concept of a customer and a patient. The customer is the DWP. I am the patient. Their duty to DWP is defined by contract. Their duty to the patient is defined by their duty of care as defined by legislation and statute. Training appears to be insufficient in this regard.
Of the three letters of complaint, none have been acknowledged within the two days as in the literature.
Cardiff and Highgate failed to respond to letters of complaint.
Cardiff cancelled an appointment with two days notice in breach of the published seven day notice period. This proves the 28 June 2009 letter of complaint was received. Ms B... confirms it was not forwarded to Leeds as it should have been.
Highgate failed to schedule a qualified medical practitioner to be available at the appointment time. No explanation was given for this failure.
Ms B... in Leeds failed to action a request to cancel an appointment scheduled for the 24 August 2009 at Highgate MEC despite being requested to do so on the 18 August 2009 and after acknowledgment of the request.
Ms B... in Leeds failed to respond fully to the letters of complaint and partially responded just under three months after the original letter of complaint in breach of the published time period for dealing with complaints.
Ms B... in Leeds refused to forward the original complaint to The Independent Tier when requested to do so.
Atos Healthcare, at times, has been unprofessional and discourteous and has failed to demonstrate that it is capable of providing services that address the health care needs of patients.
Is the DWP, as the customer of Atos Healthcare receiving value for money when the DWP ie being charged for unnecessary and invalid medical examinations which do not appear to comply with legislation?
Is the patient receiving the duty of care that is consistent with legislation?
I look forward to receiving the adjudication of The Independent Tier on the above and their considerations on the details of my complaints.
The Welfare Reform Act 2007 legislation is clear. I hope The Independent Tier will instruct Atos Healthcare to comply with the legislation. Hopefully Atos Healthcare will comply and it will not be necessary to place a case before the High Court to rule on whether, under Administrative Law, an abuse of process has taken place and as remedy to seek an order of mandamus to compel Atos Healthcare to comply with the legisation.
I hope recommendations arise from this case that will improve patient care and bring the standards of Medical Examinations carried out by Atos Healthcare up to or better than existing NHS standards for Medical Examinations.
Please can you confirm, by return, that you have forwarded this matter to The Independent Tier.
The silence was deafening.
Your appointment details for your Pathways to Work Interview on 12 October 2009 10:45.... A threat that you must attend ... the usual bullying. ... you must contact us.
Regarding your letter dated 2 October 2009. Please can you cancel the "Pathways to Work" Interview with "D..." that you have scheduled, in error, for 12 October 2009 at 10:45 in ....
The position is as stated in my letter dated 15 August 2009 to Mr AR... BDC... which followed my letter dated 11 August 2009 sent to Ms RB... at the same address.
Your records should reflect the substantive point:- "...Regarding ... arranging Work Related Activity Group interviews ..., please can you ensure that ...records are updated to reflect that Work Related Activity Group interviews are deferred indefinitely on the grounds that I am terminally ill and so sick that any such interview would be of no assistance in the treatment of my brain tumour which is progressive. Naturally if circumstances change, hopefully for the better, I will let the DWP know...."
I am concerned your records are in error. I hope this clarifies matters and you can ensure your records are corrected.
Please can you update me with progress in respect of a letter dated 24 September 2009 regarding a complaint and a letter dated 28 September 2009 regarding a request that the matter is referred to the "The Independent Tier". These letters were sent to Ms B..., Customer Relations Manager, Atos Healthcare in response to the letter received from Ms B... dated 22 September 2009. I was expecting a written acknowledgment within two working days as specified in your "Caring about customer service" booklet.
I attach copies of the original letters.
Ms B... is no longer on the case the matter is now with Ms C... Team Leader, Customer Relations.
I write in response to your letters of 24 and 28 September 2009, which were received in this office on 28 and 30 September. Please accept my apologies for the delay in doing so. I also acknowledge receipt of your e-mail of 6 October 2009.
I can advise that I am currently considering the content of your letters and I hope to be in a position to provide you with a response shortly.
If I can be of any further assistance in the meantime however, please do not hesitate to contact me.
I liked Ms B... a simple pleasant bureaucrat, who struggled with English, possibly under paid, overworked and I expect disliked remote control abusing and mistreating of ill people who she is forced to call a "customer" even though this is in breach of Contract. I bet she never tells people who she works for. Perhaps my brain makes me a touch soft. She is probably a hard witch and if so should burn. Bye bye Ms B...
Ms C... Team Leader, Customer Relations is off and running. Important thing to her, it seems, is do anything, say anything to avoid the Independent Tier. Does the Independent Tier exist?
I write further to my letter of 6 October 2009. I can advise that in accordance with our complaints process, which has been contractually agreed with the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), your complaint can only be referred to the Independent Tier when all issues of complaint have been addressed.
Your letter of 26 September 2009 raises new issues that we should have the opportunity to address further in accordance with our complaints procedure.
In view of the above, I can advise that your complaint will be reviewed by a Senior Medical Advisor in the tight of the comments you have made in your letter.
I hope to be able to provide you with a response to your continuing concerns in the near future. If, in the meantime, l can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Job done by Ms C... further delays. She can use a comma which is pleasing.
To Ms C... Team Leader, Customer Relations.
Regarding your letters dated 7 October 2009 and 6 October 2009 which followed my email dated 6 October 2009. Thank you for responding so quickly. It is a pleasant contrast with the tardiness, poor customer service and systematic failure I have experienced to date from Atos Healthcare.
In line with your "Caring about customer service" booklet, I expect to hear from you within 20 working days.
Thank you for confirming that Atos Healthcare has a contractual relationship with the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP). Under case law and in particular cases that set precedents with respect to "Delegatus non potest delegare", Atos Healthcare is under the same legal obligations as the DWP in respect of the DWP contracted for services. Under the rights given to me by the Freedom of Information Act 2000, please can you provide me with a copy of the contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare or provide me with a public website address where I can access a copy. In particular, I am interested in the contractual clauses that relate to the Medical Examination and associated processes. I would like to know who, against the intent of Parliament, has decided that lesser standards should apply to Medical Examinations carried out by Atos Healthcare. There are set time periods for providing this information. There are legal remedies and penalties for not supplying this information.
Notice I did not rise to the bait of yet another unreasonable delay. I changed tack. I want a copy of the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare. I want confirmation that it is Atos Healthcare who abused me. I have evidence that they did this. I want evidence of breach of contract.
It is like a chess game. A letter from these guys putting on more pressure....so predictable. I paraphrase.
We wrote to you ...blah blah blah... help we offer ... Pathways to Work service ...blah blah blah... interview has been arranged.... it is a condition for receiving the full amount of your benefit that you attend ...blah blah blah....
Nice try, I thought. Stagger in to this appointment, near killing myself in the process and then to be told because you can attend, you are "fit for work".
I was wrong. Ms C... (different Ms C...) from JobCentrePlus rang and left a message on the answer phone with full apologies about their error. I paraphrase - of course I did not have to attend any interview...it is easy to make mistakes.
I think I am a pawn up, nevertheless the DWP or Atos Healthcare can always kick over the board. Next time Go or Chinese Chequers.
OK this may have been a touch heavy.
Regarding the telephone message, from "C...", left before lunch today and your letter dated 12 October 2009 which followed my letter dated 5 October 2009.
I am pleased that you have spoken to the DWP in ... and have been advised by them to defer any further interviews until such time as they have addressed the outstanding matters detailed in my letters dated 15 August 2009 and 11 August 2009.
I trust that you have updated your records and that this means that you will not send me any more correspondence which are in error.
I would like to make it clear that should this matter be put before a High Court, I would be asking the judge to consider your motives in sending out your letters of the 2 October and of the 12 October. I would be asking whether these constituted under Administrative Law an abuse of process; deliberate unlawful harassment, neglect, incompetence et al. A judge might consider these actions of yours breach sections of the Human Rights Act 1998. I should not need to remind you that you have a duty of care to the dying, the sick and the disabled.
I appreciate the work of JobCentrePlus people. It is a difficult job. They could handle the medical examinations undertaken by local GPs far more efficiently and at less cost. They must be upset at the money paid to Atos Healthcare scoundrals.
From Ms C... Team Leader, Customer Relations. I detect a slight nervousness. I scanned in the following.
Thank you for your letter of 8 October 2009, which was received in this office on 12 October.
I can advise I can confirm that your request for information under the Freedom of Information Act has been passed to the Department for Work and Pensions, Medical Services Contract Management Team (MSCMT) who are responsible for dealing with such requests. They will be in contact with you in due course.
Once again, says nothing and delays further.
I received a copy of the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcase.
From Ms C... Team Leader, Customer Relations. I scanned in the following.
Further to my letter of 7 October 2009 I can advise that I am stlll in the process of investigating your continuing concerns, which has invoIved requesting a copy of your self assessment questionnaire (ESA50) from the Department for Work and Pensions, which l have yet to receive.
I can confirm that once I receive a copy of your ESA50, my investigations will continue and I will be in a position to provide you with a response once they are completed.
I am sorry for the delay in providing you with a response to your concerns and I thank you for your patience.
Once again says nothing and delays further.
To Ms C... Team Leader, Customer Relations - a real Fabius Cunctator who led Hannibal of Carthage a merry chase, delay must be her middle name.
Regarding your letter dated 11 November 2009 which I received on 14 November 2009.
Please can you provide me with the name of the Health Care Professional who reviewed the information provided and decided a face to face meeting was necessary in my case.
Please can you provide me with the name of the Health Care Professional who undertook my medical examination in Highgate.
I refer you to the Contract between the Department for Work and Pensions and Atos Healthcare.
I refer you to the above Contract, in particular Schedule 4, Section 4.1 Part 2, 1. General, 1.1 Medical Recruitment Standards. Please can you confirm that the use of the above Health Care Professionals by Atos Healthcare complies with paragraph 1.1.1.1 in that, at the time they carried out the above actions, they were "...fully registered, without restrictions or conditions, on the Principal List of the General Medical Council; and in addition...". Please provide me with sufficient information that I can independently check these facts with the GMC.
I refer you to the above Contract, in particular Schedule 4, Section 4.1 Part 2, 5. Medical Quality Assurance. For each of the above Health Care Professional, please can you supply me with a copy of the information Atos Healthcare is contractually obliged to hold in respect of 5.1. "Systems for recording ...".
A reasonable person would regard your further delays in resolving this matter as obstruction. As provided for in the Contract, and taking into account the time scales set out in the Contract, please forward this case immediately to the Independent Tier and provide me with contact details so I can contact the Independent Tier directly. If you, once again, decline to do this, please provide me with the legal grounds for your refusal. A further failure to comply might be regarded by the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions as a breach of contract.
It is once again past the two days the Contract allows for time to reply. Silence descends again.
A new DWP office "the opinion poll people" entered the arena and sent me a letter dated 20 November.
I may be wrong and paranoid but I suspect it is the classic opinion poll "lead the public by the nose" proven management technique. At one time every senior management course that I attended seemed to mention how important it was in turning around a negative perception. I used to enjoy the "old" opinion poll "slight of hand" myself. It was so easy. Done well it cannot be proved.
You choose an "independent" polling company (they all are independent of course). You brief them and let them know how much future work you would like to put their way. Of course you must never tell them what results you actually want even outside the office in a meeting on a park bench in Green Park. They are usually bright enough to work this out for themselves. You assist them in choosing who to sample, a few "negative" always swamped by "not negative". You assist them in what questions to ask. You assist them (as they are not experts in the services of your company) in understanding the replies (disregarding those outside the confidence spread --- a wonderful approach to add weight around "mean"). You know the results you want. It is just a case of making sure the report passes sanity checks so it cannot be dismissed out of hand. This can be difficult and it was worth paying for experts for this.
If only I was well enough to write a book on the Black Arts of Statistics as applied to Marketing, I might make a fortune.
Understanding your experiences of applying for benefits
We are currently looking at ways to improve customers' experiences of sickness-related benefits, and hope you will heIp us in shaping policies on this important issue. We understand that you have recently made an application for a sickness-related benefit. It does not matter if you have not yet gone through the whole process, or have already withdrawn your application. We are still interested in hearing about your views.
We have commissioned Ipsos MORI and the Institute for Employment Studies (IES) to carry out this study on our behalf. Both organisations are completely independent of the Government and political parties.
In the next few weeks, an interviewer from Ipsos MORI will be calling you or visiting you at the above address Unfortunately, they can not arrange specific dates or times for interviews, but don't worry if you are not home when the interviewer calls or arrives. He or she will try again at another time.
All Ipsos MORI interviewers wear identification badges with their photo. Please only allow people who carry this official identification into your home. You may have a family member, friend or carer present during the interview if you wish.
Everything you tell Ipsos MORI will of course be treated in complete confidence - no personal views or information will be passed to anyone outside the research team without your prior approval. More importantly, nothing you say will affect any current or future dealings you may have with the Department for Work and Pensions, Jobcentre Plus, or any other Government departments. Importantly, the information you provide will not affect the benefits you receive, either now or in the future.
I do hope that you feel able to take part in this survey. However, if you need assistance to help you take part, or feel that you do not want to be interviewed, please call J... from Ipsos MORI on the freephone number 0808 ... ... or email her at J... at ipsos.com. By giving us the reference number on this letter during the call or in the email, you will help us deal with your queries as quickly as possible.
We look forward to speaking to you.
My comments above reflect my direct personal experience of what was, and may be still is, common practice in exploiting the power of opinion polls. I have no knowledge of the work of Ipsos MORI (http://www.ipsos-mori.com/) and Institute for Employment Studies (IES) (http://www.employment-studies.co.uk/) and I certainly have no evidence that matters are other than stated in the letter.
I recommend using the search button on the the DWP News Room (http://www.dwp.gov.uk/newsroom/press-releases/). Check the results for search term "IES" and for search term "Ipsos MORI". Both appear to have undertaken a lot of work for the DWP. Judge for yourselves.
My reply to the opinion poll letter.
Regarding your letter dated 20 November 2009 which I received on 25 November 2009.
First, may I respectfully correct you in your use of the term "customer", you should use the term patient or patient claimant. If you refer to the Welfare Reform Act and the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare, a "customer", in respect of Employment and Support Allowance (ESA), is a defined term and has a specific legal meaning. Your use of "customer" in your letter is a misrepresentation. The state has a statutory duty of care to patients and claimants. The term "customer" implies subject to Contract Law. This is not the case in the context you use the word.
Further, my reading of the Welfare Reform Act is that it provides for allowances. The term benefits applies to prior legislation. Feel free to confirm my assertions with the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions. I would be willing to be corrected on this matter if you would draw my attention to the statute or regulation.
Following on from the above, I have a patient claimant experience of sickness related allowances. I do not have and never have had a customer experience of sickness related benefits whatever that might be.
The ignorance you have shown appears to be common throughout the DWP and Atos Healthcare. In my opinion, the misuse of the term "customer" contributes to the abuse of the dying, the sick, the disabled and their carers by the DWP and Atos Healthcare. History tells us the concept of a sick person in Stalin's labour camps or in Nazi concentration camps was not allowed. These regimes preferred to use the term "worker" and similar. It seems to me there is an echo of history when the DWP and Atos Healthcare prefer the term customer or worker or jobseeker instead of the correct term patient or patient claimant.
I have published my abuse at the hands of the DWP and Atos Healthcare on my website "http://www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatos.html". I am willing for anyone including Ipsos MORI to use this information. This web page contains links to my written submission to the House of Commons inquiry and contains links to extracts of relevant correspondence.
I am never at home to pollsters, hawkers or other such callers. I am even more disinclined now that I am terminally ill and of less than robust constitution.
Notwithstanding, if there is additional information that Ipsos MORI requires, I will respond to questions submitted in writing, providing, of course, that the symptoms of my terminal primary brain tumour allows me to. I have periods of weakness and extreme tiredness so how quickly I can respond is not certain.
I would appreciate a reply that you have received this letter and confirmation of my understanding of the term "customer" and "benefits".
No reply has, as yet, been received from the DWP. This does not surprised me.
I did send an email to the Ipsos MORI contact a copy of the letter I sent to the DWP together with a cover note highlighting the treatment I have received and the location of this web page. I included the following comment.
... I hope you are independent, honest etc. Frankly my experience of the DWP and Atos Healthcare suggests that you are another shill.
Feel free to publish this as part of the report. I am not concerned about complete confidence...publish away. I am dying what more harm can you guys do to me. In time injustice will be overcome. Maybe a future Nurmberg Doctors type trial will hang the abusers of the dying, the sick, the disabled and their carers. ...
I received an email reply on the same day as the Ipsos MORI contact returned from leave.
Thank you for contacting me. I am very sorry that you have had such a terrible experience, and I will remove your name from our contact list and ensure that none of our interviewers disturb you at your home.
I would like to clarify that Ipsos MORI is entirely independent of government - we were commissioned by DWP to conduct the survey but otherwise we are not connected with the Department. We do not have personal information about your condition or your medical or benefit records. We also have no connection with Atos Healthcare.
I may be misreading this but this looks like a result for the DWP in that a negative opinion has been excluded from the survey. In addition no promise has been given to publish my comments as part of the report. I expected this.
Like in chess when you know what the next move your opponent will make and you place your reply in a sealed envelop. It does not appear to need the foresight of a chess master to see what the results of the survey will say. I hope I am proved wrong and Ipsos MORI will reveal the full details of the mismanagement, canker and decay that my experience suggests lies at the heart of the services delivered by Atos Healthcare for the DWP. History teaches us there are few individuals who would put their head above the parapet and do what is right regardless of the personal cost.
I sent a further email to the contact at Ipsos MORI. I would like to see the mathematical basis of the method to see that their sampling was fair. I do not know how you would frame a survey to include the posthumous views of the claimants who have died or even of those who are seriously ill. How about those of the third of people with autism who have no job and have been denied allowances. I know how polling was done in Soviet era collective farms. It will interesting to see how it is done in these enlightened times.
Thank you for replying. I have updated my web page with extracts of our correspondence. The sections that refer to the survey are located subsequent to .... http://www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatosletters.html#DWP20091125F If you feel I have made a factual error please let me know. If you would like me to publish a further comment from you or Ipsos MORI, I will consider and try and oblige.
I think you can demonstrate your independence if you confirm that you will both include me in the survey and you agree to publish in an explanatory note to the report the above web page address annotating this note as a particular (maybe atypical) response.
No answer has yet been received. I expect the DWP and Atos Healthcare time distortion algorithm applies e.g. 2 days and 20 days means weeks and months.
Unfortunately my personal symptoms are getting worse which makes reporting the correspondence increasingly difficult. I am sure this will please the DWP and Atos Healthcare.
More delays from Ms C... in a letter dated 25 November 2009. Not exactly unexpected.
I write in response to your letter of 18 November 2009, which was received in this office on 20 November.
Firstly, I can confirm that your request for information under the Freedom of Information Act has been passed to the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), Medical Services Contract Management Team (MSCMT) who are responsible for dealing with such requests. They will be in contact with you in due course.
In response to your request that your case be forwarded immediately to the Independent Tier (IT), I can advise that in accordance with Atos Healthcare's Complaint Procedure, which has been contractually agreed with the DWP, complaints can only be referred to the IT (which is the final stage of the process) when all issues of complaint have been addressed. As your letter of 26 September 2009 raises further issues, they are currently being investigated.
As mentioned in my letter of 11 November 2009, I am sorry for the delay in providing you with a response to your continuing concerns but hope to be in a position to do so very shortly.
And at the end there is the word shortly. In senior management there is a well known approach, which we used to call "the rubber band" approach to people management, to undermine someone. You give bad news before the weekend and good news on the Monday morning. You do this over and over again. Eventually you force the individual to snap, lose it and then you can strike.
A variant is I will give you the information "shortly" then after some time you give a delay. Look above and count as an exercise how many times has a promise been made by Atos Healthcare and then not been met. Atos Healthcare must be using the same management books I used to use. So may be I am a little harsh, perhaps in these more honest and enlightened times this technique is as old fashioned as Dickens. Atos Healthcare are just negligent or incompetent.
This was a surprise as I did not think I had made another Freedom of Information Request. It is a bit much when the Contract clearly states the claimant should be told who undertook the medical examination. It seems to me that Atos Healthcare has something to hide. Atos Healthcare has had months to find out who are the people involved, their qualifications and their contact information.
Thank you for your Freedom of Information request which was received 20 November 2009.
You asked for:- Healthcare Professional's name and Qualifications + information about schedute 4 section 4. 1 part 2, 5. 1
You can therefore expect a reply by 18 December 2009 unless I need to come back to you to clarify your request or the balance of the public interest test needs to be considered.
If you have any queries about this letter please contact me quoting the reference number above.
The DWP Freedom of Information people have been very efficient. It must be a pain to work with the unqualified box tickers that work for Atos Healthcare. This may be a tad unfair on the individuals who work for Atos Healthcare. My criticism is for the brutes in charge of Atos Healthcare and their inhumane approach to the dying, the sick, the disabled and their carers.
Ref: FOI:... Atos Healthcare names et al
Thank you for providing me the edited copy of the Medical Services Contract in my request your reference FOI:.... The information has proved very useful. There is one outstanding point relating to this request, I asked if this information could be made available on line. I believe it is a Government aspiration that as much information as possible is made available on the web. The DWP website would be an ideal location. Can you provide me with your position on publication on the web of the edited copy?
Further to your letter dated 25 November 2009, your reference FOI:... which followed up a request to Atos Healthcare for the names and qualifications of the healthcare professionals involved in my case. I am confused as to why this is a FOI matter. I may have misunderstood the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare. My understanding is that the Contract suggests that Atos Healthcare should supply this case specific information direct to a claimant.
Notwithstanding, I would like to clarify that I am requesting information about the three main individuals involved in my case and others. Mr Jonathan Shaw MP, the Minister for Disabled People has assured me in a letter that the information provided is screened before deciding on a face to face examination.
Person 1. is the person who screened the information I provided. I have been told by Atos Healthcare that this person was not a Doctor. I have been told this person requested that the information should be screened by a Doctor and that this request was refused.
Person 2. is the person advised by Person 1 that a Doctor should review the information I provided. I understand this person ignored the advice and decided a medical examination was required. I do not know whether this person is a Doctor.
Person 3. is, I believe, Dr Ludmila Semetillo, a C... national. I do not know if this person is registered with the GMC. In particular, I would like evidence on her competence in spoken and written English. She undertook my medical examination at Highgate, the quality of which is under dispute.
For the three persons above, I would like the names, qualifications and GMC registration information and for these individuals, and as you mentioned in your letter, in compliance with the Contract, Schedule 4, Section 4.1 Part 2, 5. Medical Quality Assurance, copies of the information Atos Healthcare is contractually obliged to hold in respect of 5.1. "Systems for recording ...".
For Person 1 and Person 2, the date when and the location where they screened the information that I supplied in respect of ESA.
For the three persons, I would like the names, titles and qualifications of the managers directly responsible for the quality of the work of these individuals.
In a letter from Ms C... dated 10 October 2009, I was advised that my complaint will be reviewed by a Senior Medical Advisor. I would like the name, qualifications, GMC registration information and location of this individual. I would like the name, title and contact information of the manager of Ms C... responsible for the quality of work undertaken by Ms C....
For all the individuals referred to above I would like full contact information in the form that is acceptable should this matter be put before the High Court.
Atos Healthcare have refused repeatedly to refer my case to the Independent Tier. Under the Freedom of Information Act, I would like information on the Independent Tier who are defined in the Contract. For the Independent Tier I would like, the terms of reference for this body, the names and qualifications of the members of this body and information on how and where the adjudications of this body are published. I would like summary information comprising the number of cases that have been referred to this body and of these cases how many rulings were made in favour of Atos Healthcare. The figures for the most recent year available is sufficient. I presume this body takes the form of a judicial tribunal, in which case I would just need to be given the web site address for where the activities of this body are published.
I appreciate your efforts. I look forward to hearing from you. Thank you.
In the Nurnberg Doctors' trial is was important to know the names of the abusers and who ordered them to undertake such actions.
At the end of November 2009, at long last, after letter after letter and after over four months, I have been given a copy of my medical report. I assume this was as a result of the personal intervention of the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions. No cover letter was provided. Judge for yourself. You can read it using the link at the top of this page. The DWP have not replied to my letter of the 15 August. Atos Healthcare will not pass my complaint to the Independent Tier. I presume the DWP has paid Atos Healthcare for the services that relate to my case. The tax payer loses again.
The wait continues.
I am aware that there are honest, caring people who work for the DWP and Atos Healthcare. I am aware that these people are concerned at the abuse that occurs. I am aware that these people are pleased that I am publishing this true and honest account. Notwithstanding, it is not helpful to my case to suggest that you would like to send me unauthorised copies of information. I need dated cover letters and the names of the authorised individuals who have agreed to release the information I have requested. I have asked for information such as my Medical Report and am happy to wait for the Minister to provide it to me or provide me with the legal grounds for his refusal. I do not wish anyone to act in breach of their contract of employment and if there is evidence of dishonesty, to report it to the appropriate authority. Your MP is able to provide confidential advice and represent you. I do appreciate the risks you are taking.
My medical condition has got worse.
Ms C... Team Leader, Customer Relations, at long last, has finally made an attempt at addressing some of the issues.
Here in veiled terms and with caveats such as "in good faith" and "appropriate statutory instrument", Atos Healthcare seems to admit, in my case, that they have acted illegally and appear to agree that on a number of occasions they have been in breach of contract. Atos Healhcare offer a consolatory payment of £100.
Further to my letter of 25th November 2009, I am now in a position to provide you with a response to the concerns outlined in your letter of 26th September 2009. Please accept my apologies for the delay in doing so.
Firstly, I can advise that points 2 and 3 of your letter of 26th September 2009 have been considered by the Medical Manager Dr Bruecker. He has advised that your completed ESA50 (self assessment questionnaire) dated 12th June 2009 does not indicate functional disability which would place you into the support group for ESA, demonstrating limited capability for work related activity. This was confirmed by the subsequent assessment. Please note that those pIaced into the support group are not required to attend work- focused interviews.
Dr Bruecker has advised that the pathology of your condition is not clear from the availabIe evidence and in order to establish whether your case falls within the support group he has arranged for a request to be issued to your GP to provide further information. Once received, consideration will be given to whether you should be placed into a support group and therefore not required to attend work focused Interviews.
Our National Customer Relations Manager, Mr Pepper, has provided his comments in response to the other numbered points you have raised:
1. He confirms that an assessment of capacity was undertaken which is different to a diagnostic consultation. There is no requirement to have NHS medical records available for the assessment. When it is considered appropriate by the Healthcare Professional (HCP), further medical evidence can be requested from the customer's medical carers.
4. Travelling time of 90 minutes each way by pubIic transport is a contractual agreement with the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP).
5. I can confirm that I have raised this matter with the Medical Directors' for their information.
6. The arrangements for your appointment and subsequent complaint were not well managed and clearly this caused you considerable upset and inconvenience. Mr Pepper has asked that his assurances be passed on to you that he has accepted your Feedback and this wil l be used in a current review of appointment scheduling being conducted jointly with the DWP. In view of this, Mr Pepper would be prepared to offer you a consolatory payment of £100 in recognition of the deficiencies in the level of service you received.
7. This is a matter for the DWP and you are free to approach them an this point.
8. Atos Healthcare annually undertakes over 30,OOO customer surveys, which show satisfaction levels monthly around 900%. However, there are occasions when the level of service has fallen below acceptable standards and for that Mr Pepper apologises on behalf of Atos Healthcare. However, for the avoidance of doubt, Atos Healthcare has acted in good faith throughout and denies that it has breached any appropriate statutory instrument during the course of this matter.
If you are prepared to accept the offer of the consolatory payment referred to above, I would be grateful if you could please complete the attached form and return to me in the envelope provided. I will then arrange for payment to be made to you.
When further information is received from your GP we will advise you of the outcome.
Once again, I am sorry for the upset caused to you as a result of your dealings with our service. I also hope that this letter has proved helpful in addressing your concerns.
The following is the acceptance of the offer.
Without Prejudice
Dear Mr ...,
Ref: ...
Atos Healthcare's offer of £100.00 is contained in the letter to which this form is an attachment, without prejudice to previous or future correspondence from Atos Healthcare.
Payment will be made by BACS transfer, directly into your bank account. We wilI therefore, require the following information from you.
Name of account holder:
Bank account number:
Bank sort code:
If you wish to accept this consolatory payment, please sign below:
I accept the payment of £100.00
I understand that payment will be made upon receipt of the signed form.
Signed:
Date:
Without considering the insulting amount, it would be very foolish to provide financial information to Atos Healthcare who have proved to be incompetent and negligent.
I reply to Ms C... Team Leader, Customer Relations. I want The Independent Tier to consider the issues raised by my case and to compel Atos Healthcare to meet their legal and contractual obligations. Of course it may be that The Independent Tier does not exist.
Regarding your overdue letter dated 7 January 2010 which I received on 8 January 2010 which followed my letter of the 26 September 2009 and previous. Unfortunately my medical condition has declined further and in the last week I have had to spend time in hospital. My strength is failing. Fits have returned with increased force. I wish you would not procrastinate further.
I conclude from reading your letter that you agree that Atos Healthcare has acted illegally, is guilty of multiple instances of breach of contract of the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare and that you are unable to deny the evidence of systematic failure in the Cardiff, Highgate and Leeds offices.
I insist this matter be immediately referred to The Independent Tier.
The Medical Act 1983 et al makes it an offence for unqualified medical practitioners to undertake medical procedures. The Welfare Reform Act 2007 and previous requires a medical examination. The Minister has confirmed to me that the ESA information should be processed by a qualified medical practitioner. You have agreed in writing that this was not complied with. The Independent Tier should identify the individuals and their managers and request the Police to investigate and prosecute.
An unqualified Atos Healthcare employee and their manager reviewed the information provided and decided a face to face meeting was necessary. This illegal act meant I was required to attend an appointment. Atos Healthcare failed in their duty of care. I would like to stress the seriousness of this matter. If I had died on the way to, at or on the way from this appointment the directors of Atos Healthcare would be facing charges of corporate manslaughter.
I would like The Independent Tier to review my letter (as attached) of 5 November 2009 to the General Medical Council and for The Independent Tier to formally support my complaint over the actions of David Wright, Chief Medical Officer, Atos Healthcare. It would be helpful if The Independent Tier would present to the GMC the evidence of my case to support my complaint.
I would like The Independent Tier to identify the individuals and their managers who were in breach of contract including the repeated failure to acknowledge within 2 days and respond within 20 days, appointment travel times not to exceed 90 minutes, the payment of travel expenses, failure to refer to The Independent Tier and other examples. I would like confirmation that disciplinary action has taken place and to be informed of the nature of the disciplinary action.
I would like The Independent Tier to compel Atos Healthcare to cease misrepresenting the legal term "customer". Atos Healthcare should use "claimant" or "patient" or "patient claimant". The DWP is the customer of Atos Healthcare.
I would like The Independent Tier to review all the cases that were undertaken by the individuals involved in my case and others who followed the same procedures and ensure remedial action is undertaken. The remedial action should include full refunds to the DWP and a statement of account to the National Audit Office. The Independent Tier should write to the auditors of Atos Origin and inform them that the accounts of Atos Origin should be qualified as significant refunds to the DWP are likely.
I would like a personal letter of apology from Mark Bounds, SVP and Managing Director Government and Health Markets and an assurance from him that he will refocus Atos Heathcare to meet their duty of care and to meet in full their contractual obligations. In addition, I would like to receive compensation similar to that I could expect if this matter was put before the High Court. I would like recompense for the actual damage caused by Atos Healthcare and my costs in respect of time and correspondence (see http://www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatos.html).
I expect, by return, your confirmation that this matter has been forwarded to The Independent Tier. I have agreed to keep the Minister informed.
I believe in market forces. Atos Healthcare would be obliged to improve their inferior performance if they would have to repay multiple amounts for each case where service has fallen below acceptable standard e.g. double for the first, then double and double again. The message would soon get through that standards, especially those that protect the dying, the sick, the disabled and their carers, must mean something.
Atos Origin should not be allowed to apply for any Government work throughout the European Union until they provide services that meet standards.
It would be amazing if all the ESA50 forms handled by Atos Healthcare were processed by unqualified healthcare professionals. This suggests all of these would be illegal and invalid. Atos Healthcare would have to redo all the medical assessments and repay the DWP all the monies that have been paid. All claimants who have been denied allowances should be able to appeal on the grounds that their ESA50 form was not processed correctly. The grounds for objection may be reduced if an actual medical assessment actually took place.
The response from Ms Michelle Munro, the Freedom of Information Officer for the DWP handling the Medical Services Contract. She provides only some of the information requested.
It is so disappointing when people, especially those in positions of trust and authority, have so many difficulties in writing correct English. How difficult is it to write the correct "the names of the Healthcare Professionals who were involved" as opposed to the incorrect "the name of the Healthcare Professional's who were involved"? It just does not sound right. Do people proof read these days?
Date: 11 January 2010 OurRef: FOI 1144-2419
Dear Mr B...
Thank you for your letter sent to Ms C... at Atos Healthcare, a copy of which was sent to me on 20 November 2009 to respond to particular points in my role as DWP's Medical Services Freedom of Information Officer.
You asked for the name of the Healthcare Professional's who were involved with your case. We are advised by Atos Healthcare that the Health Care Professional who scrutinised your case prior to assessment was Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrews The Health Care Professional who completed your medical assessment was Dr Ludmila Semetillo.
You asked for information on how to these qualifications with the GMC. For Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrews her Nursing and Midwifery Council Practitioner PIN is 97C0338E Nurse's primary qualifications are held in the public domain and appear on the Nursing and Midwifery Councils website. If you would like to Please refer to www.nmc-uk.org then click on "search the register" from the menu, click on "search the register" and complete the appropriate fields prior to clicking "submit" Atos Healthcare assures DWP that the person registered on NMC website Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrews and Miss Tanya Catherine Waddington is the same person. For Dr Ludmila Semetillo his General Medical Council number is 6165133 Doctor's primary qualifications are held in the public domain and appear on the GMC's website. Please refer to www.gmc-uk.org then click on "check a doctor's registration" and complete the appropriate fields.
You asked for a copy of the information as required in the Contract Schedule 4. 1 Part 2 5. 1 in respect of the above people. I can confirm that Atos Healthcare hold this information rather than DWP.
You concluded your letter asking for escalation to the Independent Tier, I trust this is being taken forward for you by the Convenor:
Gemma Bowes, Convenor to the Independent Tier, Medical Services, Block 1, Wing G, Government Buildings, Lawnswood, Leeds LS16 5PU
If you have any queries about this letter please contact me quoting the reference number above.
Yours sincerely
Michelle Munro, Freedom of Information Officer, Department for Work and Pensions, Medical Services Contract, Management Team, Room 306, North Fylde Central 0ffice, Norcross Blackpool FY5 3TA
Tel: 01253 611552 Email: Michelle.Munro@DWP.gsi.gov.uk
So here is further evidence that Atos Healthcare appears to have acted illegally and have acted contrary to how the Minister believes they should have acted following assurance by Atos Healthcare.
It seems to me that this letter confirms that Atos Healthcare did not allow a qualified medical practitioner to screen the information provided in deciding whether a face to face meeting was necessary. The Cardiff appointments clerk agreed that he had no medical knowledge and was "just doing his job" which was to make an appointment.
The Nurse would have handled my assessment at Highgate but for the fact at reception I insisted on being seen by a Doctor. The information had not previously been looked at since the appointment was delayed due to the need to find a Doctor.
Despite the information provided and a full assessment that lasted 1 hour and 50 minutes, Atos Healthcare are still unable to provide medical advice without now having to contact my GP. Thus Atos Healthcare have acted illegally and are in breach of the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare.
In the meantime Atos Healthcare have charged the DWP for work they have not carried out.
I received a letter dated 18 January 2010 from Mr Geoff Hampshire who claims to be the Convenor to the Independent Tier. I am not sure about this as Ms Michelle Munro, the Freedom of Information Officer for the DWP just a few days ago informed me that Ms Gemma Bowes is the Convenor to the Independent Tier. Perhaps what we have here is an "I am Spartacus" situation. I know how Harry Hill in his TV comedy programme TV Burps would handle the situation.
With every letter, there seems to be more confustication. I am resolved to reread the "Castle Gormenghast" trilogy written by Mervyn Peake to see if this offers some insights.
I nearly died through the actions of Atos Healthcare. Atos Healthcare claims to be a professional company who are supposed to take their duty of care to the dying, the sick, the disabled and their carers seriously.
Dear Mr B...,
I am writing to confirm your complaint has been investigated under the Atos Healthcare complaint process agreed by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP).
The complaint procedure is explained in the Atos Healthcare booklet "Comments, Complaints and Suggestions". This booklet is issued when a complaint is made and is available from Atos Healthcare Helpdesks and Medical Examination Centres.
The final stage of our complaint procedure is a referral to the Independent Tier.
The Atos Healthcare Independent Tier comprises two elements. A private company, commissioned by, although independent of, Atos Healthcare will assess whether Atos Healthcare has adhered to the agreed complaint process. This independent assessment will consider whether all issues of complaint have been identified, investigated appropriately and whether you have received a response that adequately addresses your complaint.
Also, a medical expert in disability analysis, not connected with the DWP work, will also assess whether the medical advice provided Examining Medical Practitioner was appropriate.
The Independent Tier is approved by the DWP. Atos Healthcare is keen to ensure that the Independent Tier provides a fair and balanced assessment of how we handle complaints. We are committed to learn at all times from customer feedback about our complaint process and the conclusions of the Independent Tier. To ensure it fulfils its role appropriately, the Independent Tier may be observed by representatives of recognised welfare groups and also by representatives of the DWP.
I am the Convenor to the Independent Tier. Now that your referral has been made, I will be your point of contact with Atos Healthcare and the Independent Tier
My role is to forward all documentation relating to your complaint to the Independent Tier and then to advise you of the conclusions of the Independent Tier's assessment of the handling of your complaint, together with any changes to our process that may be necessay as a resuIt of their conclusions.
Sometimes the Independent Tier may wish to clarify aspects of your complaint with you. If this is the case I will discuss with you how to best to provide the information to the Independent Tier.
We usually expect to receive the completed reviews within 28 days of referral and I will relay these findings to you upon my receipt. However, Should you have any queries in the meantime, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Yours sincerely,
Geoff Hampshire, Convenor to the Independent Tier
My request in my letter dated 28 Novemember 2009 to Ms Michelle Munro, Freedom of Information Officer, for detailed information about the Independent Tier and in particular where their adjudications are published, has been ignored.
Ms Ann Abraham, UK Parliamentary and the Health Service Ombudsman for England gave evidence to the House of Commons, Select Committee on Public Administration on Thursday 27 November 2003.
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmpubadm/41/3112705.htm
... I suppose if you look at this from the point of view of our evidence, what that evidence says is that the independent tier has been very much a curate's egg and there have been some very good examples of the independent tier working well and there have been some horrendous examples of extremely poor independent tiers and panels....
Tempus omnia revelat.
The reply to Mr Geoff Hampshire, Convenor to The Independent Tier.
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Thank you for your letter dated 18 January 2010 in which you confirmed that you have referred my case to The Independent Tier.
Ms Michelle Munro, Freedom of Information Officer, DWP Medical Services Contract, in a letter dated 11 January 2010 informed me that Ms Gemma Bowes is the Convenor to the Independent Tier. It appears that the DWP, as of a few days ago, does not appear to be aware that you are the Convenor to the Independent Tier. Can you ask Ms Michelle Munro to write to me to confirm that you are the Convenor to the Independent Tier?
In a letter dated 28 November 2009, sent to Ms Michelle Munro, Freedom of Information Officer, DWP Medical Services Contract, I requested information concerning The Independent Tier as follows:
Under the Freedom of Information Act, I would like information on the Independent Tier who are defined in the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare. For the Independent Tier I would like, the terms of reference for this body, the names and qualifications of the members of this body and information on how and where the adjudications of this body are published. I would like summary information comprising the number of cases that have been referred to this body and of these cases how many rulings were made in favour of Atos Healthcare. The figures for the most recent year available is sufficient. I presume this body takes the form of a judicial tribunal, in which case I would just need to be given the web site address for where the activities of this body are published.
So far, she has declined to provide me with this information. I would be obliged if you could provide me with this information or explain on what legal grounds the DWP and or Atos Healthcare are keeping this information secret.
Due to my ill health I am unable to observe the proceedings in person. Notwithstanding I am making enquiries regarding a representation to attend on my behalf. Regardless of whether I am represented or not, I would like to receive the minutes of the proceedings in full.
All information regarding this matter is published on the web page http:/www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatos.html and the web pages that are linked to this page. For example all correspondence, in date order, is published on http://www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatosletters.html. I have desensitised the names of some of the individuals on these pages. Atos Healthcare should be able to provide The Independent Tier of those involved. If they refuse to provide this information, I can provide the names. I trust, providing this information electronically, which is in line with my understanding of Government objectives is in a format acceptable to The Independent Tier.
I look forward to hearing from you.
The reply to Ms Michelle Munro, Freedom of Information Officer.
Thank you for your letter dated 11 January 2010 which replied to my letter dated 28 November 2009 which followed your letter dated 25 November 2009 which in turn replied to my letter dated 18 November sent to Ms C.... You have provided part of the information. I would still like to receive the information in full.
My understanding from your letter is that you have been told by Atos Healthcare the following facts. Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrewsis a Nurse and or Midwife. She is not qualified in Neuro-science, Neuro-surgery or Neurology. She is not qualified in the pathology or treatment of a primary brain tumour. She alone assessed the information provided by the DWP and decided that a face to face meeting was necessary. She alone received my letter of the 28 June 2009 and in spite of the medical evidence provided in that letter still insisted that a face to face meeting was necessary. She requested the Cardiff office to arrange the assessment which occurred at the Highgate Office. She alone decided that the contractual requirement of "travel time under 90 minutes" should not be complied with. Her work was not reviewed or checked by her manager or others responsible for quality, audit and compliance. These are the facts that Atos Healthcare currently believes are true despite the discrepancies and contradictions with written information Atos Healthcare has previously stated as being true. Please let me know if this differs from your understanding of the position.
I refer you to the letter from Ms C... dated 7 January 2010 in which she states the opinion of the Medical Manager Dr Bruecker. Please can you provide me with the General Medical Council number for this individual.
Despite the actions of Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrewsand despite a full medical assessment by Dr Ludmila Semetillo, I can quote from the 7 January 2010 letter; "Dr Bruecker has advised that the pathology of your condition is not clear from the available evidence". This is confirmation by Atos Healthcare that Atos Healthcare has not carried out a valid medical assessment and as such has not complied with the legislation and is in breach of the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare. Please can you confirm that Atos Healthcare has refunded to the DWP all charges related to my case. Further can you inform me of what action the DWP will take over this matter.
The Contract Schedule 4.1 Part 2 5.1 information was originally requested from Atos Healthcare. They forwarded the request to you. The DWP is contractually obliged to ensure that Atos Healthcare staff are trained. The Contract states the DWP holds this information provided by Atos Healthcare. I want to be sure that Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrewsand Dr Ludmila Semetillo have attended and passed the training courses. It is clear from my medical assessment and the poor quality of the medical report that she produced that Dr Ludmila Semetillo has difficulties in spoken and written English. If the training courses have been passed then they are not fit for purpose. Can you clarify on what legal grounds you are withholding this information?
I note that you believe that Gemma Bowes is the Convenor of The Independent Tier. It appears that Atos Healthcare does not agree with you. A Mr Geoff Hampshire has written to me claiming to be the Convenor of The Independent Tier. I find this situation confusing. Perhaps you can clarify matters.
I note from the letter from Mr Geoff Hampshire that representatives of the DWP may attend the hearing by The Independent Tier. Please can you confirm that the DWP will attend, will protect my interests as a patient and will be able to provide me with full minutes.
I note that you have refused to provide me the information I requested regarding the Independent Tier. I have requested this information from Mr Geoff Hampshire. Can you clarify on what legal grounds you are withholding this information?
I note you still refuse to explain why the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare has not been made available online. Are you still refusing to provide an explanation?
I note your change of address from Preston to Blackpool.
For your information, I have published all correspondence on http://www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatos.html. Please let me know if you find errors and corrections.
I appreciate your efforts. I imagine it is not easy dealing with such a company as Atos Healthcare. I look forward to hearing from you. Thank you.
Mr Brian Pepper, National Customer Relations Manager, Atos Healthcare states that the Independent Tier "do not accept direct evidence".
Atos Healthcare - Wing G - Block 1 - Govermnent Buildings
Otley Road - Lawnswood - Leeds - LS15 5PU
Tel: O113 230 9730 - Fax: O113 267 1832
Date: 22/01/2010
Dear Mr B...
Thank you for your letter dated 20 January addressed to Mr Hampshire.
I am National Customer Relations Manager for Atos Healthcare and can confirm Mr Hampshire is the convenor to the Independent Tier and I will inform the DWP contract management team. I can also assure you that your case is currently under consideration by the Independent Tier.
The Freedom of Information officer within the medical services contract team in DWP is responsible, as the public body under current legislation, to deal with FOI requests. As a contractor we will provide information to them and they decide whether this should be released.
Under the terms of our contract we do not divulge the identity of the Independent Tier to maintain impartiality, as they do not accept direct evidence from parties to the complaint. However, they do communicate when necessary through the convenor and you will be provided with 2 comprehensive assessment reports following the conclusion of their review. One will assess the handling of your complaint by Atos Healthcare and one will assess the medical quality of the medical advice provided by Atos Healthcare in respect of your claim to benefit.
Yours sincerely
Brian Pepper, National Customer Relations Manager, Atos Healthcare,
Government Buildings, Lawnswood, Leeds LS165PU
tel O1132 309156 fax 01132 671832
email brian.pepper@atoshealthcare.com
An "independent" organisation that does not accept direct evidence and yet according to the convenor: "To ensure it fulfils its role appropriately, the Independent Tier may be observed by representatives of recognised welfare groups and also by representatives of the DWP".
I have made enquiries of the DWP, welfare groups, the press, national television and international television to see if they would like to attend and report back. Under the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare periods of notice are agreed. We shall see if Atos Healthcare will breach these legally set periods in this instance as they have on many occasions throughout this case.
In my mind the main legal issue is whether Atos Healthcare has acted illegally under Constitutional and Administrative Law specifically whether an abuse of process has taken place. It does not help the Atos Healthcare case that they continue to inappropriately and perhaps illegally use the term "customer" when in most contexts the appropriate and legally correct term "claimant" should be used.
The Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare, Schedule 4 Section 4.1 PART 1 Final Version dated 15 March 2005 page 6 of 15 contains the following:
4.1.7 The CONTRACTOR shall ensure that its complaints procedure includes reference to and details of, a process that will give the Claimant or their representative the right to seek an independent review, by an independent tier, of their complaint should normal procedures not result in a satisfactory resolution.
Schedules contain lists of Acts that the CONTRACTOR has to comply with. These may define the rules and regulations that govern the DWP and Atos Healthcare referral to the Independent Tier. Clearly the Contract contains hundreds of pages of clauses and the details might be defined there, but as yet these have not been found.
The National Audit Office (http://www.nao.org.uk/) does provide guidance. It recommends the use of The Independent Case Examiner (http://www.ind-case-exam.org.uk/).
Department for Work and Pensions: Handling Customer Complaints
http://www.nao.org.uk/publications/0708/handling_customer_complaints.aspx
Since we last reported, the Department has made significant improvements to its complaints handling. It has extended the remit of the Independent Case Examiner as an additional, independent tier through which customers can seek redress for complaints. In parallel it has clarified its three-tiered complaints resolution process and has made efforts to direct customers more clearly through this process. The Department is also taking steps to embed the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman good practice principles across all the Agencies.
Publication date: 23 July 2008
As this recommendation is more recent that the legislation listed in the Contract, it is reasonable to assume that this should apply.
Email to Mr Brian Pepper, National Customer Relations Manager, Atos Healthcare asking for clarification in respect of the Independent Tier.
24 January 2010
Dear Mr Pepper,
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Thank you for your letter dated 22 January 2010, your reference ... regarding the Independent Tier.
The Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare, Schedule 4 Section 4.1 PART 1 Final Version dated 15 March 2005 page 6 of 15 contains the following:
4.1.7 The CONTRACTOR shall ensure that its complaints procedure includes reference to and details of, a process that will give the Claimant or their representative the right to seek an independent review, by an independent tier, of their complaint should normal procedures not result in a satisfactory resolution.
So far I have not found any further reference which provides more details in respect of a "Claimant".
I would like to draw your attention to a document published 23 July 2008 by the NAO for the use of the DWP (which covers the activities of Atos Healthcare) with a web site address as follows. http://www.nao.org.uk/publications/0708/handling_customer_complaints.aspx
I believe this defines the procedure that ought to be used if you are unable to provide me with a more recent procedure agreed by the NAO.
My understanding is that under Constitutional and Administrative Law it may be a further abuse of process if you fail to comply with the NAO. Even though it is time consuming to go through the Contract line by line to identify breaches of the Contract, I have sufficient examples to be happy to put my evidence before the Independent Tier within the time period as set out in the Contract. I still await information requested through FOI.
Finally can you clarify that even though your title contains the term "customer", in a strict legal sense, as set out in the Contract, this is a misrepresentation of the relationship between myself as "CLAIMANT" and Atos Healthcare as "CONTRACTOR" and the DWP as the "AUTHORITY". Is there a Claimant Relations Manager?
I look forward to hearing from you.
Yours sincerely
I think Atos Healthcare will appreciate that I brought to their attention the latest opinion on how the Independent Tier should be constituted. I sent a second email copy to Customer Relations, Atos Healthcare to ensure this email is received. My experience is that Atos Healthcare can have problems with communications.
The gross breach of the Contract that upsets me most is the breach of Schedule 4 Section 4.12 PART 1 Final Version dated 15 March 2005 page 7 of 11 which lists those medical categories that need "Reference to MA required for advice", the list includes cancer. How could the Nurse or Midwife be so negligent? This breach of Contract makes other serious breaches include assault and injury to be less in comparison. Then we get the breaches of Contract relating to 2 days and 20 days. Then we get the breach of Contract that relates to traveling time and expenses. Then there is the information that Atos Healthcare provided to the DWP which may be a libel. It is outrageous. I look forward to when the Minister hands this matter to the Attorney General.
Atos Healthcare email system broken.
This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification.
Delivery to the following recipients failed.
brain.pepper@mail2.uk.atosorigin.com
Further evidence of the incompetence of Atos Origin IT Services which claims to be a competent IT Services company. I emailed to Customer Relations, Atos Healthcare again.
The email from Mr Brian Pepper, National Customer Relations Manager comfirming compliance with the DWP procedure.
Dear Mr B...
Thank you for your email. I understand the term customer is used by the Department for Work and Pensions in their dealings with the general public who interact with their services and Atos Origin also uses that terminology. Claimant is an alternative and used within the medical services contract.
Our aim is always to adhere to the complaint process agreed with the DWP. As stated in my letter we are awaiting the outcome of the referral to the Independent Tier.
Regards
Brian Pepper
Claimant is NOT an alternative to "customer" both "customer" and "claimant" are defined in the contract. No part of the contract allows Atos Origin to deliberately misrepresent a "claimant" as a "customer".
Does Atos try a "spoof job" entrapment approach?
I received by email a job specification for the perfect job that is a perfect fit for my CV. It is perfect for my interests. It is perfect for my preferred location. I have the qualifications, the knowledge and experience. My psycho-metric profile is a good match. The pay is over £3,500 after tax and NI per month plus benefits which is in line with my pay before I became ill.
I cannot say how galling it is to have to turn down such a golden opportunity because of my medical condition. Would anyone give up this sort of brilliant job, if they were not sick, so that they can receive under £90 per week together with the hassle from the DWP and Atos Healthcare?
It is odd through. I have updated all the jobs sites to list my status as not available. Agencies contact me from time to time just to find out how I am. They cheer me up by telling me the opportunities on their books that I would be perfect for. We joke that maybe I should get a few mates together and they could have a go at cutting out the tumour. The "wait and see" approach of the brain surgeon is not the rough tough get things sorted now approach that I have always followed.
I have no evidence that the DWP or Atos Healthcare would be capable of acting so dishonestly. My experience of Atos Healthcare suggests to me that they may feel it is acceptable to deceive if this can be used to prove the deception of another. I think the approach is dishonest and unethical especially when such tiny amounts are at stake.
Sadly I binned the email.
On the other hand Atos Healthcare have said to the DWP that I am fit enough to attend meetings of the "Work Related Support Group". What can this "Group" do? Magic? Give me my strength back? Make me able to write again? Make my right side stop twitching? Instruct the DVLA to give me my driving licence back?
Atos Healthcare require the ESA50 form to be completed again. The covering letter below together with the ESA50 form and a pre-paid envelope was supplied. I suspect more sneaky tricks. Atos Healthcare have not completed processing the last one from June 2009. Are Atos Healthcare incompetent, negligent, vexatious or malicious?
MEDICAL SERVICES Provided on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions 0ffice address: NOTTINGHAM Atos Healtheare Summit House, Nottingham Business Park Orchard Place Nottingham NG8 6PX Reference: ... Date: 28th January 2010WE NEED SOME INFORMATION
Dear Mr B...
We have sent you form ESA50 ESA QUESTIONNAIRE with this letter. This is to help us provide medical information that will assist the Department for Work and Pensions (the DWP) when looking at your entitlement to benefit.
Please fill in this form so that we can see how your illness or disability affects your ability to work. Read the questions carefully. It will help us if you answer the questions as fully as possible.
This form also gives you the chance to tell us about your other health problems, including any mental health problems. We may also have to ask you to attend a medical assessment with an Approved Healthcare Professional at a later date.
Please only return the enclosed form ESA50 ESA QUESTIONNAIRE to the address at the top of this letter as soon as you can, but no later than 16 March 2010. Use the envelope we have sent you. It does not need a stamp. Please allow a few days for the form to reach us.
Medical certificates or any other documents must be sent directly to the office that deals with your claim. Do not enclose them with form ESA50.
If you want help filling in this form
You can ask someone to write down your answers for you. Ask a friend or relative to help you. Or get in touch with the office that deals with your claim. They will have a copy of the form and can go through the questions you are having trouble with over the phone. Sometimes they may be able to fill in a form for you. If they do this, they will send the form to you. You can the check, sign and send it back. They can send you a completed claim form in Braille or large print.
More information
If you want to know more about why we have sent you this form, or if you will be unable to complete the form by the required date, please contact the Jobcentre Plus office that deals with your claim. You can get the phone number by ringing 0800 0556688 and following the instructions.
Yours sincerely,
Atos 0rigin
Provided by Atos Origin on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions
Registered Number: 1245534
Registered Address: Atos Origin IT Service UK Limited, 4 Triton Square, Regent's Place, London NW1 3HG
I have until 15 March 2010 to email Atos Healthcare. I am hoping by then they will have completed processing the last one. If not, I will drop them an email asking why they have sent me this form.
At some point I will have to complete an ESA50 form again. I do not think it is unreasonable to expect the form to be completed annually. Unfortunately my personal medical condition has worsened and I have lost the ability to write legibly and for the length of time needed to complete the 30 page form. I intend to write to the DWP, inform them of the changes in my medical circumstances and ask them to complete the form using both the information previously supplied in the last ESA50 form and the amendments.
I actually think the DWP are doing as good a job as possible given the incompetence of Atos Healthcare. It must be difficult dealing with such heart rending cases day after day. Atos Origin use a computer programme to generate their advice. It is the Decision Maker who has to follow this advice however obviously wrong. The Decision Maker is not medically qualified. I suspect my Decision Maker took a risk and paid me the allowance. This is why she has not ever given me the "points" score. Good for her. If she can do this for more deserving cases and keep below the radar I wish her well.
The email to Mr Brian Pepper, National Customer Relations Manager requesting a copy of the original ESA50 form.
Please can you provide me a copy in a printed format such as could be presented in the High Court of the original ESA50 form that I completed and supplied to the DWP in Summer 2009. The DWP passed this form to Atos Healthcare. As this matter is being referred to the Independent Tier you must have a copy to hand otherwise the Independent Tier would not be able to do the work that they are required to do under the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare. As the Minister is taking a personal interest in my case I am showing due diligence in that I hope to assure the Minister that the Independent Tier is reviewing the correct document.
For information I am pleased to say I have published more extracts of the actual contract on my website: http://www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatos.html. You should be familiar with the targets for the provision of information etc as set out in the Contract. I am sure you do not want to run the risk of a breach of Contract in this matter or for the Minister to intervene.
Please can you forward for action a copy of this email to Mr Brian Pepper, National Customer Relations Manager (who is reponsible for Claimants such as myself) and a copy of this email for information to Mr Geoff Hampshire, Convenor to the Independent Tier.
Thank you for your assistance. I expect acknowledgement within the specified time and the information shortly thereafter certainly before the Independent Tier is convened.
In January, I had to visit the hospital twice. My anti-fitting medicine was first doubled and then tripled. I lost the ability to write with my right hand. I lost the ability to walk for long periods. I am tired most of the time. The NHS services have been excellent.
The email to Mr Brian Pepper, National Customer Relations Manager requesting a copy of the original ESA50 form.
Please can you forward for action a copy of this email to Mr Brian Pepper, National Customer Relations Manager (who is reponsible for Claimants such as myself) and a copy of this email for information to Mr Geoff Hampshire, Convenor to the Independent Tier.
Thank you.
Dear Mr Brian Pepper
Under Schedule 4 Section 4.1 Part 1 - Common Business Requirements 4.3 Serious Complaints there is a clause 4.3.3 "The CONTRACTOR shall inform the AUTHORITY upon receipt of all complaints which fall into this category". I have suffered "assault as a consequence of examination". I have suffered actual "injury as a consequence of the examination". Dr Bruecker from Atos has agreed that a valid assessment was not carried out.
1. Please can you confirm that in compliance with the Contract between the DWP and Atos Origin you have informed the DWP of this serious complaint.
2. Please can you provide me with the contact details of the individual within the DWP dealing with this serious complaint.
3. Please can you confirm that you have requested the DWP to immediately remove Approval from Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrewsand Dr Ludmila Semetillo, both on the grounds of assault and in addition in the case of Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrews on the ground of injury. There is also the matter of libel. Further delays may put other patients at risk. I should not need to stress the dangers associated with unqualified individuals making decisions that in legal terms can be considered as assault and have resulted in actual injury. I have suffered assault, injury and libel. It is in your power to prevent more hurt.
4. I note that you have not as yet confirmed that in respect of the Independent Tier that you will apply the NAO legal procedure that the DWP has agreed that the DWP and companies such as yourself must comply with. I would like to point out clause 4.6.1 "The CONTRACTOR shall implement a revised independent tier for complaints as agreed with the AUTHORITY.". Can you explain on what legal grounds you are so far refusing to comply with this clause? You emailed me on 25 January 2010 but did not confirm your compliance with this clause in the Contract. Can you perhaps give me an idea when you will be in a position to write to me with an answer?
I know the Minister is taking a personal interest in this case. Please can you provide this information in writing.
Thank you
I telephoned the DWP local BDC who handled my case last year and has not written to me since August 2009. I asked whether the DWP had been informed that the medical assessment provided by Atos Healthcare was not valid. They could not tell me.
I asked them if Mr Brian Pepper, National Customer Relations Manager, Atos Healthcare had contacted them to inform them that I have made a serious complaint in respect of assault and injury and that the two healthcare professionals should be removed from the "Approved" list. They could not tell me.
I asked the DWP who managed the Atos Healthcare contract. They could not tell me but eventually suggested Head Office in London. This was after giving the contact details for Atos Healthcare. I pointed out the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare states that the DWP has to oversee how the Contract operates.
Eventually I asked them to send me a copy of my original ESA50 form. This they agreed to do. They checked it was in the archives. But they could not say how long it will take to do this.
I must say the chap at the DWP was very helpful and obliging. It is a pity that there are such large gaps in his knowledge and it seems he did not have the IT systems to provide him with the information he needs to do the job.
I emailed Mr Brian Pepper, National Customer Relations Manager Atos Healthcare (brian.pepper@atoshealthcare.com) to ask why he has not taken any action over the serious complaint as he is obliged to do under the Contract. I copied the email to Customer Relations, Atos Healthcare (customer.relations@atoshealthcare.com) and to the DWP Head Office (ET-DB-SECRETARIAT@DWP.GSI.GOV.UK).
I just telephoned the DWP Luton BDC. They were not been made aware by Atos Healthcare that my medical assessment was invalid and that I had made a serious complaint regarding assault and injury.
They were not aware if the DWP had removed "Approval" from the two healthcare professionals involved.
They were not aware who manages the Contract on behalf of the DWP and who in the DWP protects the interests of patients such as myself. They suggested I contact the DWP Headoffice in London. The Minister has written to me on two occasions informing me he is investigating this matter. I am sure he will take a dim view of your tardiness which places patients at risk of assault and injury.
I look forward to receiving an email by return that you have taken action on this matter and thereafter without further undue delay confirmation in writing of the actions you have taken.
Thank you
...
Copied the Email sent on 1 February 2010 as above.
Extract of letter from the DWP informing of changes to the amount of benefits to be paid from 15 April 2010.
Your reference is ... Please tell us this number if you get in touch with us Luton BDC Jobcentre Plus Ascot Road Watford WD99 1AB Date 9 February 2010 Phone 0845 6088627 TEXTPHONE for the deaf/hard of hearing ONLY 0845 6O88619Dear Mr B...
YOUR CLAIM FOR EMPLOYMENT AND SUPPORT ALLOWANCE
CHANGES IN SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS
From 12 April 2010 the rates of Social Security benefits will change.
The attached sheet shows how we worked out your money. If you want more information please get in touch with us. Our phone number and address are at the top of this letter.
We will pay this new amount from your first payday after this date.
OTHER HELP YOU MAY BE ENTITLE TO
You may be entitled to other help. To find out more about this ask us for leaflet INF2 "Other help you may be entitled to"
HOUSING BENEFIT AND COUNCIL TAX BENEFIT
You could get Housing Benefit or Council Tax Benefit. Get in touch with your local council as soon as possible. If you are already getting Housing Benefit or Council Tax Benefit you should show them this letter.
IF YOU WANT TO KNOW MORE ABOUT THIS DECISION OR IF YOU THINK IT IS WRONG
Please contact us and we will give an explanation. Our address and phone number are at the top of this letter. You should contact us within one month of the date of this letter, or we may not be able to consider any dispute.
WHAT HAPPENS AFTER THE DECISION IS LOOKED AT AGAIN
If the decision can be changed we will send you a new decision. If we cannot change the decision we will tell you why. You will still have the right of appeal against the decision.
HOW TO APPEAL
To appeal, fill in the form in leaflet GL24 "If you think our decision is wrong". Please send it to us within one month of the date of this letter. You can get this leaflet from your Jobcentre Plus Office. Your appeal will be heard by an independent appeal tribunal.
If the decision is wrong, the independent appeal tribunal can change it. But the independent appeal tribunal cannot:
- change the law that the decision is based on;
- pay more money than the law allows;
- check or change your contribution record.
If you disagree with our record of your contributions, please tell us at once. We will check your records and tell you the result. If you still disagree you can ask for a formal decision.
Jobcentre Plus staff work to offer a complete service through your Jobcentre. If you have an enquiry about your claim for Employment and Support Allowance you will be referred to the Decision Maker or appeals section.
PLEASE KEEP THIS LETTER FOR YOUR INFORMATION It will help us if you have this letter when you make any enquiries or need an explanation about the decision.
How Employment and Support Allowance has been worked out The Employment and Support Allowance Award The payment of Employment and Support Allowance is based on your National Insurance Contribution records and any additional amount the law says you need to live on. We call this Contributory based and Income Related Employment and Support Allowance. Your living expenses £65.45 Limited capability for work addition Extra Money because you are in £25.95 the Work Related Activity Group For the first week in December a Christmas Bonus payment of £0.00 will be made. Which gives a total £91.40 Employment and Support Allowance amount Income and Benefits No income will be taken off your Employment and Support Allowance Your Employment and Support Allowance amount of £91.40 less total income of £0.00O So your entitlement is £91.40 The amounts on this page apply from 15 April 2Ol0. Yours sincerely Ms RB... ManagerYour benefit(s) and state Pension changes
From 6 April 2010, the age at which women may receive their State Pension will gradually increase to age 65, bringing it info line with the State Pension age for men. This change will be phased in gradually over ten years, between 2010 and 2020. This means the age at which men and women can apply for Pension Credit is also increasing.
As a result of these changes, the age at which you can continue to receive certain benefits that have previously stopped at age 60 will also increase.
Income Support - the age up to which this would normally stop will increase in line with the gradual increase in State Pension age for women. This change applies to both men and women.
The age up to which the benefits below can be paid will also increase in line with the gradual increase in women's State Pension age but the increase only applies to women, as men can already receive these benefits up to the age of 65:
- Incapacity Benefit;
- Jobseeker's Allowance;
- Employment and Support Allowance;
- Reduced Earnings Allowance; and
- Bereavement Benefits.
Severe Disablement Allowance (SDA). Please note that if you receive SDA this may continue in payment beyond State Pension age unless your State Pension is more.
In addition, from 6 April 2010 the minimum age for receiving the Winter fuel Payment will also rise in line with the increase in State Pension age changes.
You will still need to meet the necessary entitlement conditions to receive any of these benefits. These benefits are usually only available in the United Kingdom. If you are going abroad you should check entitlement with Jobcentre Plus by visiting www.jobcentreplus.gov.uk (www.nidirect.gov.uk for Northern Ireland customers) or you can find their address and phone numbers in your local phone book. If you are already living overseas please contact the International Pension Centre by visiting www.direct.gov.uk/statepension.
Jobcentre Plus (Jobs & Benefits Offices/Job Centres for Northern Ireland (NI) customers) will continue to offer a number of different programmes and services to help you in moving closer to and returning to the workplace.
The State Pension age for everyone will further increase from 65 to 68 years between 2024 and 2046. This will affect anyone born on or after 6 April 1959.
For more information about the changes to State Pensions, visit the Directgov website at www.direct.gov.uk/statepension (www.nidirect.gov.uk for NI customers.)
Extract of letters from the Convenor to the Independent Tier who reports that investigations have been completed. The cover letter has attachments comprising a part which considers the administrative handling and a part which considers medical issues and concentrates in the main on the medical report.
It should be noted that the medical report uses the correct term "claimant" and the other parts use the terms "customer" and "client".
Atos Healthcare reputation for poor quality is confirmed in that a reference is made to a letter dated 2019, a reference is made to the Department "of" Work and Pensions , a reference was made to a letter sent to the "Client" whoever that might be, a reference was made to the Incapacity Benefit and other errors.
Though reference is made to Statutory and Regulatory Instruments the important matter of multiple breaches of the Contract between the DWP and Atos Origin IT Services is not referenced. The fact that Atos Healthcare has agreed that the ESA report is unsound medically is not referenced.
The BMA comment is partial. Here Atos Healthcare have agreed that they are in breach of the Contract and despite their assurances to the Minister the ESA information was not processed by a qualified medical practioner in deciding whether a face to face interview was necessary. The incompetence of Atos Healthcare is emphasised in that they are not able to identify the individual involved. It is difficult to believe that Atos Healthcare have such a poor approach to audit and record keeping. I suggest the BMA has concerns at Atos Healthcare using unqualified employees to take medical decisions in respect of whether a face to face assessment is required.
A patient is not in a position to decide about terminal illness.
At the time of the assessment I had no access to the Contract which states that the medical practitioner must be a specialist in the pathology and treatment of the medical condition or refer to the patient's GP and or Consultant. My GP has stated time and again he is not able to treat me as I need a specialist Neuro-surgeon and Neurology. Dr Ludmila Semetillo should have followed GMC advice and not carried out the assessment. The fact that she did, constitutes an assault as defined in the Contract. Dr Ludmila Semetillo asked questions and carried out a few simple tests. The fact that a doctor is able to carry out an examination is irrelevant. The Contract defines when an examination conforms to rules and when it does not. Dr Bruecker knew that he would be in breach of the Contract if he carried out an examination without information from the GP and Consultant. His evidence will be put forward to the GMC. I have been told that other Atos Healthcare doctors who have stated to the patient that they are not qualified to carry out the examination and have ceased immediately the assessment. It appears to me that Dr Ludmila Semetillo was unprofessional and is guilty of misconduct. A similar case can be made against the Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrews the nurse. She should not have forwarded the matter to the doctor.
Atos Healthcare has not provided information through a freedom of information request that Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrews or Dr Ludmila Semetillo has passed the Atos training. This is damning of Atos Healthcare.
It shows the Atos Healthcare slip shod approach to quality when they cannot get such an important investigation correct. It beggars belief that Atos Origin IT Services can be used for Government projects.
Dear Mr B..., I am writing in my capacity as Convenor to the Independent Tier (IT), to inform you that the IT has now completed their investigations. I have copied the findings from the IT, which comprises an assessment about how the complaint has been handled by Atos Healthcare and also an assessment of the medical advice provided to the Department for Work and Pensions- In respect of the administrative handling the IT have commented on: - The specific issues of your complaint - The investigation conducted - The response provided - The outcome provided - The tone of the correspondence From Medical Services - The complaints process As you will see Atos Healthcare has been supported by the Independent Tier in our handling of the complaint. An independent medical practitioner, trained in disability assessment medicine has also provided an assessment relating to the quality of the relevant medical report relating to your complaint. The independent medical practitioner has confirmed that the medical report is completed in accordance with Atos Healthcare's professional and quality standards. I can confirm that both assessments oF the Independent Tier have been forwarded to the office dealing with your claim in Jobcentre Plus. This now concludes the Atos Healthcare complaints process; if you have any further queries you may contact the Chief Executive of Jobcentre Plus at the address below: Jobcentre Plus Jobcentre Plus Chief Executive, Room 608, Caxton House, Tothill, London SW1H 9NA Atos Healthcare aim to provide a professional, fair and courteous service to all customers who undergo medical examination in connection with a claim for benefit. On behalf of Atos Healthcare please accept my sincere apologies for the inconvenience and upset caused to you on this occasion and I hope that any further dealings with our service will not give you cause for complaint. Yours Sincerely Geoff Hampshire Convenor to the Independent Tier
Page 1 of 4 FILE NUMBER 432 INDEPENDENT TIER FEEDBACK REPORT Ref: Atos Healthcare Complaints Procedure MED-CPO1 version 4 This report covers the way the Complaint was handled (As explained in the Convenor's letter of 18 January 2019 to the Customer, the remit of this element of the Independent Tier is to assess whether Atos Healthcare has adhered to the agreed complaint process). It is custom and practice for the term "Customer" to be used to describe the individual who has lodged the complaint. SPECIFIC issues identified: This complaint related to the circumstances surrounding a medical examination conducted on 24 July 2009 (the Customers letter was dated 29 July). This letter raised 9 issues and the Customer also asked when he could expect to receive a copy of the report. (Prior to this the Customer had written a letter (dated 28 June 2009) asking a number of questions related to a medical assessment arranged for the 9 July 2009 that was subsequently cancelled). The letters mentioned above were received by Customer Relations (CR) in Leeds on 10 August 2009. It was clear from the communications the Customer Relations Manager (CRM) sent to the Highgate Site Manager (HSM) and to the Offices where the Customer had originally sent his letters, that she recognised the issues relating to his assessment and the late receipt of his letters by CR. She also addressed the issue regarding his expenses which was covered in her acknowledgement letter of 10 August. It was not evident that the issues relating to items 2 and 5 in his letter of 29 July had been recognised as no action regarding these points was undertaken. He also requested information as to how he could obtain a copy of his medical report. This issue was clearly recognised as he was advised of the action he needed to take in the CRM's response letter of 22 September (it is noted that the opportunity to provide this information was not taken when the CRM sent her acknowledgement letter on 10 August). Further communications were received from the Customer regarding what he considered to be breaches of the Complaints Procedure and he asked for immediate referral to the Independent Tier. It was confirmed to him why this could not be done at this time. On 18 August the Customer requested that the CRM cancel an appointment that Atos Healthcare (AH) had made for him for 24 August. He was suitably advised on this issue on the same day. The Customer remained dissatisfied - his letter of 26 September refers, where he again requested referral to the Independent Tier before due process had been completed - and he raised 8 specific issues. It is clearly evident that AH recognised all these issues as the National Customer Relations Manager (NCRM) provided a response to the Customer Relations Team Leader (CRTL) on 5 of them, pointed out that items 2 and 3 needed to be considered Page 2 of 4 by a Medical Manager (MM) while point 5 should be raised with the Medical Directors Office for further consideration of the suggestion. In the meantime the issues addressed in the Customer's letter of 18 November were recognised, as evidenced by the content of the CRTL's letter of 25 November. The Independent Tier noted that 2 items in the Customer's letter of 29 July 2009 had not been considered but otherwise AH staff had recognised the specific issues. INDIVIDUAL investigation conducted: At the first stage of the investigation the CRM sought information from the HSM regarding the circumstances surrounding the Customer's assessment and contacted the offices to which he had originally sent his letters. This is in line with the Guidance given in the AH Complaints Procedure (although points 2 and 5 were not followed up). At the escalation stage the CRTL primarily elicited the assistance of the NCRM followed by an MM and this again looked reasonable. In the main, the Independent Tier considers that an appropriate investigation had been undertaken. COMPLETE response provided: Having sought feedback from the HSM and the offices to which the Customer's original letters had been sent, the CRM sent a response letter dated 22 September to the Customer covering most of the issues raised (with the exception of 2 and 5). This letter also advised him how he could obtain a copy of his medical report. At the escalation stage the CRTL's response letter of 7 January 2010 addressed all of the points raised by the Customer in his dissatisfaction communication of 28 September 2009. The Independent Tier considers that, on balance, complete responses were provided. OUTCOME provided: On receipt of this complaint a letter of acknowledgement was sent to the Customer advising him that a full investigation would take place and he was also sent a copy of the Customer Relations booklet that explains how complaints are dealt with. There followed a number of communications from the Customer and these were duly responded to. The Customer received an update letter from the CRM dated 4 September that explained that she was currently awaiting comments from the Contact Centre Team Leader. When the CRM had received further information she sent a full response letter dated 22 September to the Customer. This letter identified all those who had been involved in the investigation thus far. The Customer's letter of 26 September 2009 was received by AH on the 30th and this was acknowledged by letter dated 6 October. This explained that his complaint would be reviewed by a Senior Medical Advisor. In his letter of the 26th September the Page 3 of 4 Customer had requested referral to the Independent TieT so the reason why this could not be done at this stage was explained in the CRTL's letter of 7 October. An update letter was sent to the Customer on 11 November in which the CRTL explained that she was still investigating his concerns and was awaiting a copy of his ESA50 from the Department of Works and Pensions. The Customer wrote again on 18 November 2009 and his queries/requests were adequately addressed in the CRTL's reply dated 25 November. It was evident thereafter that the investigation continued apace however it was not until the 7th of January 2010 that a full response letter was sent to the Client. This communication identified the people who had been involved. In response the Customer emphasised his desire that his complaint be forwarded to the Independent Tier. That the complaint had been so referred was confirmed by the Convenor to the Independent Tier who satisfactorily explained its remit in his letter of 18 January 2010. The Independent Tier considers that the Customer was kept suitably advised of the outcome, but would comment that there was an unsatisfactory delay before the final response letter was sent to the Customer. TONE is appropriate: Having read all the communications sent to the Customer by various members of AH's staff, the Independent Tier considers that they were of a satisfactory standard and were easy to follow. The tone was considered to be appropriate to the circumstances of this complaint. COMPLAINT procedure: When Customer Relations (CR) received the Customer's letters of 28 June and 29 July a standard Feedback Pro-Forma was completed and a letter of acknowledgement was sent on the same day. It was not within the control of CR to have responded within 2 days of the receipt of the letters by other locations in the business because of shortcomings elsewhere. Once received by them CR is considered to have acted promptly. The investigation, as described in an earlier section of this report, got underway on the 13th of August. Part of the investigation that followed was to try to establish why the letters had not been forwarded to CR on receipt at their original destination. It was evident that the CRM was, in fact, unable to determine what had been the reasons for these shortcomings that led to this situation. In a further communication (11 August) the Customer requested that his complaint be forwarded to the Independent Tier. Quite rightly, as well as replying to other questions raised, the CRM pointed out that it was not possible to do this until the complaint had been investigated through the stages of the CR complaints process. The Customer, in his communication of 12 August disputed this, regarding his letter of 28 June, as he felt that the investigations had been concluded. He received a response from AH and on 18 August sent another e-mail about an appointment that Page 4 of 4 had been arranged for 24 August, while again mentioning that he had not yet received a copy of the medical report for the examination conducted on 24 July. His questions about the 24 August appointment and his expenses were answered the same day. Regarding the investigation that was taking place, the Customer was updated on 4 September (it would have been appropriate at this stage to have given more information to the Customer - that the investigation was taking longer than expected and was therefore likely to exceed the target of 20 working days - which is, of course, allowed for in the Complaints Procedure). He then received a response letter dated 22 September. This addressed the concerns related to the 2 letters not being received hy CR until 10 August, the journey arrangements, the delayed appointment, the facilities at Highgate MEC, proof of identity, his expenses and how he could obtain a copy of his report. The Customer remained dissatisfied - his letter of 28 September refers - and requested that his case be submitted to the Independent Tier. (It is noted that a number or the issues that he wanted to be considered are outside the remit of this element of the Independent Tier, which is tasked with reviewing how complaints are handled). He received a letter of acknowledgement dated 6 October; this looked to be somewhat tardy however there was an intervening weekend. He received another on the 7th explaining the Rules agreed with the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) prevented referral to the Independent Tier at this stage and an update letter from the CRTL dated 11 November 2009 explaining that a copy of his ESASO was awaited from the DWP and once this had been received her investigation would continue. Another update letter, which again emphasised at what stage referral to the Independent Tier could take place, was sent to the Customer on 25 November (this was a response to his communication of 18 November). The full response letter was sent to the Customer on 7 January 2010 and considering the time that had elapsed since AH's previous communication, the Independent Tier feels that a further update prior to the sending or this 7 January would have been warranted. Following receipt of a further dissatisfaction letter from the Customer, his case was duly submitted to the Independent Tier for review. In the main, the Independent Tier considers that the complaint was handled in line with Procedure. One or two shortcomings were noted however, on balance, in this instance the Independent Tier considers that Atos Healthcare is FULLY SUPPORTED MJS for the Independent Tier 3 February 2010
Page 1 of 7 To: Geoffrey Hampshire Convenor to the Independent Tier Atos Origin Medical Services Wing G, Block1 Government Buildings, Otley Road, Lawnswood, Leeds LSl6 SPU Reference Number: File 432 Concerning: Customer details: Mr B... Nino: ... Examination details: Employment and Support Allowance Report conducted at Highgate Medical Centre on 24/7/2009 The Scope of this Independent review As an Independent Medical Practitioner I have a duty to supply an impartial and expert opinion on the medical content of the Incapacity Benefit report which is under consideration in this Complaint investigation. The report should satisfy the quality standards laid down by Atos Healthcare, which are: - The medical content must be medically and technically correct, with enough detail within it to support any opinions or any advised assessment. - The report must be fair and impartial. - The advice must sit within a general medical consensus view. This latter point is tested by asking this question-if other doctors examined this patient is it probable that they would offer the same opinion? I have read all the documents supplied by the Customer Relations Team. This includes the ESA report which is the subject of this complaint and all the ensuing communications between Mr B... and those members of the Customer Relations Team involved with his complaint. Page 2 of 7 Mr B...'s letters of complaint cover a broad spectrum of concerns. He has asked for a good deal of action from the Independent Tier to secure a deep investigation of general standards within Atos Healthcare. I can see the foundations of this request as he has identified much which is lacking in the management of his case. But I must confirm that a good deal of what he asks for is beyond the remit of the Medical section of the Tier. I do not consider that his complaint - based as it is on distressing personal experience- can be used as a starting point for full investigation of the principles applied in examination and assessment procedures and decisions on benefit entitlement. These procedures are governed by Legislation which allows examination by either a Secretary of State Approved and Registered Doctor or Nurse. In this instance we know that Mr B... was examined by a suitably Approved Doctor and not a Nurse. There are no Scrutiny documents within this file so we do not know who made the decision to call this claimant to examination, but be this either a doctor or a nurse the action will be within the Regulations outlining such examination arrangements. I see no point in questioning Statutory Instruments and it is not within the responsibilities of the Independent Tier to do so. There is a very real difference between breaking a law and inefficiency. I am not saying that Atos Healthcare has been inefficient - that is for others in the administrative section of the Independent Tier to decide- but more importantly I cannot see any "illegal" action within the departments put before me for this particular case. I will not enter into any wider debate. There are reasons for that- and they are that very often in such debates the claimant's case can become "lost" in side issues and ultimately that claimant is not served well. In my experience all parties are best dealt with by consideration of facts alone. Debate is always healthy but it is not appropriate in the context of this case and in my experience this sort of to--and-fro dispute rarely arrives at an agreed conclusion and often only serves to trigger more anger than is good for the patient involved. My response will be mainly focussed on the ESA report of 24/7/2009 and any other medical actions around that event. I will make recommendations at the close of that review. I will finally give some reaction to a few of the broader issues raised in Mr B...'s various letters and emails, but those will sit "outside" and will not influence my assessment of the medical actions and reporting standards for his case. From the outset in this complaint Mr B... has made it clear that he has no issue with the receptionist or the doctor who undertook his assessment at Highgate centre. I can see no stage in any of his later communications where he withdraws support for their standards. In many respects this renders superfluous the attention of the Medical Independent Tier, because our duty is to evaluate the report and ensure that a fair assessment has been provided for the DWP Decision Maker. As Mr B... is satisfied with the report my comments may prove unnecessary. Page 3 of 7 This type of report can only deal with the evidence before it on the day and cannot be expected to predict the future development of any condition. Some claimants will improve, some will deteriorate and some will remain unchanged, but that is not for any assessing and reporting doctor to predict. I appreciate at page 19 of the report there is a limited form of prognosis, but that is intended as no more than a pointer towards suitable functional review periods and is not a pure medical prognosis as we all understand it when used in the management of standard clinical conditions. So, the assessing doctor is dealing with the functional restrictions which can be shown at that particular consultation. Furthermore the examining doctor is dealing with the diagnosed conditions outlined by the GP on Medical Certification - in other words the certified cause of incapacity for work. It is always possible that the doctor could find an alternative or additional diagnosis, but that is not the purpose of the report and there are specific procedures in place to allow a doctor to take action when such an event occurs. But it did not happen in this case- Dr Ludmila Semetillo accepted and worked along with the diagnosed condition. I point this out as the standard procedure because it is something that Mr B... has raised in his letters in which he suggests that the assessment is aimed at challenging established diagnoses. This is far from the case - the intention is to build up a picture of functional ability and show the practical effects of that condition, in order to allow the Decision Maker to understand what the claimant can or cannot do. In my view this has been well executed at this examination. We should thank both Mr B... (who was fatigued and distressed by the travel arrangement and the delay at the MEC) and Dr Ludmila Semetillo (who saw this case at the end of a day and when an HCP had decided the the case was too complex to be handled by a nurse) because together they both delivered enough detail to create a full report. In certain sections the report seems generous- for example I believe that descriptor MCc at page 12 is poorly supported by the evidence in the report. But I will not criticise that because Dr Ludmila Semetillo was with this claimant and often the mental and cognitive functioning is best dealt with at face to face discussion. I therefore honour the decision to apply descriptor MCc and the other description which serve to outline the disability experienced by this claimant. I would have liked to know more about the underlying cerebral tumour but it is possible that at that point in time the full diagnosis had not been made. It is sufficient to understand that the tumour causes convulsions which can only be partially controlled by high dosages of Levetiracetam and that this in its turn causes fatigue along with other neurological symptoms. Consequently Mr B... is an ill man who also has the continuing distress which is attached to such a diagnosis. Does the report cover all possibilities in this case? There is one area of concern. When there is a diagnosed tumour we have to consider the extent and stage of the illness and if there is the possibility of terminal illness. This is always an uncomfortable subject to raise with any claimant, but it is pertinent because an individual who is terminally ill has acceptance of "Limited Capability for Work Related Activity". Such an acceptance means that the individual is not required to attend a Work Focussed interview at the DWP. Does Mr B... consider himself Terminally Ill? Only he can answer that direct question BUT there is a reference to this within his letter dated 26/9/2009 and again in his email dated 18/8/2009. As we have a direct denial of this possibility in the Page 4 of 7 ESA report at Page 17 headed "Limited Capability for Work Related Activity", I am making the assumption that this question was asked at the interview and that the terminal state was not a probability. Certainly Mr B... seems to have accepted the report in its entirety so he has therefore not disputed Dr Ludmila Semetillo's instruction that the claimant was not at that time terminally ill. Mr B... is quite right when he says that those who are terminally ill are not required to attend an examination. But in order for such protection to be put in place that state of terminal illness needs to be raised before the appointments are offered or even before the ESA 50 is completed. The usual procedure is for the claimant to be asked to obtain form DS1500 which is completed either by the GP or Consultant involved with the case. This will provide details to corroborate that death can be expected within the period of the next 6 months. 0nce such information is available then action is taken to ensure that an examination is not organised and that the claimant is protected from any other procedures. I am uncertain from the letters on file or if Mr B... considers he should not have been called for the examination or if after the examination the status of "Limited Capability for Work Related Activity" should be applied to him. But in either case such protective administrative actions require the provision of a DS1500 and I gather such a form was not made available at these early stages. I also consider - as Mr B... did not object to the content of the ESA report- that he had no objections to the entry at Page 17 and therefore did not at that stage consider himself terminally ill. If he does do so now then I can only advise he asks his GP for form DS1500 and gives that to the local branch of the DWP. Such action may have already taken place but I cannot pass this point in the report without adding my advice on that subject. It makes sound sense not to call the terminally ill forwards for examination but what about those who are ill? Are some claimants simply too ill to attend and did Mr B... fall into that category? Any HCP involved with the decision to summon for examination will only have access to the ESA 50 questionnaire which was completed by Mr B... on 12/6/2009. As Mr B... was examined shortly afterwards on 24/7/2009, the decision to call for examination was made in the short intervening period and was based on an up to date ESA 50. In it we are told of an escalation of symptoms 10 days before 12/6/2009 with a necessary doubling of the medication and that the check MRI was being brought forward on an emergency basis. Whilst that is worrying never the less there is little functional restriction outlined in the form and that may be why this claimant was called for examination. Should he have been called for examination?- this is difficult to answer, but if he made contact to say how difficult it was for him to get about it is hard to see why some form of support was not put in place for him. I am in favour of an assessment taking place in all but the more ill, provided it is because such a consultation often serves to iron out the complexities of a case, provided all efforts are made to limit stress/ pain etc. But if examinations are to take place in those who are more disabled than others then these need to be arranged with empathy. Was there not a nearer examination centre or even that chance of a domiciliary visit if it was essential that the assessment took place? If the claimant is too ill to travel then we should be asking if the examination is really necessary. It is always easy to criticise a decision to call him to Highgate and perhaps more could have been done to Page 5 of 7 avoid the distress he suffered on that day of extensive travel. He had after all described his medication- related fatigue and the deterioration in his condition. My concerns about extensive travel distances centre on illness and weakness which can limit stamina and tolerance of travel. If the policy is to medically assess most claimants then I accept that reasoning, but is there something in place to support those who are less mobile or who have troubles likely to be exacabated by travel? I would hope there is, but if so then those provisions do not seem to have moved into action for Mr B.... The organisation of examinations is well outside my remit, and that is something for the other part of the Independent Tier to consider. But medically I do have the right of a comment, and in this instance Mr B... and his condition were not served well by this process. It is thanks to Dr Ludmila Semetillo's efforts that we have a suitable report which allowed for action by the Decision Maker. We also do not have any real explanation for the further call for examination at the very same MEC on 24/8/2009 and that despite all the problems Mr B... had already listed with that journey. In this instance the claimant was more disturbed by the travel than the examination! Finally - for all those questions and actions in which Mr B...: invited the Independent Tier to partake- I hope I have made it clear that such involvement is not appropriate and not in his best interests. Whilst I cannot agree with some of his opinions, nevertheless as far as his examination arrangements and the content of his report is concerned I do support him. Recommendations Dr Ludmila Semetillo should be thanked for this detailed report which was completed under difficult conditions. There should be consideration given - and discussion with a senior mentor offered - on the evidence needed to support descriptors We and MCc. Neither of these are well supported in this report although I am sure there are reasons for this. I am not disputing the acceptance of those descriptors, they may well be the best assessment for this case- but in general a greater degree of evidential support would be expected. I also note there are areas where the detail in the typical day account is conflicting. For those reasons this report does not satisfy Atos Quality standards, although I accept the intentions behind it and consider that under the circumstances this has offered the best outcome for this particular case. I consider that the scrutiny action for this file was probably correct. I am not sure what current scrutiny guidelines recommend in such a case, but it seems quite logical to assess this case at a consultation given the evidence within the ESA50. Someone had responsibility for marking this case for examination by a doctor only. That was needed and could have reduced his wait at the MEC. I do not consider that the scrutineer could have anticipated such a long journey for that examination, because session organisation is not a medical function. I also consider it Page 6 of 7 reasonable for an HCP to assume that when such an examination is requested that the arrangements made will be suitable for the case and will therefore avoid undue distress. Finally if Mr B... considers that he should be considered for the provisions offered to those who have "Limited Capability for Work Related Activity" for reasons of Terminal Illness then I can only suggest that he asks his GP to supply a completed DS1500 form. If Mr B... is not terminally ill then I can only offer my profound apologies for the rather strong emphasis I have put on that subject in this report, but I have done it because I identified mention of the subject in one of his letters and an email. I join with others in voicing my regrets that Mr B... had such a difficult journey to the Highgate MEC and I hope that a suitable apology has been offered by Atos Healthcare. The Wider Issues raised in this Complaint from Mr B... I do not consider there is any value in responding to all of these but I will give my views on two of them. Mr B... has made several references to Dr Wright and his responsibilities and has included a copy of the referral to GMC. He asks for Independent Tier to support that GMC referral. I think that this GMC referral is unfounded and I cannot support it for the following reasons: - All doctors understand that they, as individual Practitioners, are responsible for their own Professional conduct. If a doctor makes a Professional error they cannot blame it on some one else! Certainly not Dr Wright - Secondly Dr Wright is responsible for setting and conveying the agreed Professional Standards that are required within that medical service for the DWP. He is there to ensure that those standards are given to all employed HCPs. Beyond that it is up to each individual doctor and nurse to understand and accept those standards and to ensure that their personal and Professional conduct meets those standards. - As Mr B... is not complaining about Dr Ludmila Semetillo's standards I do not understand how Dr Wright has been culpable for anything. - The wording in Atos Healthcare literature is worrying and I think we can all accept that there is no more confusing word than "customer". Whether we like the word or understand it differently is a question of semantics. I will leave that to those who have responsibilities for forms, but I cannot see that as sufficient grounds to involve the GMC. - Finally, the referral is at the start entirely between Mr B... and the GMC. It is the GMC who will decide how to investigate and what action - if any- is required. The Independent Tier can have nothing to add to that process. Page 7 of 7 Mr B... also makes reference to the BMA's intention to discuss issues around the use of non-doctors in the assessment of patients for the DWP. I am surprised at that statement. The BMA would be well aware of the use of nurses in various branches of medical assessment and in delivery of treatment. The NHS abounds with Nurse led clinics where highly trained nurses assist in the delivery of NHS care. The concept that a nurse can only provide basic care went out of fashion many years ago. Nurses are now a highly trained body of Professionals who have wider skills by far than in the past. The option for an HCP assessment is written into the Legislation for Welfare Reforms and that is a fact surely known to the BMA. Debate always has a value, but in this instance the political initiative has progressed well beyond any early consultation phase. Again the Independent Tier cannot become involved and in this case the issue does not seem relevant because Mr B... was examined by a doctor of whom he has said "I have no complaints about the receptionist or the doctor I saw. They worked well in difficult circumstances" His comment mirrors my own view of the medical aspects of this complaint, and it will be for others to decide how efficiently this case has been administered.
Letter to the Convenor to the Independent Tier stating that the legal justification for the way the Independent Tier was convened was unsound.
This letter was copied to the DWP Chief Executive.
Mr Geoff Hampshire, Convenor to the Independent Tier, Atos Healthcare Wing G - Block 1 - Government Buildings, Otley Road, Lawnswood, Leeds LS16 5PU
22 February 2010
Dear Mr Hampshire
NI Ref: ...
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
I have received your letter and attachments dated 15 February 2010. These are subject to ongoing legal considerations. I would like you to provide me with the legal justification for the process that you have authorised to take place which you claim conforms to that for the convening of an Independent Tier. I believe your legal justification is unsound and breaches the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare.
The Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare, Schedule 4 Section 4.1 PART 1 Final Version dated 15 March 2005 page 6 of 15 contains the following:
4.1.7 The CONTRACTOR shall ensure that its complaints procedure includes reference to and details of, a process that will give the Claimant or their representative the right to seek an independent review, by an independent tier, of their complaint should normal procedures not result in a satisfactory resolution.
I refer you to previous correspondence which you appear to have ignored. Again, I would like to draw your attention to a document published 23 July 2008 by the NAO for the use of the DWP (which covers the activities of Atos Healthcare) with a web site address as follows. www.nao.org.uk/publications/0708/handling_customer_complaints.aspx
I believe this defines the procedure that ought to be used. I would be happy to comply with a more recent procedure agreed by the NAO and the DWP. I have found no evidence that the DWP disputes that the DWP should comply with the NAO in this matter.
You should note that you denied me the right of representation and therefore I suggest the process that you have undertaken is legally unsound.
My understanding of Constitutional Law is that you, as an individual, risk being in contempt of Parliament if you do not comply with the NAO procedure. I further understand that you as an individual and as the Convenor to the Independent Tier is independent of the parties involved and as such has a sole duty to obey the Law. It is your duty to inform the appropriate authorities if any party is putting you under pressure to disobey the Law.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Yours sincerely
cc: Jobcentre Plus, Chief Executive
Extract from letter to Atos Healthcare asking for confirmation that they have written to the DWP that the medical advice given was unsound. In addition a new formal complaint was raised over the request for a new ESA50 form. I asked for the cheque, as the first installment of compensation, I would not trust Atos Healthcare with my financial information. They can write me a cheque as they did previously.
Ms C..., Team Leader, Customer Relations, Atos Healthcare, Wing G - Block 1 - Government Buildings, Otley Road, Lawnswood, Leeds LS16 5PU
22 February 2010
Dear Ms C...
NI Ref: ...
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Regarding our correspondence.
Please can you confirm that you have written to the DWP Decision Maker that Atos Healthcare has previously provided unsound medical advice and the position is that as outlined in your latest letter to me, a copy of which was sent to me by the Minister.
I would like to formally complain that I have received a letter from Atos Healthcare dated 28 January 2010 requesting me to complete an ESA50 form by 16 March 2010. This is clearly a mistake as Atos Healthcare is still to complete processing on the one from last year. This seems to me further evidence of Atos Healthcare incompetence and a further breach of the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare.
Please can you arrange for the compensation cheque to be sent to me as the first part of the compensation that is due.
Yours sincerely
Extract of letter to the DWP Decision Maker pointing out that Atos Healthcare supplied unsound medical advice and requests action to be undertaken as they are obliged to do under the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare.
Ms RB..., Luton BDC, Jobcentre Plus, Ascot Road, Watford WD99 1AB
22 February 2010
Dear Madame
NI Ref: ...
Regarding our previous correspondence.
Please can you confirm, in line with my request made by telephone (...) on 5 February 2010 that the DWP will provide me with a copy of the ESA50 form I completed last year.
Please can you confirm that you have received confirmation from Atos Healthcare that they provided unsound medical advice in respect of the medical information I provided both in written correspondence and the ESA50 form I completed last year. The position is as outlined in the letter from Atos Healthcare that I received directly and as a copy from the Minister.
Please can you confirm that Mr Brian Pepper, National Customer Relations Manager, Atos Healthcare has confirmed to the DWP that I have made a complaint against two (2) Atos Healthcare employees that I have suffered "assault as a consequence of examination" and that I have suffered actual "injury as a consequence of the examination" as he is required to do under Schedule 4 Section 4.1 Part 1 - Common Business Requirements 4.3 Serious Complaints clause 4.3.3 of the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare. Can you further confirm that the DWP has removed "Approval" from Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrews, Nurse or Midwife and Dr Ludmila Semetillo pending a full independent investigation by the DWP and the Police. Can the DWP consider whether Atos Healthcare's actions is an attempt to obstruct justice?
Please can you confirm that the DWP has not been charged by Atos Healthcare for the unsound medical advice they provided.
Finally can you consider what compensation is due to me for the failure by the DWP to enforce the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare and for the failings of Atos Healthcare.
Yours faithfully
Extract of letter from Atos Healthcare which contains a threat to lose benefits if the ESA50 Form is not completed. This is the same form that Atos Healthcare has had since June 2009 and has still not completed processing it.
Atos Healthcare are so incompetent they are unable to check a standard form "QR2 10/08" e.g. what does "certificates of any other documents" mean. Atos Origin is so incompetent they cannot even get the name they are supposed to use "Atos Healthcare" correct in a standard form. Look at the layout of the address.
How is it possible that the Government awards contracts to such an incompetent company? Ask your MP?
MEDICAL SERVICES Provided on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions Office address: NOTTINGHAM Atos Healthcare Summit House, Nottingham Business Park Orchard Place Nottingham NG8 6PX Reference: ... Date: 28th February 2010We need your reply urgently
Dear Mr B...
On 28th January 2010 we sent you form ESA50 ESA QUESTIONNAIRE. We need you to fill in this form so that we can see how you illness or disability affects your ability to work. We have not yet received your completed form.
What to do now
Please fill in the form and return it to the address at the top of this letter by 16th March 2010. Your benefit may be affected if you do not return the form ESA50 by the date shown without good reason. Please allow a few days for the form to reach us.
Medical certificates of any other documents must be sent directly to the office that deals with your claim. Do not enclose them with form ESA50.
Where to get help or more information
If you want to know more about why we have sent you form ESA50, or about how to complete it, or if you will be unable to complete it by the required date, please contact Jobcentre Plus office that deals with your claim. You can get the phone number by ringing 0800 055 6688 and following the instructions.
Yours sincerely,
Atos Origin
Provided by Atos Origin on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions
Registered Number 1245534
Registered Address Atos Origin IT Services UK Limited, 4 Triton Square, Regent's Place, London NW1 3HG
In February, I had the worst fit ever. I was doing some light pruning, hand shears, in the garden. I went from the vertical to the horizontal. My right leg and right arm were fitting thrashing back and forth. The pain was so bad I was yelling for someone to cut my throat to end it all. It was fortunate my noisy shredder was running. After several minutes the pain stopped just like a switch putting a light on and off. It took a long time before I could start moving my right leg and right arm again. A week later I had another lesser fit overnight. My consultant changed the dose. Slowly my right side is getting better but I am still so tired. I can now walk a few more paces without stumbling so things are getting better.
Extract of letter from Mr Brian Pepper regarding legality of the convening of the Independent Tier. This was received on the 5 March 2010 and crossed with the email I sent the following day.
MEDICAL SERVICES Date: 03/03/2010 Tel: 0113 2912602 Dear Mr B...,Thank you for your letter dated 22 February 2010 regarding the Independent Tier.
I can confirm that the Independent Tier is the final stage of the complaints process agreed with the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) in respect of the medical services contract.
I note your reference to the NAO report and I do not consider the complaints process to be legally unsound. Atos Healthcare works with the DWP to continually improve our processes in the light of customer and other feedback.
Yours sincerely
Brian Pepper
National Customer Relations Manager
Extract of email sent to Customer Relations, Atos Healthcare pointing out their breach of the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare as my formal complaint of the 22 February had not been acknowledged.
I received a letter from Atos dated 28 February 2010 which followed my letter dated 22 February 2010 (as attached) and which responded to your letter dated 28 January 2010. Both letters from Atos were sent in error. As I have responded to these letters, Atos should agree that I do not need to respond again to further letters sent in error relating to the substance of these letters sent in error. You should note my formal complaint in my letter. I have not yet received a written acknowledgement of my complaint which Atos is contracted to do within two (2) days as specified in the Contract between the DWP and Atos. I have published extracts of this contract on my website http://www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatos.html . Please can you investigate and report this breach of Contract by Atos to the DWP. For information, I attach the most recent letter I wrote to the DWP Decision Maker. I also attach the most recent letter I sent to the GMC. I hope this clarifies matters, please contact me if you need further help from me.
Thank you
The letter to the GMC is published in the Government correspondence page.
Extract of letter from Customer Relations, Atos Healthcare.
Dear Mr B...,
I write in response to your e-mail of 4th March to Atos Healthcare's Customer Relations inbox.
In response to your concerns about having received an Employment and Support Allowance questionnaire (ESA50) recently, I have discussed the matter with JobcentrePlus in Luton who have confirmed that your case has been referred to Atos Healthcare following a 6 month review period, as indicared in the prognosis section of the ESA85 dated 24th July 2009.
Should you have any concerns regarding this, may I suggest you contact Luton Benefit Delivery Centre who will be best placed to help you. They can be contacted on 0845 6088627.
Yours sincerely
Extract of letter from Customer Relations, Atos Healthcare.
Incapacity Benefit - Jobcentre Plus Luton BDC, Ascot Road, Watford. WD99 lAB Telephone O845 6O8 8627 Website: www.jobcentreplus.gov.uk Date: 19/03/10 National Insurance No: ... Dear Mr B...,Re: Your recent letter received on 24/02/10
Thank you for your recent letter requesting a copy of form ESA 50 which you signed on 12/06/2009. I have now received your paperwork and enclose a copy as requested.
With regard to your concerns about ATOS Healthcare, I have referred your letter to the Office of Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire District Office, for the attention of the District Manager Ms T... and you will receive a reply in the very near future.
Another ESA 50 questionnaire was sent to you on 28/01/10 for completion and return, if you have not posted the form back yet, could you please now return the form to Jobcentre Plus, Luton BDC, Ascot Road, Watford WD99 1AB,
Yours sincerely,
Mrs G..., ESA WCA Team Leader, Luton BDC
Extract of letter to Customer Relations, Atos Healthcare.
Re: Your letter dated 19 March 2010
I refer you to my letter to Ms Isabel Letwin, Acting Director General, DWP The Legal Group dated 10 March 2010 to which I have not yet received a reply. You will note that the ESA50 questionnaire dated 28 January 2010 should NOT have been sent out by the DWP. Atos provided unsound medical advice to the DWP. Please update your records.
You should note that my medical condition has deteriorated since the ESA50 questionnaire which the DWP received 15 June 2009 and which has still to be processed by Atos Healthcare. My anti-fit medicine dose has been tripled and in the last two days I have had 3 fits, extreme pain and loss of use of right arm and leg for varying periods of time. For most of the day I am bed ridden. There are periods when I can move around unaided and walk a dozen yards without hanging on to things. Climbing stairs and using the toilet alone is problematic.
My consultant is now .... My patient hospital number is .... He has scheduled to see me ... after my next MRI scan, still to be scheduled in .... He has said that I am to expect fits (epilepsy partialis continua) and should take the pain. He has not given me medicine to minimise the pain during a fit.
I have no strength. I can no longer write due to twitches. If the DWP does require me to complete the ESA50 questionnaire again, I would be pleased if the DWP completes it for me, using the information as in the 15 June 2009 version and the above, and sends it to me so that I can check it and sign it.
I hope this addresses matters. I ask you to let my treatment proceed without the DWP hurting me further and if things turn out as I expect to let me die in peace. I cannot believe I paid 30 years tax and NI to receive such treatment from the DWP. For shame.
Yours sincerely
Extract of email to Customer Relations, Atos Healthcare.
Further to my complaint sent by email on 4 March.
I received a letter dated 11 March 2010 from Ms C..., Team Leader Customer Relations in which she states that she has discussed an ESA85 form dated 24 July 2009 with the DWP. I would like to further complain that as she wrote a letter to the Minister that this particular form provided unsound medical advice, she is now claiming that this unsound document is a valid reason for requesting that a new ESA50 questionnaire needs to be completed. Please can you investigate this matter. A reasonable person might conclude that Ms C... is at best forgetful or at worse dishonest.
My second complaint is that I have still not received the money Atos promised to pay me.
As specified in the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare you should acknowledge my complaint in writing in 2 days and resolve the matter within 20 days. The Contract also states new complaints should not be handled by Atos individuals who have been involved in a previous complaint by a claimant.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Thank you
Extract of email from Customer Relations, Atos Healthcare.
Mr B...,
We are currently considering the content of your e-mail and hope to be in a position to provide you with a response shortly.
Regards,
Customer Relations
What an improvement? An email acknowledgement that complies with the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare. Maybe the DWP is finally taking the repeated breaches of contract by Atos Origin seriously. For an "IT company" it is trivial to implement an automatic email acknowledgement system. Atos Origin produce such poor IT systems that they cannot implement an automatic email acknowledgement system.
Extract of letter from Customer Relations, Atos Healthcare.
MEDICAL SERVICES 25/03/2010 Tel: 0113 2309285 fax: O113 2671832 Dear Mr B...,Thank you for your complaint dated 24th March 2010
A referral has been received from the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) which automatically prompts the issue of a form ESA50. This is the agreed process with the DWP.
If you have concerns about the appropriateness of this referral and ESA50 please contact the office of the DWP dealing with your claim.
As you now indicate that you would like to accept the consolatory payment, I am happy to process this if you complete the attached proforma and return it in the pre-paid envelope provided.
Yours sincerely
Brian Pepper National Customer Relations Manager Atos Healthcare 1. Without Prejudice Dear Mr B..., Ref: ... Atos Healthcare's offer of £100.00 is contained in the letter to which this form is an attachment, without prejudice to previous or future correspondence from Atos Healthcare. Payment will be made by BACS transfer, directly into your bank account. We will therefore, require the following information from you. Name of account holder: Bank account number: Bank sort code: If you wish to accept this consolatory payment, please sign below: I accept the payment of £100.OO I understand that payment will be made upon receipt of the signed form. Signed: Date:
Extract of email to Customer Relations, Atos Healthcare.
Further to my complaint sent by email on 4 March and my reminder sent by email 24 March 2010. I appreciate you acknowledged my 24 March 2010 email on the same day. I hope you are finally tackling some of the incompetence and neglect that blights the reputation of Atos Origin. An automatic email acknowledgement application should not be too difficult for an IT company even with the poor reputation of Atos Origin.
I remind you that the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare explicitly states new complaints should not be handled by Atos individuals who have been involved in a previous complaint by a claimant. As a previous complaint has been handled by Ms C..., Team Leader, Customer Relations and by Mr Brian Pepper, National Customer Relations Manager, these individuals should NOT be involved in this complaint. I have received a letter from Mr Brian Pepper dated 25 March which is a gross breach of the Contract in this respect. I would like to formally complain about this new breach of Contract.
I expect a letter of apology to include confirmation that Atos Healthcare has written to the DWP with the information that they provided the Minister, including the fact that they provided unsound medical advice. I would like confirmation from Atos Healthcare that Dr Bruecker has written to the DWP placing me into the support group as it is over 2 months after the letter dated 7 January which Atos Healthcare sent to the Minister which covered this point. The DWP has not confirmed that they have received this advice. A reasonable person might conclude that Atos is either forgetful, negligent or dishonest in the information that they have provided to the Minister and or to the DWP.
Finally I have still not received the cheque that Atos promised the Minister that they would send to me. Please note Atos previously sent me a cheque for my travelling expenses. I insist Atos send me a cheque or provide me with the legal justification or change in regulation that has been passed since Atos sent me a cheque last year. I have so little confidence in Atos Healthcare that I am reluctant to provide my confidential bank details. I recall the recent loss of confidential information by Atos Origin and other major errors by Atos Origin. Atos can if it wishes send the money to the DWP and they can credit my bank account. I cannot believe that the computer systems of Atos Origin are so inadequate or the Atos Origin financial credit rating is so poor that Atos Origin is unable to write a cheque, even for such a small amount.
As specified in the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare you should acknowledge my additional complaint in writing in 2 days and resolve the matter within 20 days.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Thank you
March was the worst month. I was being hit by three fits a day. It takes at least 24 hours to start to recover. It does not take an engineer to work out the sands of time are running out fast. So what is a brain tumour fit. If awake, I fall over, like poleaxed. Then my right arm and right leg thrash back and forth with so much pain I yell for someone to cut my throat. If asleep I am waken by the pain. It lasts for a few minutes and then my right arm and leg are dead for up to an hour. I twitch on and off and then another fit occurs. The good news is diazepam (vallium). The muscles seem more relaxed and I do not feel so tired. Still very very very tired but no fits for over ten days. I have to drag my right leg everywhere and my writing is very poor. I can just about sign a letter. And Atos have just asked me again to fill out another 26 page ESA50 form by hand. Is it possible that Atos Origin is just being vexatious so that I am pushed over the edge?
Extract of letter from Michelle Monroe, Freedom of Information Officer, DWP.
Here she confirms that Atos Origin misled the Minister. Here she confirms the breaches by Atos of the Contract between the DWP and Atos Origin. She states as facts statements that directly contradict other information previously provided by Atos Origin and that provided by the "Atos" Independent Tier.
I am not sure why she keeps mentioning mental health issues the Contract lists specific medical conditions including cancer. The Contract is specific that Atos provides medical advice. The DWP Decision maker is not empowered to request that a face to face assessment should be made. This is why the DWP spends a fortune on training Atos staff. My case shows what a waste of money is spent by the DWP;
I am sad she has to work with such a dismal depressing company as Atos Origin.
Department for Work and Pensions Commercial Directorate Our address Medical Services Contract Management Team North Fylde Central Office Norcross Block 3 Room 306 Blackpool FY5 3TA Our phone number 01253 611552 Email: DWP.MEDICALSERVICESCORRESPONDENCE@DWP.GSI.GOV.UK Date: 7x April 2010 Our Ref: FOI 1229-0260Dear Mr B...
Thank you for your email received 22/01/10 in which you ask for further information in connection with Atos Healthcare under the Freedom of Information Act.
You asked if I "have been told by Atos Healthcare the following facts":-
"That Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrews is a nurse?", and that she is not qualified in neuroscience, neurosurgery or neurology, pathology or the treatment or primary brain tumour. The information previously supplied to you regarding Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrews' primary and/or specialist qualifications confirms that she is registered with the Nursing and Midwifey Council (NMC). This registration occurred prior to her employment by Atos Healthcare and her subsequent approval by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) Chief Medical Adviser (CMA) to conduct assessments on behalf of DWP. This information was obtained From the NMC's website www.nmc-uk.oro using her reference number .... In addition, all healthcare professional's (HCP) are required to engage in a programme of continuing medical education which includes modules on mental health issues. They are monitored to ensure that their work meets the required quality standards. If a problem is identified, the HCP may be required to undertake tailored training, which may involve training in mental health issues if required.
"That she (Nurse Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrews) decided that a medical assessment was required in your case." This is incorrect as your assessment was undertaken at the request of Jobcentreplus. Referrals to Atos Healthcare for assessments in relation to the processing of a benefit claim are requested by the DWP's Decision Maker dealing with the individuals claim for benefit.
That she requested the Cardiff office to arrange the assessment. You asked if her work was not reviewed or checked by her manager or others responsible for quality, audit and compliance. Atos have confirmed that Nurse Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrews' work on this particular case was not reviewed or checked by her manager or others responsible for quality, audit and compliance. All HCPs are monitored to ensure that their work meets the required quality standards. If a problem is identified, the healthcare professional may be required to undertake tailored training, which may involve training in mental health issues if required.
Our records show that your assessment was arranged to take place at Highgate Medical Examination Centre (MEC), 1 Elthorne Rd, London. All requests for referrals are made by the DWP Benefit Delivey Centre, which registers referrals on a computer system. At this stage a MEC is automatically allocated by the referral system, which is based on the customer's postcode. In your case because your postcode is ... the referral system allocated you to Highgate MEC. There were 2 other MECs - Luton and Romford which, in hindsight, could possibly have been used, however, in both cases "Transport Direct" (a government web site intended to help people using public transport to plan their journeys) states that the journey times using public transport to both were equal or longer than the journey time to Highgate. Atos provides information from this website to customers; this is in addition to their own location map of the Medical Examination Centre. The provision of transport details is over and above Atos' contractual obligations but is an example of the continuing improvements to the service they provide for their customers. The Cardiff office was involved in your referral because it is responsible for booking appointments for a proportion of the assessment centres within the UK, the appointment letters which are then generated are issued through a centralised printing system.
Whilst Atos continuously review the information they provide to customers, "Transport Direct" is not a source of information that is within their sphere of responsibility and, as such, they are unable to amend or change the information in any way. Therefore, an agreed disclaimer has been added to the journey planner as neither the DWP nor Atos can be held responsible for any erroneous details the website pages may contain.
You asked for the General Medical Council Number of Dr Bruecker? Dr Bruecker's GMC reference number is 4052733 and his primary qualifications are held in the public domain and appear on the GMC's website www.gmc-uk.org then click on "check a doctor's registration" and completion of the appropriate fields. I can advise you that in order to provide independent, accurate and authoritative advice and reports it is not necessary for HCPs to hold specialist registration with the General Medical Council
You asked if Nurse Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrews and Dr Ludmila Semetillo have attended and passed the training courses. The DWP CMA approves HCPs to carry out assessments. Approval is dependent on strict recruitment criteria and completion of a course of training in disability assessment medicine approved by the CMA and evidence of satisfactory performance.
You requested the contract schedule 4.1 Part 2 5.1, and commented upon the standard of written and verbal English used by Dr Ludmila Semetillo. I can confirm Atos did forward your request to this Office for a copy of the contract schedule 4.1 Part 2 5. 1 , a further copy of which is attached for your information. I can advise that there are no circumstances in which a doctor would be appointed by Atos Healthcare who wasn't able to communicate in good English. The Atos Healthcare contract of employment is very specific in that HCPs who apply to work for Atos Healthcare must be able to demonstrate a good command of the English Language on a day to day basis.
You asked for clarification over who is the Convenor of The Independent Tier (IT)? I can confirm that Gemma Bowes, Geoff Hampshire and other members of Atos Healthcare's National Customer Relations Team (NCRT) may all act as Convenor's to the IT.
You asked for confirmation that DWP will attend the hearing of the Independent Tier I would advise you that it is not the role of the IT to hear new evidence, neither do they hold a hearing to discuss the complaints. When a customer requests a referral to the IT, Atos forward all documents held, to the IT, who then conduct a review. The IT is there to allow customers an opportunity to have an independent review of the way Atos Healthcare has handled their complaint. The customer can ask for their complaint to be referred to the Independent Tier which is a private, reputable firm, with no connection to Atos Healthcare or any other interested parties. Their role is to review how Atos Healthcare have handled the complaint, examine how they conducted the investigation into the complaint and ensure that all the issues raised have been responded to.
The Independent Tier is not able to express a different medical opinion or comment on the outcome of a claim to benefit.
You said you noted that there had been a refusal for the Medical Services Contract Management Team to provide the information you requested regarding the IT and that you have requested this from Mr Hampshire. I note that the IT wrote to you on 15 February could you please clarify what further information you require regarding the IT.
You asked why the contract between DWP and Atos Healthcare is not available online. The Medical Services Contract Agreement is only available in hard copy format to protect the public interest by ensuring that the commercially sensitive information which has been necessarily withheld under Section 43 of the Freedom of Information Act cannot be retrieved in anyway through electronic means.
You asked me to let you hnow if there are any errors or corrections to the correspondence you have published on www.whywaitforever.com. Please note that neither DWP nor those contracted to provide services to the Department are responsible for content or maintenance of information published on sources external to DWP.
If you have any queries about this letter please contact me quoting the reference number above.
Yours sincerely
Michelle Munro
Freedom of Information Officer
Your right to complain under the Freedom of Information Act
If you are not happy with this response you may request an internal review by e-mailing freedom-of-information-request@dwp.gsi.gov.uk. or by writing to DWP, Central Fol Team, 2nd Floor The Adelphi, 1-11 John Adam Street, London WC2N 6HT. Any review request should be submitted within two months of the date of this letter.
If you are not content with the outcome of the internal review you may apply directly to the Information Commissioner's Office for a decision. Generally the Commissioner cannot make a decision unless you have exhausted our own complaints procedure. The Information Commissioner can be contacted at: The Information Commissioner's Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow Cheshire SK9 5AF www.ico.gov.uk
It is an outrage that Doctors are allowed to practice in the UK without being able to speak and write "medical" English. See http://www.gmc-uk.org/doctors/registration_applications/language_proficiency.asp.
Extract of letter from Carolyn Taylor, District Manager Jobcentre Plus, Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire, DWP. She states "We do not however, have any jurisdiction over Atos Healthhcare".
Jobcentre Plus Office of the District Manager Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire District Beauver House 6 Bricket Road St Albans AL1 3JU Telephone 01727 773312 www.jobcentreplus.gov.uk 12 April 2010Dear Mr B...
Thank you for your letters of 22 February and 22 March. They have been passed to me to reply as District Manager of Jobcentre Plus for Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire.
I can confirm that we have sent you a copy of the ESA50 you requested. I can also confirm that we are aware that you have made a complaint against Atos Healthcare. We do not however, have any jurisdiction over Atos Healthcare, their personnel or their actions. You will also appreciate that I cannot discuss with you the department's contract with Atos Healthcare
We and Atos Healthcare do take all complaints about the level of service provided very seriously and your complaint will be fully investigated. However, we are continuing to use Atos Healthcare as our medical advisers at present and as such have forwarded them a copy of your letter of 22 March to consider in place of a further ESA50. I am sorry to read of your deteriorating health, we have no intention to cause you more stress at this time but we do need professional medical advice concerning all customers in receipt of Employment and Support Allowance. This helps us to ensure that you are given the correct amount of benefit you are entitled to at the correct time
If you require any further information please contact Bonita Murphy, Employment and Support Allowance Manager at Luton Benefit Delivery Centre (BDC). Bonita can be contacted by post at Jobcentre Plus, Luton BDC, Ascot Road, Watford, WD99 1AB or by telephone on 01582
Yours sincerely
Carolyn Taylor, District Manager Jobcentre Plus, Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire
Part of the Department for Work and Pensions
Notice how she refused to answer the direct questions. Unbelievable.
Extract of letter dated 13 April (received 21 April) from Michelle Monroe, Freedom of Information Officer, DWP together with another copy of the 7 April letter. Baffling.
Department for Work and Pensions Commercial Directorate Our address Medical Services Contract Management Team North Fylde Central Office Norcross Block 3 Room 306 Blackpool FY5 3TA Our phone number 01253 611552 Email: DWP.MEDICAL.SERVICESCORRESPONDENCE@DWP.GSI.GOV.UK Date 13 April 2010 Our Ref FOI: 1310-713Dear Mr B...
Thank you for your Freedom of Information request received on 12 March 2010 which I am responding to in my role as Department for Work and Pensions (DWP)'s Medical Services Freedom of Information Officer.
You asked for:- Extracts of the Contract between DWP & ATOS Healthcare which had previously been supplied.
In accordance with Section 14(2) of the Freedom of Information Act, the Deparment is not obliged to comply with a subsequent identical or substantially similar request it has previously responded to. The letter of the Freedom of Information Officer Ms M Munro dated 7 April (FOI 1229-260) which I have attached for information refers.
Your request for information under the Data Protection Act is being considered by the Medical Services Contract Management Team Data Protection Officer and you will receive a response in due course.
If you have any queries about this letter please contact me quoting the reference numoer above.
Yours sincerely
Michelle Munro
Freedom of Information Officer
Your right to complain under the Freedom of Information Act
If you are not happy with this response you may request an internal review by e-mailing freedom-of-information-request@dwp.gsi.gov.uk. or by writing to DWP, Central Fol Team, 2nd Floor The Adelphi, 1-11 John Adam Street, London WC2N 6HT. Any review request should be submitted within two months of the date of this letter.
If you are not content with the outcome of the internal review you may apply directly to the Information Commissioner's Office for a decision. Generally the Commissioner cannot make a decision unless you have exhausted our own complaints procedure. The Information Commissioner can be contacted at: The Information Commissioner's Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow Cheshire SK9 5AF www.ico.gov.uk
Extract of letter dated 26 April (received 28 April) from Jim Fay, Data Protection Officer, DWP together with yet more copies of 7 January and 15 February letters. Baffling.
Our address DWP Government Buildings Norcross Norcross Lane Thornton FY5 3TA Our phone number 01253 611537 Email: DWP DWP Medical Services Correspondence Date: 26/04/2010 Ref: 2344 Dear Mr B... About your request for information under the Data Protection Act 1998 You contacted us asking for a copy of the personal information we hold about you. A letter dated 7th January 2010 from Ms C... (Team Leader Customer Relations) A letter dated 15th February 2010 from Mr Geoff Hampshire (Convenor to the Independent Tier)I am enclosing the information held by Atos Healthcare (the DWP's Medical Services Contractor).
You might receive further information from other parts of the Department if your request covers records held at more than one location.
The DWP office dealing with the benefit holds copies of any medical reports required.
The Data Protection Act 1998 states that in some circumstances your right to see certain information is limited. This includes information relating to health; the way crime is detected and prevented and; the assessing or collecting of taxes or duty and third party information. If an exemption applies this information will be blocked on the enclosed papers.
Please note that because of our policy not to keep personal information when we no longer have a business need for it, we may no longer hold some information.
If you would like any further information please do not hesitate to contact me.
Yours sincerely
PP Doreen Hopwood, Jim Fay, Data Protection Officer
Extract of email sent to Atos Healthcare asking for progress on the email sent 4 March 2010.
Re: Progress on Complaint made 4 March 2010
I have still neither had a written acknowledgement of the email of the 4 March nor have I have received the cheque that Atos Origin promised the Minister that they would send me as Atos Origin agreed in a copy of letter they sent to the Minister which was dated 7 January 2010.
Please can you update me with progress.
Thank you.
Medically April was a bad month. Each day I feel worse.
Extract of email sent by Atos Healthcare confirming breach of contract in that it is from Ms C...Team Leader, Customer Relations and as she is subject to a previous complaint she should no longer be involved in this case. Atos Origin feel able to breach contracts with immunity.
Re: Progress on Complaint made 4 March 2010
Mr B...,
I write in response to your e-mail below. Please accept my apologies for the delay in doing so.
I can confirm that we will make arrangements for the consolatory payment of £100 to be sent to you. This was offered in our letter dated 7th January 2010, although you did not indicate acceptance at that time.
Your complaint has been dealt with in accordance with our complaints process, including the Independent Tier. Atos Healthcare will not will not be replying to issues of dissatisfaction or queries in connection with your complaint as any further communication should be with Jobcentre Plus as explained in our letter dated 15th February 2010.
Regards,
Ms C..., Customer Relations Team, Atos Healthcare
We will see how long it is before I receive the cheque.
Letter from Ms RB..., DWP Luton BDC, Jobcentre Plus placing me in the ESA Support Group. No explanation. No apologies for taking so long after knowing that the Atos Healthcare medical advice was unsound and a libel.
Luton BDC Jobcentre Plus Ascot Road Watford WD99 1AB Phone 0845 6088627 TEXTPHONE for the deaf/hard of hearing ONLY 0845 6O88619 Date 5 May 2010 Dear Mr B... YOUR CLAIM FOR EMPLOYMENT AND SUPPORT ALLOWANCE A CHANGE IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND SUPPORT ALLOWANCE RATE PAYABLE We have looked at your claim again following a recent change. From 29 April 2010 your Employment and Support Allowance will be £96.85 a week. This is because of: a decision on your capability for work. You have moved from the Work Related Activity Group to the Support Group Your circumstances mean you will qualify for a Christmas Bonus Payment. This will be paid the first week in December. The amount payable is £10.OO We will credit you with National Insurance contributions while claiming Employment and Support Allowance. You are required to immediately report any change in your circumstances to us, or the circumstances of your partner if you have one. The attached sheet shows how we worked out your money. If you want more information please get in touch with us. Our phone number and address are at the top of this letter. This assessment is based on your National Insurance Contribution Record. HOW THE MONEY WILL BE PAID The money will be paid every two weeks for as long as you are still entitled to Employment and Support Allowance. Bank/Building society: ... We also hold an account number/sort code but for security reasons they have not been included in this letter. We will pay your Employment and Support Allowance into your account. (Your account details are known to us but have not been stated in this letter for security reasons. Any payments made to you will be paid into this account. Tell us straight away if your account details change.) PAYMENT TO YOUR BANK/BUILDING SOCIETY These notes are about allowance payments into a bank or building society account. Please make sure you read them. You must tell us straight away if any details about the account change. Otherwise You may not be able to get your money. You should check the account to see how much is paid in. We will tell you if your Employment and Support Allowance is going to change. If you think the payment is wrong, you should get in touch with us straight away. We will check your payment and tell you what will happen. If your money is due on a Bank Holiday we will pay it into the account on the last weekday before the Bank Holiday. If the account goes overdrawn, the bank or building society may not let you take any money out of the account. Talk to the bank or building society if this happens. You should also tell us as we can change how we pay you. If you want a full explanation of why your Emptoyment and Support Allowance has changed, please get in touch with us. Our phone number and address are at the top of this letter. OTHER HELP YOU MAY BE ENTITLED TO You may be entitled to other help. To find out more about this ask us for leaflet INF2 "Other help you may be entitled to" HOUSING BENEFIT AND COUNCIL TAX BENEFIT You could get Housing Benefit or Council Tax Benefit. Get in touch with your local council as soon as possible. If you are already getting Housing Benefit or Council Tax Benefit you should show them this letter. IF YOU WANT TO KNOW MORE ABOUT THIS DECISION OR IF YOU THINK IT IS WRONG Please contact us and we will give an explanation. Our address and phone number are at the top of this letter. You should contact us within one month of the date of this letter, or we may not be able to consider any dispute. WHAT HAPPENS AFTER THE DECISION IS LOOKED AT AGAIN If the decision can be changed we will send you a new decision. If we cannot change the decision we will tell you why. You will still have the right of appeal against the decision. HOW TO APPEAL To appeal, fill in the form in leaflet GL24 "If you think our decision is wrong". Please send it to us within one month of the date of this letter. You can get this leaflet from your Jobcentre Plus Office. Your appeal will be heard by an independent appeal tribunal. If the decision is wrong, the independent appeal tribunal can change it. But the independent appeal tribunal cannot: - change the law that the decision is based on; - pay more money than the law allows; - check or change your contribution record. If you disagree with our record of your contributions, please tell us at once. We will check your records and tell you the result. If you still disagree you can ask for a formal decision. Jobcentre Plus staff work to offer a complete service through your Jobcentre. If you have an enquiry about your claim for Employment and Support Allowance you will be referred to the Decision Maker or appeals section. PLEASE KEEP THIS LETTER FOR YOUR INFORMATION It will help us if you have this letter when you make any enquiries or need an explanation about the decision. How Employment and Support Allowance has been worked out The Employment and Support Allowance Award The payment of Employment and Support Allowance is based on your National Insurance Contribution records and any additional amount the law says you need to live on. We call this Contributory based and Income Related Employment and Support Allowance. Your living expenses £65.45 Limited capability for work addition Extra Money because you are in £31.40 the Support Group Which gives a total £96.85 Employment and Support Allowance amount Income and Benefits No income will be taken off your Employment and Support Allowance Your Employment and Support Allowance amount of £96.85 less total income of £0.00 So your entitlement is £96.85 The amounts on this page apply from 29 April 2010 to 1 December 2010. Yours sincerely Ms RB... Manager
Letter to Ms RB..., DWP Luton BDC, Jobcentre Plus requesting a copy of the medical advice and asking for money owed due to the unsound medical advice previously provided by Atos Healthcare.
Dear Madam
NI Ref: ... WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Regarding your letter dated 5 May 2010.
Please can you send me a copy of the medical advice you received from Atos Healthcare on which you based your decision.
I am not in a position to decide whether an appeal should be made until I have received a copy of the medical advice and have had time to review it. Unfortunately your letter states that an appeal requires the form in leaflet GL24 needs to be completed within one month of 5 May 2010. Please can you supply a copy of the medical advice and then give me one month from that time to decide whether to appeal.
If you recall, I wrote to the Luton BDC on the 15 August 2009 for a copy of leaflet GL24. My letter was ignored. I do not believe at that time the form was available online. I am pleased to note that this 28 page form is now available on line www.direct.gov.uk/appeals.
You are aware that your letter dated 29 July 2009 placing me in a Work Related Activity Group was based on unsound medical advice provided by Atos Healthcare. Atos Healthcare in a letter to the Right Honourable Jonathan Shaw MP, Minister for Disabled People dated 27 January 2010 implicitly agreed that the information that Atos Healthcare provided you was unsound medical advice and as such constituted a libel. The DWP Legal Group is taking action on the breaches of contract by Atos Healthcare and other matters.
Please can you recalculate the amounts I should have received if I had correctly been placed in a Support Group from 16 July 2009. Please can you let me know the additional sums including any Christmas Bonus Payment that I should have been paid and arrange for the additional amount to be paid into my account.
Thank you.
Yours faithfully
Letter from Atos Origin IT Services UK Ltd on behalf of the Benefits Agency. You can see how incompetent Atos Origin are. This is a cheque they should be paying from their funds as it is their mistake. I have had no dealings with the Benefits Agency, what ever that might be. The letter is wrong as the payment is not related to expenses claimed following the recent medical examination. The letter implies that they are going to charge the DWP for this payment. A reasonable person would conclude that this is a fraud perpertrated by Atos Origin. What a shower?
Medical Services PROVIDED BY ATOS ORIGIN IT SERVICES UK ON BEHALF OF THE BENEFITS AGENCY NI No: ... Date: 19/05/2010 Ref. No: 44369 The enclosed cheque is in respect of the expenses claimed folloving your recent medical examination. Document Reference Date Deductions Gross Amount 52933 ... 19.05.2010 0.00 100.00 Sum Total 0.00 100.00 Any queries relating to this payment should be made to the Medical Service Centre which issued your appointment, quoting your National Insurance Number. Birmingham 0114 259 0018 Leeds 0114 259 0018 Bootle 0151 934 6091 Manchester 0161 831 2080 Bristol 0117 971 8317 Newcastle 01264 837 778 Cardiff 029 2058 6726 Nottingham 0115 975 8353 Croydon 020 8633 1352 Wembley 020 8795 8706 Edinburgh 01463 256 500 Glasgow 01463 256 500 ATOS Origin IT Services UK Ltd - Room 200 - Albert Bridge House - Manchester - M60 9DA Registered Office 4 Triton Square Regents Place London NW1 3HG - Registered Number: 1245534 England
The following are the details of the bank account that Atos Origin IT Services UK Ltd are using. It is for the DWP to review and audit that they have used the correct account.
The front of the cheque (desensitised with my name removed).
The reverse of the cheque.
Letter from the DWP Medical Services Contract Management Team who are replying to my letter dated 10 March 2010 to the DWP Legal Group.
Department for Work and Pensions Commercial Directorate Our address Medical Services Contract Management Team North Fylde Central Office Norcross Block 3 Room 306 Blackpool FY5 3TA Our phone number 01253 611552 Email: DWP.MEDICALSERVICESCORRESPONDENCE@DWP.GSI.GOV.UK Date: 26 May 2010 Our Ref: FOI 1333-858 Dear Mr B... Thank you for your letter dated 10 March 2010, which was addressed to Isabel Letwin and has been forwarded to me to respond to on behalf of the Department. In your letter you requested the following information: - Can you provide me the legal justification that supports the refusal of Atos to use the services of the Independent Case Examiner as recommended by the National Audit Office (NAO)? - Can you tell me who is responsible for the management of the Contract between Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) and Atos? - Who audits that the Contract is managed? - Can you explain why no action has been taken over my serious complaint of assault and injury by Atos personnel? - Can you explain why the "Approval" has not yet been removed by the DWP from the individuals complained of? - Can you confirm that Atos has refunded the DWP for the unsound medical advice they provided to the DWP? - Can you tell me when the DWP Decision maker will be able to make a decision based on sound medical advice in line with that outlined by Atos doctor Dr Bruecker? - Can you investigate if Atos, in particular Mr Brian Pepper, has obstructed justice in that Atos provided information to the Minister that the ESA information was reviewed by a qualified HCP prior to deciding a face to face interview was necessary? In answer to your questions: - Atos have not made use of the services of the Independent Case Examiner (ICE) as this is an independent organisation, acting as a referee for people who feel that Government Agencies or Businesses have not treated them fairly in relation to their benefit entitlement. Atos Healthcare have advised that you have now completed their own complaints process. However, if you are dissatisfied with the outcome of the review into your complaint conducted by the Independent Tier (IT), you should contact them via the Convenor to the IT. If you are unhappy with the outcome of your benefit decision you shoutd contact the DWP Decision Maker. - Management of the contract Detween DWP and Atos is undertaken by the Commercial Directorate via its Medical Services Contract Management Team, who are based in Norcross. - The Medical Services Contract Management Team, on behalf of the DWP, manages all aspects of Atos Healthcare's performance and service delivey. The current contractual agreement bemeen DWP and Atos Healthcare contains numerous performance targets covering a wide range of features including throughput, customer service and medical quality. Regular audits are undertaken by the Departmental Audit team to ensure that all commercial contracts are being managed effectively. - Atos have advised that they do not consider that an allegation of assault is valid or can be investigated as their HCP conducted the assessment in accordance with Professional Standards - which has been confirmed Dy the Independent Tier. (IT); and by a statement made in your first letter "I have no complaints about the receptionist or the doctor I saw. They worked well under difficult circumstances. - Atos note that you have complained direct to the GMC and they will take a view on whether to investigate any issues that you have raised. DWP would not look to take action until after the GMC has determined if there is a case to answer and have fully investigated that complaint. - I can confirm that Atos have not been requested to refund MSCMT for the cost of your assessment, as the DWP Decision Maker has not requested another assessment. - I would advise that you contact the Decision Maker at Luton BDC for your current benefit position. - The complaint you have made against Mr Pepper is Deing considered by the Medical Services Contract Management Team. If you have any queries about this letter please contact me quotingh the reference number above. Youn sincerely James Fay Freedom of Information Officer ----------------------------------------------------------- Your right to complain under the Freedom of Information Act If you are not happy with this response you may request an internal review by e-mailing freedom-of-information-request@dwp.gsi.gov.uk by writing to DWP , Central FoI Team, 5th Floor The Adelphi, 1-11 John Adam Street, London WC2N 6HT. Any review request should be submitted within two months of the date of this letter. If you are not content with the outcome of the internal review you may apply directly to the Information Commissioner's Office for a decision. Generally the Commissioner cannot make a decision unless you have exhausted our own complaints procedure. The Information Commissioner can be contacted at: The Information Commissioner's Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow Cheshire SK9 5AF www.ico.gov.uk
I do not think that the questions have been answered. Atos provides unsound medical advice which is libellous and in spite of the contract the DWP pays them for this advice. A reasonable person might suspect undue influence at work here.
Letter to the DWP Medical Services Contract Management Team asking them to address all the matters raised in my letter dated 10 March 2010 to the DWP Legal Group.
Mr James Fay Freedom of Information Officer DWP Medical Services Contract Management Team North Fylde Central Office Norcross Block 3 Room 306 Blackpool FY5 3TA 27 May 2010 Dear Mr Fay NI Ref: ... WITHOUT PREJUDICERegarding your reference FOI 1333-858 your letter dated 26 May 2010 (www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatosletters.html#DWP20100526F). I feel you have addressed only in part the matters I raised in my letter dated 10 March 2010 (www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatoslettersgov.html#DWP20100310T) addressed to Ms Isabel Letwin. Please note in line with Government policy I have provided documents in electronic form and have supplied you with the web addresses.
You have agreed that the DWP and its contractor Atos has ignored the recommendation of the National Audit Office. www.nao.org.uk/publications/0708/handling_customer_complaints.aspx I asked you to provide the legal justification for this illegal action by Atos. My understanding is that you should immediately refer this matter to the Independent Case Examiner. If you fail to do this you are obstructing justice and defying the Law.
You have failed to consider the multiple breaches of the Contract between the DWP and Atos. I have documented these www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatoscontract.html#breaches Why have you not considered these breaches of the Contract in your reply?
I commend you read the report of the Parliamentary Inquiry in Spring 2010. -"It is unacceptable that, despite the Government committing to publishing a report by the Secretary of State (Yvette Cooper) ...on ..decision making standards... annually...the most recent report was published in 2006 and only covered the 2002-2003 period." This conflicts with your claim that "regular audits are undertaken". Was the DWP withholding information to the Parliamentary Inquiry? Can you clarify?
Regarding the assault, I was not aware that I had been assaulted until several months later when I was given a copy of the Contract between the DWP and Atos and information on the individual who assaulted me. The lady claimed to be a doctor qualified in assessing my medical condition. She was not so qualified. Atos doctor Dr Brueker has confirmed she was not so qualified. "Atos" Independent Tier has confirmed she was not so qualified. An FOI request has failed to reveal that she has passed the Atos qualification standards. Thus I was assaulted. It is irrelevant how she carried out the examination and the fact that at that time she convinced me, a lay seriously ill person enduring pain, that she was a doctor who "worked well". She knew I had a brain tumour. She should have known what the Contract states is the procedure to be followed in respect of a patient with a brain tumour. She did not follow the procedure. She made me suffer for 110 minutes. It suggests to me she put Atos and her financial gain above my needs as a patient. She should be struck off the GMC register and the DWP should make this request to the GMC. Can you explain clearly why the DWP has not yet removed "Approval" status from this individual? Can you explain why you have not reported this individual to the Police?
Atos provided unsound medical advice which was a libel. They have admitted this. The Contract is clear Atos should refund the DWP for the mistakes that they make. Refer to the breaches of contract listed in the web link as above. The DWP has not received the goods and services that are specified in the contract and so under contract law the DWP should be refunded. Can you explain why the DWP is allowing Atos to keep monies that they have obtained under false pretences? Can you explain why the DWP has not yet taken Atos to the High Court to sue for libel, to obtain compensation for me and to recover the additional costs the DWP has incurred? Is this an NAO and Police matter? What are the influences that prevents the DWP from protecting taxpayers' funds in this matter? I believe my case is far from being unique. This case may set a precedent.
I notice you have not addressed the very serious matter concerning the individual who decided a face to face assessment was necessary. Note the conflict between what was said to the Secretary of State, what was obtained under a FOI request and what was stated by the "Atos" Independent Tier. Given that the "Atos" Independent Tier was given the task to find out what happened, it is clear Atos lied to the Secretary of State. Can you confirm that you have written to the current Secretary of State to correct matters and inform him of the behaviour of Atos?
I note you have not addressed the use of the term customer in my letter (www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatoslettersgov.html#DWP20100311T). Can you confirm that it is DWP policy to provide clearer more easily understood literature for those whose first language is not English and thus is discriminatory and in breach of equality legislation?
Due to the above can you confirm that the DWP has recommended that Atos Origin be removed from the list of preferred suppliers for future Government contracts?
Finally I have received a cheque from Atos. It says it is paid on behalf of the Benefits Agency. Can you confirm that this money has not been paid from DWP funds but has been paid from Atos funds.
All correspondence is available through my web site (www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatos.html). I look forward to hearing from you.
Thank you.
Medically May was another bad month. At times I stagger around as if I lived in a funfair crazy house. I am used to low level pain all the time. When my right leg goes, I have to use directed mental will to move it and I clump around like Frankensteins' Creature.
My consultant was ill so I have been rescheduled to August. I have not received the results of the last MRI scan. I was upset and now I am not longer too bothered. There must be youngsters with higher priorities.
I am sleeping longer and heavier. I can't get up before 10am and must be in bed by 10pm. I see this as a good thing. I may be wrong but I gather the end game is that, if you are lucky, you fall asleep and cannot be awakened. This may last for a week or two and then the body shuts down. I am happy with this. Currently I am woken at 08:00 to take the medicine.
This is the medicine I am currently taking, though some days I take 5mg of Diazepam in the day if I feel the arm twitching.
08:00 1 x 1000 mg Levetiracetam 08:00 1 x 5 mg Ramipril 08:00 1 x 50 mg Atenolol 08:00 1 x 2 mg Diazepam 14:00 1 x 2 mg Diazepam 20:00 1 x 1500 mg Levetiracetam 20:00 1 x 5 mg Diazepam 20:00 1 x 40 mg Simvasratin
It is the 8 June and have not received any response to my last letters dated 11 May and 27 May. I suspect that they know time is on their side.
Certificate of Pay and Taxable Benefit and Tax Deducted Refunded.
Certificate of Pay and Taxable Benefit and Tax Deducted Refunded - Year to 5 April 2010 Previous employment: ... ... Pay £ 0.00 Tax Deducted £ 0.00 Benefit for Total £ 4286.79 Taxable £ 4286.79 Tax Refunded £ 0.00 current claim Pay and Total for year ... ... .... Taxable £ 4286.79 Net Tax Deducted £ 0.00 benefit PAYE reference ESA500 Final tax code ... NI no ... Date of issue 24/04/10 Benefit Office code ... File Indicator .. Print control ...... P60U Issued by the BA DSS Notes for the claimant Do not destroy For more information see leaflet IR41 which you can get from any tax or benefit office 1. Jobseekers Allowance is subject to tax. 2. This form shows details of benefit and tax paid up to 5 April. It will help you to check your tax assessment or to fill in your tax return if you are sent either of these. Keep your P60U in a safe place as you cannot get another one. 3. If you think the amount of taxable benefit is wrong ask the benefit office for an explanation at once. If you are not satisfied, you have 60 days from the date of this certificate to make an objection, in writing. giving your reasons. If you do not object in writing with in 60 days you cannot question the amount of taxable benefit later. 4. If you have any questions about your tax affairs ask your tax office. If however you have a query about taxable benefit get in touch with your benefit office.
This seems an lot of trouble for such a pitiful sum. How do people without savings, or family or friends survive?
Department for Work and Pensions Commercial Directorate Our address Commercial Management of Medical Services North Fylde Central Office Norcross Block 3 Room 306 Blackpool FY5 3TA Our phone number 01253 611552 Email: DWP.MEDICALSERVICESCORRESPONDENCE@DWP.GSI.GOV.UK Date: 24 June 2010 Our Ref: FOI IR 50-1415 Dear Mr B...Thank you for your email received 28th May 2010 in which you explain you feel the response sent to you 26th May 2010 addressed only in part the matters you raised in your email dated 10th March 2010.
The information you asked for was processed under the Freedom of Information Act and as you have explained that you are dissatisfied with the information supplied, under the terms of the Act I have taken this as a request for an Internal Review.
As Freedom of Information Reviewing Officer I have reviewed in full your request; the decision of the Freedom of Information Officer and the information supplied.
Having looked at this again I am able to confirm that all the information you requested has been supplied to you in full. I therefore uphold the decision of the Freedom of Information Officer, the reasons for which are explained below.
In your letter 10th March you asked for the following information:
Can you provide me the legal justification that supports the refusal of Atos to use the services of the Independent Case Examiner as recommended by the National Audit Office (NAO)?
Can you tell me who is responsible for the management of the Contract between Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) and Atos?
Who audits that the Contract is managed?
Can you explain why no action has been taken over my serious complaint of assault and injury by Atos personnel?
Can you explain why the "Approval" has not yet been removed by the DWP from the individuals complained of?
Can you confirm that Atos has refunded the DWP for the unsound medical advice they provided to the DWP?
Can you tell me when the DWP Decision maker will be able to make a decision based on sound medical advice in line with that outlined by Atos doctor Dr Bruecker?
Can you investigate if Atos, in particular Mr Brian Pepper, has obstructed justice in that Atos provided information to the Minister that the ESA information was reviewed by a qualified HCP prior to deciding a face to face inteNiew was necessary?
Question 1
I note that the response provided in answer to question 1 accurately explained why Atos Healthcare has appropriately not made use of the services of the Independent Case Examiner. To further explain, Atos Healthcare has not ignored the recommendations made by the National Audit Office. These recommendations were directed towards Departmental Agencies, whereas Atos Healthcare is an independent organisation. The recommendations were therefore not made directly to Atos Healthcare.
Jobcentre Plus work with the Independent Case Examiner with regard to complaints handling and also work with Atos Healthcare to ensure that their own internal complaints process mirrors those of the Department. Individual customers may use the services the Independent Case Examiner in appropriate circumstances.
Question 2 and 3
I note that information was supplied in full regarding contract management and audit.
Question 4
You asked why no action has been taken over your serious complaint of assault and injury by Atos personnel. I note that the response stated that Atos Healthcare did not consider that the allegation of assault is valid and that their HCP conducted the assessment in accordance with professional standards, which was also confirmed by the Independent Tier.
In your email 28th May 2010 you explained that you were not aware that you had been assaulted until you received a copy of the Contract. t note in your opinion you feel the HCP was not appropriately qualified which is the basis for your allegation of assault. I also note that full information has previously been supplied to you to confirm that the HCP is fully qualified to the required standards and that in previous correspondence you have stated that you have no complaints about the doctor you saw. It is understood you have also complained to the GMC.
Question 5
You asked for explanation why the approval has not been removed from the individuals comptained of. I note that the response clearly explained that DWP would not be taking action regarding removal of approval unless the findings of the GMC indicate that this is appropriate.
Question 6
At question 6 you asked for confirmation that Atos Healthcare has refunded DWP for the unsound medical advice. The response clearly explained that as the medical assessment report was considered fit for purpose by the DWP decision maker then it is not appropriate for a refund to be requested.
Question 7
At question 7 you asked when the DWP Decision Maker will be able to make a decision. The response appropriately explained that questions about the benefit position or decision making should be directed to your Decision Maker. Neither Atos Healthcare nor Commercial Management of Medical Services Team have a role in the decision making process.
Question 8
At question 8 you asked for an investigation into your complaint about Mr Pepper. I note the answer confirmed that this complaint was being investigated.
The Internal Review of your request for information dated 10th March 2010 is therefore complete.
Your right to complain under the Freedom of Information Act
If you are not happy with this response you may request an internal review by e-mailing freedom-of-information-request@dwp.gsi.gov.uk. or by writing to DWP, Central FoI Team, 2nd Floor The Adelphi, 1-11 John Adam Street, London WC2N 6HT. Any review request should be submitted within two months of the date of this letter.
If you are not content with the outcome of the internal review you may apply directly to the Information Commissioner's Office for a decision. Generally the Commissioner cannot make a decision unless you have exhausted our own complaints procedure. The Information Commissioner can be contacted at: The Information Commissioner's Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow Cheshire SK9 5AF www.ico.gov.uk
As a separate matter to the Internal Review I have conducted, I note in your email 26th May 2010 you ask further questions at points 7,8 & 9. These points did not form part of your request for information 26th May 2010 and are therefore not subject to my Internal Review or your right to complain to Information Commissioner's Office above. Your questions will however be responded to by the Commercial Management of Medical Services Team.
If you have any queries about this letter please contact me quoting the reference number above.
Yours sincerely
John Murphy
Reviewing Officer
Department for Work and Pensions Commercial Directorate Our address Commercial Management of Medical Services North Fylde Central Office Norcross Block 3 Room 306 Blackpool FY5 3TA Our phone number 01253 611552 Email: DWP.MEDICALSERVICESCORRESPONDENCE@DWP.GSI.GOV.UK Date: 24 June 2010 Our Ref: 2623 Dear Mr B...Thank you for your email received 28th May 2010, part of which has been responded to under the terms of the Freedom of Information Act. The remainder of your questions, as promised are answered below.
Your letter to Ms Letwin at DWP Legal Group has also been forwarded to this team to respond to.
In your email 28th May 2010 at point 7 you asked.
I note you have not addressed the use of the term customer in my letter (www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatoslettersgov.html#DWP20100311T). Can you confirm that it is DWP policy to provide clearer more easily understood literature for those whose first language is not English and thus is discriminatory and in breach of equality legislation?
I understand you have received a response regarding the use of the term customer in the letter sent to you on the 9th February 2010. With regard to your second point about equality, the following link provides full information about DWP Policy on Diversity and Equality. http://www.dwp.gov.uk/about-dwp/diversity-and-equality
With regard to the complaint you made in connection with Atos Healthcare, in your email at point 8 you also asked if it could be confirmed that the DWP has recommended that Atos Origin be removed from the list of preferred suppliers for future Government contracts.
I can confirm that whilst Atos Healthcare are currently contracted to supply medical services to DWP, they are not regarded. nor listed as a preferred supplier because under the European Directive, contracts over a certain monetary threshold are subject to open competitive tender.
Regarding point 9 of your email 28th May 2010, I can confirmation that the cheque you have received from Atos Healthcare has been paid by Atos Healthcare funds and not by DWP.
With regard to your letter dated 10th March 2010, you asked Ms Letwin to review your letters sent to Mr Hampshire at the Independent Tier, Ms RB... at Luton BDC. Ms C... at Atos Healthcare and your letter to the GMC. As the information you asked for is in connection with the Medical Services contract, this letter has been forwarded to this team for our response.
In this letter you asked for the legal justification for Atos Healthcare's refusal to use the services of the Independent Case Examiner. In a subsequent response from this team we explained that Atos Healthcare has appropriately not made use of the services of the Independent Case Examiner because this recommendation, made by the National Audit 0ffice was directed towards Departmental Agencies rather than to Atos Healthcare which is an independent organisation. Our response added that Jobcentre Plus work with the Independent Case Examiner with regard to complaints handling and also work with Atos Healthcare to ensure that their own internal complaints process mirrors those of the Department. Individual customers may use the services the Independent Case Examiner in appropriate circumstances.
In your letter 10th March 2010 to Ms Letwin you also stated that the "Independent Tier" did not consider multiple breaches of the Contract between DWP and Atos."
As the Independent Tier (IT) is a body independent from DWP and Atos Healthcare any dissatisfaction should be addressed directly to the IT.
Your question regarding the management and audit of the Contract has been answered in our letter dated 26th May 2010. The Medical Services Contract Management Team, recently renamed as Commercial Management of Medical Services, manage the Medical Services contract.
Your question about refunding DWP for the medical advice has also been answered in the letter dated 26th May 2010. As the medical assessment report was considered fit for purpose by the DWP decision maker then it is not appropriate for a refund to be requested.
You asked 'when the Decision Maker will make a decision based on sound medical advice: As answered also in the letter dated 26th May 2010, questions regarding the decision making process should be directed your Decision Maker.
Finally you asked if "Atos Healthcare and Mr Pepper have obstructed justice in that information was provided to the Minister that the ESA information was reviewed by a qualified HCP prior to deciding a face to face interview necessary. The Independent Tier states this is not the case:
I can confirm that the information sent by DWP to ... MP 28th October 2009 is correct when stating that information provided by customers is screened before deciding whether a face to face examination is required.
Michelle Munro
Official Correspondence Manager
Commercial Management of Medical Services
Medically June was another bad month. Very very very very tired. More fits (no pun intended real fits not fit for work) even with Diazepram. My consultant moved my appointment earlier. The brain tumour has grown and spread. I am immediately referred to the brain surgery team who will review. I should see them within weeks.
So if this all I can do, I hope this has been helpful. I leave to others to protect the most vulnerable in society.
I have attempted to refer the matter to the Independent Case Examiner but was my request has so far been rejected. See my correspondence dwpatoslettersgov.html#ICE.
Due to ill health I may not be able to refer the matter to the the Parliamentary Ombudsman, the NAO, the Police and the Ministry of Justice.
On 15 July I had a couple of phone calls to my answer phone from the DWP (Anita Guy, Luton Benefit Delivery Centre) asking to speak to me. I ignored them. The next day she phoned again. I answered and said that I was too weak to talk. I insisted they write and believe I requested her to sort out my entitlement to DLA. I believe I asked her to complete the DLA form as I can no longer write legibly, send it to me and I will check and amend if necessary. By the end of July she has still not bothered to write to me.
This letter is written on behalf of the Chief Executive.
Jobcentre Plus Room 6.37. Caxton House. Tothill Street, London SW1H 9NA Telephone 020 7829 3364 Darra Singh Chief Executive darra.singh@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk www.direct.gov.uk Our ref: CE 0117034 29 July 2010 Dear Mr B...The Independent Case Examiner (ICE) has asked Darra Singh, Chief Executive of Jobcentre Plus, to reply to your email of 5 July concerning your complaints about Employment and Support Allowance and the Work Capability Assessment. The ICE asked Mr Singh to reply because he has not previously had the opportunity to look into your complaint. I am replying on behalf of Mr Singh as one of the Directors of Jobcentre Plus.
I am very sorry for the delay you have experienced in resolving your complaint about our decision that you should undertake work-related activity whilst claiming Employment and Support Allowance. I am also sorry that we have not previously replied to your letter of 11 May. I have included the information you requested in this reply.
You wrote to us on 11 August 2009 to say that you disagreed with our decision but wished to defer your appeal until Atos Healthcare had replied to your complaints and sent you a copy of the medical report. We should have looked again at our decision at that stage so that you had the chance to move to an appeal as quickly as possible thereafter. Anita Guy, from our Luton Benefit Delivery Centre, telephoned you on 16 July to apologise for this and to explain what we would do next. I understand that you were unable to speak for long with Anita so she agreed to include more information in this letter.
As Anita explained, we have looked again at our decision but we are unable to change it. We will now send your appeal to the Tribunals Service so they can arrange far a hearing by an Independent Tribunal. We will also send you a copy of your appeal case.
Regardless of the outcome of your appeal, it is clear that we have caused you an unacceptable delay in this matter. We are therefore considering making you a Special Payment for the delay and we will write to you separately about this.
In your letter of 11 May, you asked for information about the rates of Employment and Support Allowance components. The weekly rate for the Work Related Activity Group component was £25.50 until 11 April 2010 then increased to £25.95. The weekly rate for the Support Group component was £30.85 and also increased to £31.40 after 11 April 2010. It is for the Tribunal to decide whether we have applied the law correctly in making our decision and it would be inappropriate to estimate how this difference might hypothetically be applied in your case.
When you spoke to Anita you asked her to provide a copy of the IB59 memo Atos Healthcare sent us about your most recent Work Capability Assessment. I enclose a copy of the IB59 with this letter.
In your email to the ICE you have raised several related issues about how Atos Healthcare assessed your capability. You have complained to Atos Healthcare separately about these matters and they were investigated through their own complaints procedure up to the Independent Tier. Geoff Hampshire, Convenor to the Independent Tier wrote to you on 15 February to explain that the investigation by Independent Tier had fully supported Atos Healthcare in their conduct and their handling of your complaints. I am unable to add anything further to his letter.
In your email you also state that you have not had a reply to your letter of 10 March to Isabel Letwin, Director of DWP Legal Services. Although Isabel acknowledges that there was a delay in replying to you and has asked me to pass on her apologies for this, James Fay wrote to you on Isabel's behalf on 26 May. On 27 May, you requested a review of the information he sent you and John Murphy wrote to you with the outcome on 24 June. I enclose copies of both of these letters for your information. I believe that these letters address the remaining questions that you included in your email of 5 July to the ICE and there is nothing I can usefully add to them.
As you are aware, you can contact the Independent Case Examiner (ICE) with six months from the date of this letter if you are not satisfied with the action taken by Jobcentre Plus. ICE offers a free, impartial resolution service but does not consider matters of law or government policy. ICE can be contacted by telephone (0845 606 0777), in writing (PO Box 155. Chester CH99 9SA), or by e-mail(ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk). Full details are available on the ICE website at www.ind-case-exam.org.uk
Yours sincerely
DOUG WATKINS
HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR ON BEHALF OF THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE
Attached was the following IB59, whose standard of English leaves a lot to be desired, and copies of letters that the DWP had previously sent dated 26 May 2010 and 24 June 2010.
Medical Services advice minute Customer details Title Mr Surname B... Other names M. National Insurance number ... Date of birth ... Advice to be noted below Dear DM After farther communication with Dr ... (GP of Mr B...) he let me know that this gentleman suffers from Glioma (brain toumor), which hasn't yet reached the criteria for Terminal Illness, but it causes fits that may cause substantial risk and he has been referred to see the top specialist in the county. Bearing in mind the recent deterioration and the treatment for the fits, I believe that it is likely this gentleman to fulfill the LCW/LCWRA criteria for special circumstances (substantial risk if found capable for work or work related activities). I hope you find this helpful (handwritten) A prognosis of 12 months seems to be reasonable. IM 30/4/2010 Name Dr Ilias Macheridis Date 23/04/2010 Approved Disability Analyst IB59 MIN Version 10/06
Very ill. Weaker every day. Twelve week wait to see brain surgery team. It seems a long way away but there are youngsters and others with more desperate need.
This letter was attached to an email sent to darra.singh@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk and copied to doug.watkins@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk
Mr Darra Singh Chief Executive, Jobcentre Plus Room 6.37, Caxton House, Tothill Street, London SW1H 9NA darra.singh@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk4 August 2010
Dear Mr Darra Singh
NI Ref: ... Your ref: CE 0117034
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Regarding the letter dated 29 July 2010 and attachments I received from Mr Doug Watkins Human Resources Director on behalf of the Chief Executive.
Thank you for the copy of the IB59 dated 23/04/2010 produced by Dr Ilias Macheridis of Atos Healthcare. Unfortunately it is not written in English; specifically to the standard of English specified in the Contract between the DWP and Atos Origin. There are spelling errors; the use of "farther" when "further" should have been used. Please can you explain what exactly is the medical condition "toumor". Finally the sentence starting "Bearing in mind..." does not make sense. The quality of work is unprofessional. I do not believe a qualified doctor would produce such shoddy work full of gross errors.
I have copies of the letters sent by my GP and my consultant to the DWP Atos and it appears that Dr Ilias Macheridis has poor skills in both reading and writing English. I would be pleased to provide the originals to assist if required.
1. Further the DWP Decision Maker who processed the IB59 should NOT have accepted this poor quality from Atos Healthcare. The Decision Maker should have returned this form as unacceptable and taken steps against Dr Ilias Macheridis including reporting him to the Medical Services Contract Management Team and the GMC. It should not be the responsibility of a patient to report a DWP contractor to the GMC. The DWP has a duty of care to the patient. I expect the DWP to exercise this duty in full. Can you explain what steps you are taking against this individual?
2. Please can you provide me the GMC reference for Dr Ilias Macheridis.
3. Please can you arrange for Dr Ilias Macheridis to be removed from the "approved" list on the grounds that his knowledge of English is not up to standard.
4. Please can you take action against Atos Origin for breach of contract.
5. Please can you ask Atos Healthcare to redo the IB59 by someone qualified and who can both read and write English to the standard specified in the Contract. Once this has been completed please send me a copy and I will decide whether there are grounds for appeal.
6. Please can you note I am STILL expecting a letter from Ms Anita Guy who promised to write to me in the telephone conversation you referred to. As I am unable to write I believed she was going to complete a DLA form on my behalf and send it to me for my approval. I expect outstanding matters to be addressed, to receive an apology and to explain what disciplinary or competency action has been taken against the individuals who have harmed me.
7. Please can you note I am STILL expecting a letter from the Medical Services Contract Management Team over the action they are taking over the multiple breaches of contract, the fact that the Minister was misled in respect of who decides whether a face to face assessment is necessary, the fact they have lost records of who took the decision, the fact that the 90 minutes journey time was ignored, other breaches listed previously, the fact that the doctor should NOT have carried out the assessment as she was not a specialist in my medical condition and the fact that the doctor could neither read nor write English to the level specified in the Contract (the evidence is the unsound ESA85 she produced). Mr James Fay confirmed investigations continue over the misleading of the Minister by Mr Brian Pepper. I expect to receive a full account, an apology and to explain what disciplinary or competency action has been taken against the individuals who have harmed me. Why did the Cardiff Atos office make an illegal appointment in breach of contract?
8. I am pleased that the IB59, as I have attempted to translate it, confirms that a face to face assessment was not necessary, it confirms that the ESA85 dated 24th July 2009 was unsound and a libel. As explained above the IB59 is unsound. This is the third attempt by Atos Healthcare to comply with the Contract and they have failed each time. Can you confirm they have refunded the taxpayer for their repeated mistakes?
9. Given the above evidence can you confirm the "approval" of the doctor who produced the unsound ESA85 has been removed?
10. I note you have not addressed my point that the DWP claim that regular audits are undertaken is not consistent with the DWP written evidence submitted to the Parliamentary Inquiry that the most recent report, was published in 2006 and only covered the 2002-2003 period. I ask again can you clarify?
11. It is clear that Atos Origin misled the Secretary of State over the matter of who decides whether a face to face interview is necessary. Can you confirm that you have written to the current Secretary of State to correct matters, inform him of the behaviour of Atos Origin and can you recommend that Atos Origin be removed from the list of preferred suppliers for future Government contracts?
12. I note you have not addressed the use of the term customer in my letter (www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatoslettersgov.html#DWP20100311T). Can you confirm that it is DWP policy to provide clearer, more easily understood, literature for those whose first language is not English and thus is discriminatory and in breach of equality legislation or explain what steps you are taking to ensure documentation is legal?
13. I would like to point out that there are many legal precedents where a Department of State is fully responsible for the actions of any contractors it chooses to engage. Thus the NAO procedure should have been followed and the process carried out by Mr Geoff Hampshire is not legal. Can you explain why you continue to obstruct justice, defy the Law and refuse to refer this matter to the Independent Case Examiner in conformance to the NAO policy clearly set out?
14. I accept your offer of a Special Payment to cover delay and consequential costs. This is over and above the monies legally due and withheld through the neglect or incompetence of the DWP. I suggest a nominal sum for each item of correspondence similar to that which would be charged by a firm of solicitors. Can you confirm that this is acceptable and I can send you a full account when this matter is resolved to the satisfaction of all parties?
If you can address these 14 points as soon as possible as this matter has been outstanding over a year. All correspondence is available through my web site (www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatos.html). I look forward to hearing from you.
Thank you.
Yours faithfully
I emailed the Independent Case Examiner a copy of this letter. The ICE replied asking whether action was required by email dated 6 August 2010 and I responded requesting a postponement giving the DWP the chance to reply dated 6 August 2010. If they have not heard from me due to my ill health or from my executor by the 1 October 2010 they should take action.
Jobcentreplus NlNo: ... SP ref no: BDC/BFD10/01/110510 Date: 06/08/2010 Dear Mr B...About this Special Payment request
This is to let you know the outcome of a request for a special payment that the Jobcentreplus has asked me to consider on your behalf.
On behalf of Jobcentreplus I would like to apologise for the mistakes, which led to this request.
A payment for gross inconvenience resulting from persistent error will only be made if the errors made are so persistent and over such a protracted period of time that it causes the customer gross inconvenience in the pursuit of benefits, or pursuing a justified complaint about relevant matters.
Consolatory payments are made in very exceptional circumstances where an official error has had a direct adverse effect on the life of the customer and/or on the life of another person.
In the exceptional circumstances of your case I have decided to award you a Special Payment of £75.
It should be remembered that some dealings with the Department, whether or not an error occurs, may take time and that complying with the law can often be frustrating or inconvenient and sometimes stressful.
There is no process of appeal against our Special Payment decision because these decisions are entirely discretionary. However, if you can provide further evidence to support your request we will review our decision.
Where to get more information
If you have not received this payment within a month from the date of this letter, please contact me by telephone on 01582 681347 or by post at Jobcentre Plus, Luton BDC, Ascot Road, Watford WD99 1AB.
Yours sincerely
Bonita Murphy
Employment and Support Allowance Manager, Luton BDC
How this compensatory payment may affect your entitlement to income based benefits.
If you are unsure on any of the following information you should contact the office that is/would be responsible for processing your benefit claim.
If you receive a contribution based benefit
This payment will not affect any contribution-based benefit you are receiving or will receive in the future.
If you receive an income based benefit
This payment may affect any income-based benefit such as Income Support, Income Based Jobseeker's Allowance, Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit you receive or will receive in the future.
The amount of the payment you have received will be disregarded for a period of time dependent on the amount of the award if it is in respect of Attendance Allowance, Disability Living Allowance, Income Support, Mobility Allowance or Supplement, Supplementary Benefit, Jobseeker's Allowance (Income Based Jobseeker's Allowance only) or Income Based Jobseeker's Allowance (Income Support, Housing Benefit and Council Tax Benefit).
If the payment is in respect of any other benefit check with your local office as it maybe taken into account immediately.
Period of disregard - amount of arrears and compensatory payment is less than £5,000
If the amount of arrears and compensatory payment you have received is to be disregarded and is less than £5,OOO, this payment will not be taken into account for a period of 52 weeks from when you receive it.
Period of disregard - amount of arrears and compensatoy payment is £5,000 or more
If the amount of arrears and compensatory payment you have received is to be disregarded and is £5,000 or more, this payment will not be taken into account for 52 weeks from when you receive it or, if the payment was received in full during your current claim for an income based benefit, the remaining period of your current claim, whichever is the longer period.
Capital after the disregarded period
After the disregard period any money remaining will be added to any other savings (capital) you or your partner have and taken into account in the normal way. The amount of capital a customer or their partner has before it affects entitlement to income-based benefits depends on the benefit claimed. Capital is not just savings in a build ing society, capital can be:
savings from income, i.e. cash, money held in bank/building society accounts:
a lump-sum or one off payment, e.g. money which has been borrowed, compensation for personal injury;
investments, i.e. capital and income bonds, stocks and shares, personal pension schemes;
property, i.e. land, outbuildings, business assets;
a beneficial interest in the capital of a trust; and/or unadministered estate.
This is not an exhaustive list.
Capital rules
Capital or what is sometimes known as savings can have an effect on a claim to income based benefit. There are two limits that apply, a lower and upper limit. Capital over the upper limit will usually mean you cannot get income-based benefits. The level of the limits varies dependent on the benefit claimed and your circumstances. For more information see leaflet Social Security benefit rates, reference GL23, savings rules or ask at your nearest Jobcentre or Benefit Delivey Centre.
Please note, should you make a claim to Pension Credit the lower limit is capital up to and includ ing £6,000 (£10,000 in specified accommodation) and will not be taken into account. However, should you require any more detailed information on how this payment may affect Pension Credit please contact the Pension Service.
Tariff income
For each £250 or part of £250 of capital over the lower limit your benefit is reduced by £1 per week. for more information see leaflet Social Security benefit rates, reference GL23, income from capital or ask at your nearest Jobcentre or Benefit Delivery Centre.
This is not a full and authoritative statement of law. If you are unsure how capital affects specific benefits, or what is classed as capital , please contact the office dealing with your claim.
Department for Work and Pensions Page 1 HELPDESK PO Box 4194, Cardiff, CF14 8BB. Phone 0845 602 8244 Remittance Advice Date 16/08/2010A payment of £75 will be paid via Automatic Credit Transfer direct to your Bank / Building Society. Please make allowance for the time Bank / Building Society will require to pass the payment through their clearing system prior to crediting your account. The payment has been made in respect of the following item(s).
Your reference is ... Please tell me this number if you get in touch. YOUR PAYEE REFERENCE NUMBER IS ... Invoice Number Date Amount Paid Amount Recovered Invoice Description ... 04/08/2010 - 04/08/2010 04/08/2010 75.00 Page 1 of 1 (End of remittance Advice)
Letter from the DWP acknowledging 4 August 2010 letter. Clearly as a result of the letter emailed to my MP.
Department for Work and Pensions Commercial Directorate Our address Commercial Management of Medical Services. Room 306, Norcross Governnment Buildings, Norcross Lane, Thornton, Lancashire FY5 3TA Our phone number 01253 611553 Website www.dwp.gov.uk Our Ref 2848 Date: 24 August 2010Dear Mr B...
I am writing to acknowledge that your letter dated 4 August 2010 to Darra Singh has been received and a response is being drafted by Jobcentre Plus and DWP Commercial Management of Medical Services team to the questions you asked within your letter.
1. Further the DWP Decision Maker who processed the IB59 should NOT have accepted this poor quality from Atos Healthcare. The Decision Maker should have returned this form as unacceptable and taken steps against Dr Ilias Macheridis including reporting him to the Medical Services Contract Management Team and the GMC. It should not be the responsibility of a patient to report a DWP contractor to the GMC. The DWP has a duty of care to the patient. I expect the DWP to exercise this duty in full. Can you explain what steps you are taking against this individual?
2. Please can you provide me the GMC reference for Dr Ilias Macheridis.
3. Please can you arrange for Dr Ilias Macheridis to be removed from the "approved" list on the grounds that his knowledge of English is not up to standard.
4. Please can you take action against Atos Origin for breach of contract.
5. Please can you ask Atos Healthcare to redo the IB59 by someone qualified and who can both read and write English to the standard specified in the Contract. Once this has been completed please send me a copy and I will decide whether there are grounds for appeal.
6. Please can you note I am STILL expecting a letter from Ms Anita Guy who promised to write to me in the telephone conversation you referred to. As I am unable to write I believed she was going to complete a DLA form on my behalf and send it to me for my approval. I expect outstanding matters to be addressed, to receive an apology and to explain what disciplinary or competency action has been taken against the individuals who have harmed me.
7. Please can you note I am STILL expecting a letter from the Medical Services Contract Management Team over the action they are taking over the multiple breaches of contract, the fact that the Minister was misled in respect of who decides whether a face to face assessment is necessary, the fact they have lost records of who took the decision, the fact that the 90 minutes journey time was ignored, other breaches listed previously, the fact that the doctor should NOT have carried out the assessment as she was not a specialist in my medical condition and the fact that the doctor could neither read nor write English to the level specified in the Contract (the evidence is the unsound ESA85 she produced). Mr James Fay confirmed investigations continue over the misleading of the Minister by Mr Brian Pepper. I expect to receive a full account, an apology and to explain what disciplinary or competency action has been taken against the individuals who have harmed me. Why did the Cardiff Atos office make an illegal appointment in breach of contract?
8. I am pleased that the IB59, as I have attempted to translate it, confirms that a face to face assessment was not necessary, it confirms that the ESA85 dated 24th July 2009 was unsound and a libel. As explained above the IB59 is unsound. This is the third attempt by Atos Healthcare to comply with the Contract and they have failed each time. Can you confirm they have refunded the taxpayer for their repeated mistakes?
9. Given the above evidence can you confirm the "approval" of the doctor who produced the unsound ESA85 has been removed?
10. I note you have not addressed my point that the DWP claim that regular audits are undertaken is not consistent with the DWP written evidence submitted to the Parliamentary Inquiry that the most recent report, was published in 2006 and only covered the 2002-2003 period. I ask again can you clarify?
11. It is clear that Atos Origin misled the Secretary of State over the matter of who decides whether a face to face interview is necessary. Can you confirm that you have written to the current Secretary of State to correct matters, inform him of the behaviour of Atos Origin and can you recommend that Atos Origin be removed from the list of preferred suppliers for future Government contracts?
12. I note you have not addressed the use of the term customer in my letter (www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatoslettersgov.html#DWP20100311T). Can you confirm that it is DWP policy to provide clearer, more easily understood, literature for those whose first language is not English and thus is discriminatory and in breach of equality legislation or explain what steps you are taking to ensure documentation is legal?
13. I would like to point out that there are many legal precedents where a Department of State is fully responsible for the actions of any contractors it chooses to engage. Thus the NAO procedure should have been followed and the process carried out by Mr Geoff Hampshire is not legal. Can you explain why you continue to obstruct justice, defy the Law and refuse to refer this matter to the Independent Case Examiner in conformance to the NAO policy clearly set out?
14. I accept your offer of a Special Payment to cover delay and consequential costs. This is over and above the monies legally due and withheld through the neglect or incompetence of the DWP. I suggest a nominal sum for each item of correspondence similar to that which would be charged by a firm of solicitors. Can you confirm that this is acceptable and I can send you a full account when this matter is resolved to the satisfaction of all parties?
Please accept my apologies for the delay in acknowledging your letter.
Yours sincerely
Hilary Brierley
Deputy Head of Commercial Management of Medical Services
Medically August was a very bad month getting worse. Still awaiting appointment with brain surgery team.
The letter was dated 26 August.
Department For Work and Pensions Commercial Directorate Our address Commercial Management of Medical Services North Fylde Central Office Norcross Block 3 Room 306 Blackpool FY5 3TA Our phone number 01253 611537 Email: DWP.MEDICALSERVICESCORRESPONDENCE@DWP.GSI.GOV.UK Date: 26 August 2010 Our Ref FOI 1573-2219 Dear Mr B... Thank you for your Freedom of Information request dated 4 August that was included within your letter to Darra Singh and forwarded for me to respond to in my role as Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) Commercial Management of Medical Services Freedom of Information Officer. You asked to be provided with the GMC reference for Dr Ilias Macheridis. As you state the approved Health Care Professional (HCP) who completed the IB59 was Dr Ilias Macheridis, his GMC reference number is 6138922 HCP primary qualifications are held in the public domain and appear on the General Medical Council (GMC)'s website. Please refer to www.gmc-uk.org then click on "check a doctor's registration" and complete the appropriate fields. HCP's are also fully trained in Disability Assessment Medicine. Expertise in this field qualifies the HCP to give an impartial, independent assessment on the way in which a customer's illness or disability affects them in carrying out of a range of eveyday work- retated activities. Training (see Appendix) includes the assessment of the effects of specific conditions, for example mental health, or where a condition may ftuctuate. Emphasis is always placed on the differing circumstances of each individual customer. All HCP's have passed strict recruitment and experience criteria and are registered with an appropriate professional body such as the GMC or the Nursing and Midwifey Councit. They also receive training in customer rights, equal opportunities and professional standards. The role of the HCP is to cary out an assessment of the functional effects of the customer's disabling condition, and to utilise the information gathered to provide the DWP Decision Maker with an impartial and independent assessment. Therefore, unlike the more widely known type of examination, the assessment is not concerned with diagnosis or decisions about treatment so specialist diagnostic qualifications are unnecessary. However a customer may submit evidence from their doctor or specialist if appropriate. The assessment carried out is different to the more usual type of medical examination in which the HCPs aim is to make a diagnosis and decide on appropriate treatment. A GP or Specialist is not usually trained in disability assessment medicine and therefore will often not have specific experience in assessing the disabling effects of medical conditions and the way in which a customer's illness or disability affects them in carrying out of a range of eveyday work-related activities. As well as this difference in emphasis within the assessment process, the HCP will, when giving an opinion, be aware of the law relating to benefit entitlement. A Specialist on the other hand is less likely to be familiar with Social Security Legislation. Unfortunately we cannot supply any information relating to professional standing or qualifications. CV's and information relating to post-graduate qualifications of an HCP, which are held by Atos Healthcare, constitutes that person's personal data. This information cannot be disclosed in accordance with Section 40 of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 as disclosure would breach that person's right to privacy under the Data Protection Act 1998. In applying this exemption the Department has balanced the public interest in withholding the information against the public interest in disclosing the information and consider there is no overarching public interest argument in favour of releasing this information The other matters you have raised in your correspondence will be answered separately. If you have any queries about this letter please contact me quoting the reference number above. Yours sincerely James Fay Freedom of Information Officer Your right to complain under the Freedom of Information Act If you are not happy with this response you may request an internal review by e-mailing freedom-of-information-request@dwp.gsi.gov.uk, or by writing to DWP, Central FoI Team, 5th Floor The Adelphi, 1-11, John Adam Street, London WC2N 6HT. Any review request should be submitted within two months of the date of this letter. If you are not content with the outcome of the internal review you may apply directly to the Information Commissioner's Office for a decision. Generally the Commissioner cannot make a decision unless you have exhausted our own complaints procedure. The Information Commissioner can be contacted at: The Information Commissioner's Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane. Wilmslow Cheshire SK9 5AF www.ico.gov.uk ======================= Appendix Atos Healthcare Training Initial Training: varies in detail according to which benefit is involved. However all such training follows a similar basic pattern, as follows: Theoretical Training: Theoretical training commences with a trainer led theory based course usually delivered to a group of HCPs in a classroom setting. HCPs who are new to the work of Atos Healthcare will receive instruction in such areas as disability analysis, customers rights, equal opportunities and professional standards. Detailed technical information relevant to the benefit concerned is provided. All Atos Healthcare trainers have undergone specific training to prepare them for the role, including practical sessions to enhance their understanding of how adults leam. Practical Training: Practical Training is the work undertaken by the new recruits that is produced in a controlled environment. For examination centre based assessments the HCP is supervised and appraised by an experienced Medical Adviser as they complete their introductory cases. In the domiciliary visit based benefits the initial cases are monitored immediately on return to allow feedback to be given without delay. Demonstration of understanding assessed by multiple choice examination: for Incapacity Benefit, Employment and Support Allowance and Disability Living Allowance the HCP is required to attain a pass mark in a multiple chaice questionnaire before they are allowed to proceed to the practical training. The questionnaire includes questions on the whole range of topics covered in the training course. Demonstration of understanding by audit: In all benefits the initial cases produced by the HCP are target monitored by an experienced medical adviser and the training cannot be considered as complete until they have demonstrated that their work is acceptable. Whenever any problems are identified appropriate feedback is provided. Further cases are monitored until the work is shown to be satisfactory. If the situation is not rectified the HCP may be required to repeat the entire training process. Continued lack of progress will result in the HCP being informed by a medical manager they can be offered no further training and no further work. Approval: All HCPs must be approved by the CMA to the DWP and separate approval is required for each benefit area in which the HCP is involved. Approval is dependent on successful completion of all stages of their training process and ongoing demonstration that the work being carried out meets a satisfactory standard. Written Guidelines: As part of the HCPs training and ongoing support they are issued with guidelines pertaining to the benefit involved. These guidance notes provide specific technical advice about the benefit concerned, outline best practise and contain general advice about disability analysis and service to the people with disabilities. All HCPs are monitored to ensure that their work meets the required quality standards. If a problem is identified, the HCP may be required to undertake tailored training, which may involve training in mental health issues if required.
The letter revisits DWP use of customer.
Department For Work and Pensions Commercial Directorate Our address Commercial Management of Medical Services Room 306, Norcross Government Buildings, Norcross Lane, Thornton. Lancashire FY5 3TA Our phone number 01253 611553 Website www.dwp.gov.uk Our Ref 2903 Date: 3 September 2010 Dear Mr B... Your letters dated 11 March and 15 June 2010 sent to Isabel Letwin raised a number of points about the Department for Work and Pensions policies in relation to the use of terminology for "customers"/"claimants"; and the use of plain English: 1. The Parliamentary Inquiry has reported. Evidence and the report uses the term "Claimant" and "Customer". 2. Is it Government policy and DWP policy to provide clearer more easily understood literature for those whose first language is not English? I am responding in my role as manager of the DWP Commercial Management of Medical Services team. This team is responsible for managing the performance of Atos Healthcare, who provide Medical Services on behalf of the Department to support Decision Making on sickness and disability related benefits. I apologise for the delay in response to your queries. I understand that Q1 was answered under the Freedom of Information Act in the letter dated 9 February 2010, Ref FOI 1209-2565 (a copy is enclosed). In relation to Q2 and your points about the use of English as a first language, the Department has clear policies and guidance for dealing with all of its customers, including those who require different formats, for example disability and language access. The Department's policy with regards to providing documents for those customers whose first language is not English was established to meet legislative requirements. The legal obligations arise in the main from the Race Relations Act 1976 (and related legislation). Under the Race Equality Duty, all public bodies (which include DWP) have a specific duty to publish a race equality scheme that, amongst other things, sets out the arrangements to make sure the public have access to information and services. The DWP Race, Disability and Gender Equality Scheme sets out the arrangements and can be accessed at: http://www.dwp.gov.uk/about-dwp/diversity-and-equality/dwp-equality-schemes/ /equality-schemes-2008-2011/ The Department's policy ensures that written information is accessible to all customers by producing its main information products in different formats and languages, as appropriate, as well as English. When delivering services the Department must provide reasonable adjustments for customers and it aims to meet the commitment by ensuring that the alternative formats are available at the time they are requested, or within a reasonable pre-specified period of time agreed with the customer. As part of its standards in delivering all of these services the Department has a commitment to the use of plain English. For non written communication the Department has guidance in place for the support of customers. This means, for example, that where a member of staff needs to inteview a customer who does not speak English, the Department's practice is that they should arrange to provide an interpreter within one working day (although the interview may need to take place later than this). Staff should, in accordance with this practice, offer customers an interpreter arranged and paid for by the Department. I trust this is helpful. Yours sincerely Hilary Brierley Commercial Management of Medical Services
The letter from the Jobcentre Plus claims to review the whole matter and find nothing amiss.
Employment and Support Allowance - Jobcentre Plus Luton BDC, Ascot Road, Watford. WD99 1AB Telephone 0845 608 8627 Website: www.jobcentreplus.gov.uk Date: 06/09/2010 Our ref: NI nos ... Dear Mr B..., I have looked again at the decision about Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) notified to you on 29/07/2009. following the telephone conversation I had with you in July 2010, I referred your case back to the Medical Services and requested a reconsideration of the original medical opinion which at that time showed that you had met the ESA Work Related Activity Group criteria rather than the Support Group criteria. The medical advice which has been received has fully taken into account all the points you raised in your letters received in August 2009 and has not been changed on reconsideration. The Medical Adviser has stated that the information available at the time of the assessment which you attended on 24/07/2009 did not show that you met the Support Group criteria and this medical opinion was later supported by the investigation carried out by the Independent Tier. I have taken into account the original report, your letters and the Medical Practitioner's reconsideration response and I agree with the reasons for placing you in the ESA Work Related Activity Group. Consequently, I have not revised the decision dated 29/07/2009 and as a result you remain in that group for the period 11/07/2009 to 28/04/2010 (both dates included). On 05/05/2010 you were however placed in the Support Group from 29/04/2010 after your case was reviewed by the Medical Services. This decision was made by the Decision Maker and was based on the medical opinion of your GP Doctor C..., who had advised the Medical Services that there had been recent deterioration in you medical condition. If you now wish to appeal against the original outcome decision dated 29/07/2009 the late application will be supported and accepted as in time far the Appeal Tribunal purpose. I must apologise that the letters you submitted in August 2009 did not receive the correct response from this Office. The explanation which has been sent to you in response to your Chief Executive complaint should have provided a full explanation for this. If you require any further information or assistance, I will be pleased to help and I may be contacted by post at the address at the top of this letter or by telephone on 01582 681347. Mrs A Guy, ESA WCA Team Leader, Luton BDC Part of the Department for Work and Pensions
This email is the response to the letter of the 1 September above.
To Mr James Fay, Freedom of Information Officer Your Ref FOI 1573-2219 Dear Mr James Fay, Thank you for your letter dated 26 August 2010. I appreciate you supplying me with the GMC reference for Dr M..., who unfortunately can neither read nor write English to the standard specified in the Contract between the DWP and Atos. I am concerned that you have provided a partial view of the process the HCP is obliged to carry out as defined by Contract. I would like you to read the Contract. I have given you another opportunity to provide me with a corrected statement of the process to include the following: 1. The HCP should read and write English to the standard specified. 2. The HCP should read the ESA50 and decide whether the claimant has a listed medical condition. These are defined in Appendix 1 of Schedule 4 Section 4.12 Final Version - 15 March 2005 - Pages 6 to 11 a) Some listed conditions do not require a face to face assessment. b) Other listed conditions require that the HCP first contact the GP or Consultant of the claimant to agree that a face to face assessment will not harm the patient or is unnecessary. If the face to face assessment is unnecessary, the IB59 is completed to reflect the information provided by GP or Consultant. c) Other listed conditions where a face to face assessment is required may assess the functional effects of the claimant's disabling condition and may follow the process as you describe. The HCP should produce an ESA85 in English for the Decision Maker. Finally I refer you to the Contract where the Atos HCP is contractually obliged to ONLY use the term "claimant" in respect of the claimant. HCPs assess War pensioners, patients, the disabled and others where the term "customer" is inappropriate, confusing and insulting. Can you confirm that the Contract does NOT allow Atos is use the term "customer" or "client" but only claimant? Can you further confirm that any usage of the term "customer" or "client" by Atos in respect of the claimant is a breach of Contract? Here are the Contract Schedule 1 Definitions (Final Version dated 15 March 2005 pages 3 - 25): "Claimant(s)" means any person claiming or having claimed entitlement to the receipt of benefits or Other Related Advantages from the AUTHORITY or from any other department, office or agency of the Crown. "Customer" means a representative of the AUTHORITY for whom the provision of Services is included in the scope of this Agreement. I look forward to hearing from you. I am happy to communicate by email. Yours sincerely
This letter is suppossed to address the 14 points.
Department for Work and Pensions Commercial Directorate Our address Commercial Management of Medical Services. Room 306, Norcross Governnment Buildings, Norcross Lane, Thornton, Lancashire FY5 3TA Our phone number 01253 611553 Website www.dwp.gov.uk Our Ref 2848/2895/CE117034 Date: 3 September 2010Dear Mr B...
Thank you for your letter of 4 August and your email of 18 August to Darra Singh, Chief Executive of Jobcentre Plus, concerning your issues with Atos Healthcare and Jobcentre Plus.
I am responding in my role as manager of the DWP Commercial Management of Medical Services (CMMS) team and on behalf of Darra Singh (Jobcentre Plus Director). CMMS is responsible for managing the performance of Atos Healthcare, who provide Medical Services on behalf of the Department to support Decision Making on sickness and disability related benefits.
I am sorry that you feel we have failed to fully address the matters you raised and that the letter of 29 July from Doug Watkin and those sent on 26 May and 24 June from Commercial Management of Medical Services Team have not resolved your concerns. However, there is little more I can add to Doug's letter.
I can assure you we do take all complaints very seriously and fully investigate them. However, you will appreciate that we do not provide details of the results or action taken as these are internal matters.
The points of concern from your letter dated 4 August 2010 are listed below and responses detailed in that order follow on. These have been sourced, as appropriate, from within the Department and Atos Healthcare.
1. Further the DWP Decision Maker who processed the IB59 should NOT have accepted this poor quatity from Atos Healthcare. The Decision Maker should have returned this form as unacceptable and taken steps against Dr Ilias Macheridis including reporting him to the Medical Services Contract Management Team and the GMC. lt should not be the responsibility of a patient to report a DWP contractor to the GMC. The DWP has a duty of care to the patient. I expect the DWP to exercise this duty in full. Can you explain what steps you are taking against this individual?
2. Please can you provide me the GMC reference for Dr Ilias Macheridis.
3. Please can you arrange for Dr Ilias Macheridis to be removed from the "approved" list" on the grounds that his knowledge of English is not up to standard.
4. Please can you take action against Atos Origin for breach of contract.
5. Please can you ask Atos Healthcare to redo the IB59 by someone qualified and who can both read and write English to the standard specified in the Contract. Once this has been completed please send me a copy and I will decide whether there are grounds for appeal.
6. Please can you note I am STILL expecting a letter from Ms Anita Guy who promised to write to me in the telephone conversation you referred to. As I am unable to write I believed she was going to complete a DLA form on my behalf and send it to me for my approval. I expect outstanding matters to be addressed, to receive an apology and to explain what disciplinary or competency action has been taken against the individuals who have harmed me.
7. Please can you note I am STILL expecting a letter from the Medical Services Contract Management Team over the action they are taking over the multiple breaches of contract, the fact that the Minister was misled in respect of who decides whether a face to face assessment is necessary, the fact they have lost records of who took the decision, the fact that the 90 minutes journey time was ignored, other breaches listed previously, the fact that the doctor should NOT have carried out the assessment as she was not a specialist in my medical condition and the fact that the doctor could neither read nor write Engtish to the level specified in the Contract (the evidence is the unsound ESA85 she produced). Mr James Fay confirmed investigations continue over the misleading of the Minister by Mr Brian Pepper. I expect to receive a full account, an apology and to explain what disciplinary or competency action has been taken against the individuals who have harmed me. Why did the Cardiff Atos office make an illegal appointment in breach of contract?
8. I am pleased that the IB59, as I have attempted to translate it, confirms that a face to face assessment was not necessary, it confirms that the ESA85 dated 24 July 2009 was unsound and a libel. As explained above the IB59 is unsound. This is the third attempt by Atos Healthcare to comply with the Contract and they have failed each time. Can you confirm they have refunded the taxpayer for their repeated mistakes?
9. Given the above evidence can you confirm the "approval" of the doctor who produced the unsound ESA85 has been removed?
10. I note you have not addressed my point that the DWP claim that regular audits are undertaken is not consistent with the DWP written evidence submitted to the Parliamentary Inquiry that the most recent report, was published in 2006 and only covered the 2002-2003 period. I ask again can you clarify?
11. It is clear that Atos Origin misled the Secretary of State over the matter of who decides whether a face to face interview is necessary. Can you confirm that you have written to the current Secretary of State to correct matters, inform him of the behaviour of Atos Origin and can you recommend that AtoS Origin be remOVe from the list of preferred suppliers for future Government contracts?
12. I note you have not addressed the use of the term customer in my letter (www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatoslettersgov.html#DWP20100311T). Can you confirm that it is DWP policy to provide clearer, more easily understood, literature for those whose first language is not English and thus is discriminatory and in breach of equality legislation or explain what steps you are taking to ensure documentation is legal?
13. I would like to point out that there are many legal precedents where a Department of State is fully responsible for the actions of any contractors it chooses to engage. Thus the NAO procedure should have been followed and the process carried out by Mr Geoff Hampshire is not legal. Can you explain why you continue to obstruct justice, defy the Law and refuse to refer this matter to the Independent Case Examiner in conformance to the NAO policy clearly set out?
14. I accept your offer of a Special Payment to cover delay and consequential costs. This is over and above the monies legally due and withheld through the neglect or incompetence of the DWP. I suggest a nominal sum for each item of correspondence similar to that which would be charged by a firm of solicitors. Can you confirm that this is acceptable and I can send you a full account when this matter is resolved to the satisfaction of all parties?
Q1 & Q5. It is appreciated that you have concerns about the quality of the IB59 completed by the Atos doctor. However, the Department considers it fit for purpose, and therefore has not asked for it to be rewritten. Anita Guy from Watford Benefit Delivery Centre has written to you following your conversation in July. She has explained that your case was looked at again but it was decided not to change the decision about your limited capabitity for work. She also explained your options if you feel the decision is wrong. I can advise that the Decision Maker can return for rework any medical advice if they feel it does not meet the purpose intended, for example due to contradicting statements, use of jargon or because it is illegible.
Q2. Dr Ilias Macheridis' General Medical Council (GMC) reference is ..., a full response has been issued to you by the Commercial Management of Medical Services Freedom of Information Officer, reference 1573-2219.
Q3. Atos Healthcare referred your concerns to their Customers Relations Medical Adviser Dr N Kaiper-Holmes who reviewed the information. Dr Kaiper-Holmes has stated, that Dr Ilias Macheridis has not only acted in accordance with Atos Healthcare's Professional Standards but he has agreed with the customer that the latter should be regarded as having both Limited Capability for Work within the parameters of ESA and LCWRA.
He has spelt "further" and "tumour" wrong and has put, "to fulfil", rather than "fulfils" but the meaning is absolutely explicit and clear. What he may not have done is "spellcheck" his reply but the fact that he has correctly spelt "Glioma", "substantial", "Deterioration", "criteria" and "communication" indicates to me that his level of written English is of a high standard. He has also communicated verbally with the GP concerned and had no problems there.
Dr Ilias Macheridis' Medical Manager has stated that he has successfully completed his training in various benefits with Atos Healthcare. She adds that he participates actively in any team meetings and presentatians that he attends. Finally, she advises that she has no concerns with Dr Ilias Macheridis' ability to communicate in the English language.
I can advise that Atos Healthcare undertakes a stringent recruitment process for Healthcare Professionals (HCP) and this includes the assessment of oral communication skills during a formal interview conducted by experienced medical and administrative managers. If the interviewers find that an HCP's oral skills are not of the required standard, then the HCP will not be successful at interview. This ensures that all HCPs who carry out examinations in respect of benefit claims speak the level of English required for the role.
ln addition GMC regulations around language testing follow European Law and are also applied to the NHS. They are as follows:
"lf you are an International Medical Graduate seeking registration practise, you must satisfy us of your knowledge of English. The only exceptions under European law, are:
Nationals of member states of the European Economic Area (EEA) other than the UK
Swiss nationals who since 1 June 2002 benefit under European law.
UK nationals who are exercising their European Community (EC) rights of free movement within the EEA.
UK nationals and non-EEA nationals who are married to EEA nationals who are exercising their EC rights of free movement within the EEA."
Q4. I can advise that as Jobcentre Plus has stated the IB59 was fit for purpose then DWP will not hold Atos Healthcare in breach of contract.
Q6. I apologise for any misunderstanding following your call with Anita when you talked about making a claim for Disability Living Atlowance (DLA). Anita is not in a position to complete an application form for you. You can find out more information concerning DLA via our Directgov website, where you can also make an application on line or print an application form off to complete. You can also call the Benefit Enquiry Line on 0800 88 22 00 for more help.
Q7. We advised in the letter dated 11 January 2010 Ref: FOI 1144-2419 that the HCP who scrutinised your case and thus made the decision that a face to face assessment was required was Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrews. All HCP's are monitored by random quality audit to ensure that their work meets the required quality standards. However Atos Healthcare has confirmed that Nurse Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrews work on this particular case was not reviewed or checked by her manager or others responsible for quality, audit and compliance.
In the letter dated 7 April 2010, Ref: VTR 260 we stated that your assessment was undertaken at the request of Jobcentre Plus.
A response relating to the location of your assessment waS also provided in the letter dated 7 April 2010, Ref: VTR 260 in that our records show that your assessment was arranged to take place at Highgate Medical Examination Centre (MEC), 1 Elthorne Rd, London. All requests for referrals are made by the DWP Benefit Delivery Centre, which registers referrals on a computer system. At this stage a MEC is automatically allocated by the referral system, which is based on the customer's postcode. In your case because your postcode is ... the referral system allocated you to Highgate MEC. There were 2 other MECs - Luton and Romford which, in hindsight, could possibly have been used, however, in both cases "Transport Direct" (a government web site intended to help people using public transporl to plan their journeys) states that the journey times using public transport to both were equal or longer than the journey time to Highgate. Atos provides information from this website to customers; this is in addition to their own location map of the MEC. The provision of transport details is over and above Atos contractual obligations but is an example of the continuing improvements to the service they provide for their customers. The Cardiff office was involved in your referral because it is responsible for booking appointments for a proportion of the assessment centres within the UK.
Whilst Atos continuously review the information they provide to customers, "Transport Direct" is not a source of information that is within their sphere of responsibility and, as such, they are unable to amend or change the information in any way. Therefore, an agreed disclaimer has been added to the journey planner as neither the DWP nor Atos can be held responsible for any erroneous details the website pages may contain.
With regard to the HCP not being a specialist, a response was also provided in the letter dated 7 April 2010, Ref: VTR 260 that in order to provide independent, accurate and authoritative advice and reports it is not necessary for HCPs to hold specialist registration with the GMC.
Regarding your altegation that Mr Pepper misled the Minister, in the letter dated 24 June 2010 ref: 2623 the Independent Tier stated that this was not the case and this has been accepted by DWP.
We believe that all these points have now been fully answered.
Q8. In your letter you state that you are pleased that the IB59 confirms a face to face assessment was not necessary and you also state in the letter that it is unsound and libel. Whilst I cannot reconcile your statements I can advise also that DWP will not request a refund from Atos Healthcare because medical advice returned to Atos Healthcare to be reworked is undertaken at Atos Healthcare's own expense.
Q9. I can confirm at this stage that the approval of the HCP who completed the ESA85 has not been revoked. However, as stated in the letter dated 6 May 2010 Ref 1333-858 the DWP Chief Medical Adviser will consider appropriate action on completion of the GMC investigation into your complaint.
If you now have a response from the GMC please forward it to:
DWP Chief Medical Adviser Caxton House Tothill Street LondonQl0. It is not clear from your questions which audits you are referring to. All HCP's employed by Atos Healthcare are subject to regular random quality audit. There are a number of performance targets that Atos Healthcare must meet and these are reviewed at monthly Performance Review Meetings. There are several other forms of meeting between DWP and Atos Healthcare at which performance is discussed. In addition, as stated in the letter dated 6 May 2010 Ref 1333-858, regular internal audits are undertaken by the Departmental Audit team to ensure that all commercial contracts are being managed effectively.
However, I can confirm that the Department has not exercised its contractual right to access for the purposes of auditing Atos Healthcare's compliance with its contractual obligations.
Qll. As previously advised the decision to refer a case to Atos Healthcare for medical advice is made by Jobcentre Plus; the actual process can then differ dependant on benefit type. In the case of Incapacity Benefit and Employment and Support Allowance, a pre-board check is completed on cases to see if the medical evidence on file substantiates the stated level of disability and that a face to face assessment is not required. lf, in the opinion of the HCP conducting the pre-board check, there is insufficient evidence on file to substantiate the stated level of disability then an invitation to attend a medical assessment will be issued.
As such the Department does not believe the Minister has been misled on this matter and all other issues raised have been covered by letter dated 24 June 2010 Ref 2623.
Ql2. Your concerns regarding the use of the terms Claimant and Customer have been addressed in previous correspondence dated 9 February 2010 Ref FOI 2565. For the purposes of the Medical Services Contract the terms customer and claimant are used to differentiate between Atos Healthcare's customer, DWP and the DWP customer. However, as an agent of DWP, Atos Healthcare is expected to refer to "claimants" as customers in their correspondence and operational dealings with those individuals.
In the letter dated 24 June 2010, ref: 2623 a response to your second point about equality, the following link was provided to provide you with full information about DWP Policy on Diversity and Equality. http://www.dwp.gov.uk/about-dwp/diversity-and-equality
In the letter dated 24 June 2010, ref: 2623 it was stated that whilst Atos Healthcare is currently contracted to supply medical services to DWP, they are not regarded, nor listed as a preferred supplier because under the European Directive, contracts over a certain monetary threshold are subject to open competitive tender.
Ql3 In the letter dated 24 June 2010, ref: 2623 a response was provided to this uestion where it was explained that Atos Healthcare cannot make use of the Independent Case Examiner (ICE) but that individual customers may use their services in appropriate circumstances. DWP are not able to approach the ICE direct concerning a case. ICE accepts cases direct from individuals who are unsatisfied with the service they have received from DWP. DWP does fully cooperate with their investigations. For your convenience I have included their contact details again. ICE can be contacted by telephone (0845 606 0777), in writing (PO Box 155, Chester CH99 9SA), or by email (ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk). Full details are available on the ICE website at www.ind-case-exam.org.uk.
Ql4 In recognition of the delay and inconvenience caused Jobcentre Plus has now decided to award you a Special Payment of £75 which should have been in your bank account by the end of August. If you would like to send in details of any costs you have incurred whilst corresponding with us we will consider reimbursing them. Please send any details to Anita Guy at Luton Benefit Delivery Centre, Ascot Road, Watford, WD99 1AB.
Yours sincerely
Hilary Brierley
Commercial Management of Medical Services
The statement that the Department has not exercised its contractual right to access for the purposes of auditing Atos Healthcare's compliance with its contractual obligations conflicts with a statement Atos Healthcare made to the BBC in 25 May 2010.
Statement in full from Atos Healthcare which carries out work capability assessments in relation to the new Employment Support Allowance.
...
"Atos Healthcare is continually monitored and audited by the DWP to ensure that it completes the highest standard of assessment and that medical advice is correct.
...
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10159850 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10159850)
Department for Work and Pensions Commercial Directorate Our address Commercial Management of Medical Services. Governnment Buildings, Norcross Lane, Thornton, Lancashire FY5 3TA Our phone number 01253 611553 Website www.dwp.gov.uk Our Ref 2848/2895/CE117034 Date: 13 September 2010Dear Mr B...
Thank-you for your email to Mr Fay dated 7th Sept 2010. I am responding in my role as manager of the Department for Work and Pensions Commercial Management of Medical Services team. This team is responsible for managing the performance of Atos Healthcare, who provide Medical Services on behalf of the Department to support Decision Making on sickness and disability related benefits.
In your email you explain that you are content with the information sent to you 26th August 2010 regarding Dr Ilias Macheridis GMC reference number; however you remain concerned about aspects of the contractual process:
1) Reading and writing English to the standard required 2) Face to face assessment criteria 3) The use of the terms Customer and ClaimantI can confirm that our recent response to you on 3rd September 2010, and previous correspondence referred to in that letter, addresses all of the issues you raise.
Yours sincerely
Hilary Brierley
Deputy Head of Commercial Management of Medical Services
The cover letter, the letter from Hilary Brierley, Deputy Head of Commercial Management of Medical Services to my MP and a copy of the letter from Hilary Brierley, Deputy Head of Commercial Management of Medical Services to me addressing the 14 points as above dated 9 September.
HOUSE OF COMMONS London SW1A 0AA Tel: 020 7219 3000 13th September 2010Dear Mr B...
Please find attached a copy of correspondence recently received from Ms Hilary Brierley, Commercial Manager - Medical Services, Department for Work and Pensions, in response to representations made an your behalf regarding the performance of Atos Healthcare.
I am still awaiting replies from the Secretaries of State for Justice and Work & Pensions, and will contact you again as soon as I hear further.
Yours sincerely
... MP
Representing ...
The letter from Hilary Brierley, Deputy Head of Commercial Management of Medical Services to my MP.
Department for Work and Pensions Commercial Directorate ... MP Our address Commercial Management of House of Commons Medical Services. London Room 306 SWlA OAA Norcross, Governnment Buildings, Norcross Lane, Thornton, Lancashire FY5 3TA Our phone number 01253 611553 Website www.dwp.gov.uk Our ref: POS(2)11058/O159/2909 3 September 2010 Re: Mr B... NlNO ... Dear Mr ...Your letter sent on 26 August 2010 to Darra Singh, Chief Executive of Jobcentre Plus in respect of Mr B... has been sent to me to respond in my role as manager of the DWP Commercial Management of Medical Services team. This team is responsible for managing the performance of Atos Healthcare, who provide Medical Services on behalf of the Department to support Decision Making on sickness and disability related benefits.
I have attached copies of the letters that have been sent to Mr B... in response to the 14 points that he raised in his original letter dated 4 August 2010.
I trust this is helpful and if I can be of any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact me.
Yours sincerely
Hilary Brierley
Commercial Manager - Medical Services
Mrs A Guy ESA WCA Team Leader, ESA - Jobcentre Plus Luton BDC, Ascot Road, Watford WD99 1AB 29 September 2010 Dear Mrs Guy NI Ref: ...Regarding your letter dated 6 September 2010 which contains substantive errors of fact. It does not agree with the information provided by Atos Healthcare. It does not agree with the information provided by my MP from the Minister for Disabled People and provided by Darra Singh Chief Executive Jobcentre Plus.
I would like you to review, once again, and take actions consistent with the Welfare Reform Act, the Contract between the DWP and Atos Origin and the correspondence mentioned above.
I would like to defer, once again, a decision to appeal pending receipt of a medically sound copy of form IB59 that reflects my medical condition in July 2009.
We now know that Nurse Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrews, in blatant breach of the Contract, decided on receipt of the ESA50 that a face to face assessment was necessary. All have agreed that she should have asked the advice of a Medical Advisor who in turn should have consulted with my GP and or consultants. The result would have been that I would have been placed in the ESA Support Group in July 2009.
Your responsibility now is to ask Atos Healthcare to produce a sound IB59 that reflects my medical condition in July 2009. They need to contact my GP and or consultants and confirm how serious my condition was at that time. Please check that this is written in English as the Atos doctor that produced the IB59 dated 23 April 2010 is under investigation by the GMC as this IB59 was not written to the standard of English which the GMC expects medical documents to conform with.
Please send me a copy of the IB59 that reflects my medical condition in July 2009 as soon as possible. I assume it will confirm I should have been placed in the support group at that time. If this is the case, please calculate the monies owed and arrange for my account to be credited with this sum. If this is not the case, I will appeal as my serious condition at the time, including emergency admission to hospital, is not in dispute.
Nurse Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrews is under investigation by the NMC. The face to face assessment was unnecessary and caused me injury. The assessment by the Atos doctor constituted an assault. The ESA85 that was produced is a libel and the Atos Doctor who produced this unsound medical document is subject to a GMC investigation. The Ministry of Justice has been asked to investigate whether Atos has undue influence, in breach of the Civil Service Code, on individuals in the DWP. One factor is the reluctance of the DWP to enforce the Contract between the DWP and Atos. Submitted as evidence is the reluctance of Luton BDC to reject the IB59 dated 23 April 2010 as substandard.
I refer you to the 3 September 2010 letter from Hilary Brierley where she agrees that you will reimburse my costs. My costs up to the end of September 2010 are difficult to calculate but I will accept a nominal sum of two thousand (£2,000) pounds to take into account the assault, injury, legal consultations and correspondence costs. This is in addition to the sum mentioned above relating to under payment.
Finally I appreciate your honesty in your admittance of negligence in not replying to my letter of August 2009. On a personal note my medical condition has significantly deteriorated. I am now practically house bound and have lost most of the use of my right leg and cannot write due to twitching. The medicines I am taking are just about keeping the pain and twitching under control. Climbing stairs is very difficult and I am very very weak all the time. I do not feel I have much time left so would appreciate it if you could take action as swiftly as possible. I look forward to hearing from you.
Yours sincerely
Mr B...
Medically during October I was in "the slough of despond". The team at ... hospital were excellent. All aspects, the transport, the porters, the cleaners, the food, the healthcare assistants, the nurses, the occupational therapists, the physio-therapists, the neuro-psychoanalysts, the pharmacists, the doctors, the surgeons and the consultants were brilliant. I am now on vast, in my lay view, quantities of medication which has, so far (last few days), dealt with the focal fits. The medication needs to increase for the next few weeks and then radio therapy. I am overwhelmed by the wonders of medical science.
My lay view is that these miracle workers are underpaid, undermanned and underresourced. This is another fight which, for now, I do not have the strength to take on.
I think I have to inform the DWP if admitted to hospital so that they can cut my benefit. It seems unreasonable as costs do not fall. Costs increase due to cost of travel of visitors etc.
Mrs A Guy ESA WCA Team Leader, ESA - Jobcentre Plus Luton BDC, Ascot Road, Watford WD99 1AB 1 November 2010 Dear Mrs Guy NI Ref: ...I note you have still not replied to my letter dated 29 September 2010.
For your information, I was in ... hospital from Friday 8 October to Monday 25 October 09:51 for biopsy, seizures, epilepsy, multiple daily focal fits, pain etc. I am very weak. I need to take lots of medicine. I am somewhat stable if I sleep 16+ hours per day. I have a brain tumour grade 3 oligoastrocytoma. It is growing. The size is now that of a small orange. Radiotherapy is due to start 11 November for 6 weeks. My right side has got worse.
Yours sincerely
Apology for not acknowledging letter.
Jobcentreplus Department for Work and Pensions Office of the District Manager Beauver House 6 Bricket Road St Albans AL1 3JU Tel 01727 773334 www.dwp.gov.uk 1 November 2010 Dear Mr B...,Thank you for your letter of 29 September 2010 concerning Atos Healthcare. I do apologise for not acknowledging this letter at the time.
We aim to reply to all correspondence within ten working days. However it is taking us longer than anticipated to obtain all the information we require to respond to the issues that you raised. Please accept our apologies and we hope to send you a full answer to your queries as soon as possible.
If you require any further information please contact us via the details given at the top of this letter
Yours sincerely,
Di Newman, Correspondence Team
In January I was very very tired after six weeks of radio-therapy in November and December 2010.
Letter from the DWP dated 31 December 2010 but which was received 8 January 2011. It seems typical of the DWP to back date letters.
Jobcentreplus Department for Work and Pensions Office of the District Manager Beauver House 6 Bricket Road St Albans AL1 3JU Tel 01727 773334 www.dwp.gov.uk 31 December 2010 Dear Mr B...,Thank you for your letters of 29 September and 1 November to Mrs A Guy. They have been passed to me for answer as District Manager of Jobcentre Plus for Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire due to the nature of the issues you have raised.
I apologise for the delay in replying to you. We aim to reply to all correspondence within ten working days. I am sorry that we have not achieved this and that you have not received the level of service you have a right to expect from us.
Thank you for letting us know your current medical status. I hope that all goes well with the planned treatment.
As Anita explained in her letter of 6 September, we have not revised our decision of 29 July 2009 and therefore have not changed the group you were placed in for Employment and Support Allowance between 11 July 2009 and 28 April 2010. We accept that your condition has deteriorated from 29 April 2010 however the information available at the time of your assessment on 24 July 2009 did not show that you met the Support Group criteria.
A Medical Services Advice minute, IB59, does not exist for July 2009 because at that time there was no correspondence or query between Jobcentre Plus and Atos Healthcare concerning your case. The IB59 is only used when communication is required about a particular case between Jobcentre Plus and Atos Healthcare. Therefore not every case will have a completed IB59.
As part of our appeal process a claim is fully reviewed on receipt of an appeal before a case is submitted to the Tribunals Service. We will not review your case again before we receive an appeal from you.
I hope this letter has helped to clarify the matter. If you require any further Information Stuart Fraser, Employment and Support Allowance Manager at Luton Benefit Delivey Centre (BDC) will be pleased to help. Stuart can be contacted by post at Jobcentre Plus, Luton BDC, Ascot Road, Watford. WD99 1AA by telephone on 01582 681333, or by email at stuart.fraser@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk.
If you feel that my reply fails to address the issues you raise satisfactorily, please contact Darra Singh, Chief Executive of Jobcentre Plus. Darra, or a Director of Jobcentre Plus, will then review your issues as this is the next stage of our complaints process. Darra can be contacted by post at Jobcentre Plus, Level 6, Caxton House, Tothill Street, London, SWlH 9NA, by telephone on 0207 8293364 or by email at darra.singh@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk.
Yours sincerely
Carolyn Taylor District Manager Jobcentre Plus Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire
Once again the points of substance are ignored. The previous agreement by the DWP to compensate is ignored.
Email to Darra Singh, Chief Executive of Jobcentre Plus dated 1 February 2011 and copied to Stuart Fraser, ESA Manager, Luton BDC Jobcentre Plus DWP requesting Darra Singh to review.
1 February 2011
Dear Darra Singh
Further to the letter dated 31 December 2010 which I received 8 January 2011 from Carolyn Taylor, District Manager, Jobcentre Plus, Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire, the apology letter dated 1 November 2010 from Di Newman, Correspondence Team and my letter dated 29 September 2010, I find the response unacceptable and would like you to review the response. I am still extremely weak following six weeks of radiotherapy and this is the first time I have sufficient energy to contact you.
Next week I am scheduled for my first MRI scan following the radiotherapy. My oncology consultant will see me three weeks after. I suggest the DWP is delaying matters as far as possible because a patient like myself with a brain tumour the size of a small orange is not likely to live long. Before my illness it was inconceivable that a Government department would have such a cavalier attitude to their statutory duty of care. My case and the publication of all correspondence on my website has shown many what can be expected from the DWP to the dying, the sick, the disabled and their carers. Does honour, the word of the DWP and duty of care by the DWP mean nothing? For shame!
Please can you respond to each paragraph in my letter dated 29 September 2010. In previous correspondence I have been promised compensation, I have previously suggested a not unreasonable figure considering the way the DWP has handled my case and the libel of myself by the DWP and your contractor Atos Healthcare.
I would point out that the Nursing & Midwifery Council in a letter dated 3 December 2010 (http://www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatoslettersgov.html#NMC20101203F) has found sufficient evidence against Nurse Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrews that her case has been referred to the independent Investigating Committee. It was Nurse Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrews that decided a face to face meeting was necessary in breach of contract, in breach of medical practice defined in the contract and in breach of medical ethics. Her actions were detrimental to my health. Why do you not take action against Atos Healthcare in respect of this flagrant breach of contract?
Further I would like you to review the case in respect of the Bribery Act 2010 and the predecessor statutory acts such as the Prevention of Corruption Acts 1889-1916. Why did the DWP mislead the Secretary of State? Why did Hilary Brierley, Commercial Management of Medical Services in a letter dated 3 September 2010 state, "However, I can confirm that the Department has not exercised its contractual right to access for the purposes of auditing Atos Healthcare's compliance with its contractual obligations."? Please can you explain this state of affairs. A reasonable person would be likely to conclude Atos Healthcare has offered inducements to "look the other way". Can you explain what steps have you taken to ensure corruption has not taken place?
I look forward to hearing from you. I expect a reply within the time period standards that you claim you adhere to. Please acknowledge that you have received this email within 10 working days.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely
Email from Jobcentre Plus St Albans acknowledging email.
Thank you for your email yesterday to Darra Singh. You should received a full response from us by 20 February.
Yours sincerely Andrea Wood Andrea Wood Beds & Herts Communications Team Beauver House 6 Bricket Road St Albans AL1 3JU 01727 773312
Extract of letter from the DWP informing of changes to the amount of benefits to be paid from 14 April 2011.
Your reference is ... Please tell us this number if you get in touch with us Luton BDC Jobcentre Plus Ascot Road Watford WD99 1AB Date 8 February 2011 Phone 0845 6088627 TEXTPHONE for the deaf/hard of hearing ONLY 0845 6O88551Dear Mr B...
YOUR CLAIM FOR EMPLOYMENT AND SUPPORT ALLOWANCE
CHANGES IN SOCIAL SECURITY BENEFITS
From 11 April 2011 the rates of Social Security benefits will change.
You are required to immediately report any change in your circumstances to us, or the circumstances of your partner if you have one.
The attached sheet shows how we worked out your money. If you want more information please get in touch with us. Our phone number and address are at the top of this letter.
We will pay this new amount from your first payday after this date.
OTHER HELP YOU MAY BE ENTITLE TO
You may be entitled to other help. To find out more about this ask us for leaflet INF2 "Other help you may be entitled to"
HOUSING BENEFIT AND COUNCIL TAX BENEFIT
You could get Housing Benefit or Council Tax Benefit. Get in touch with your local council as soon as possible. If you are already getting Housing Benefit or Council Tax Benefit you should show them this letter.
IF YOU WANT TO KNOW MORE ABOUT THIS DECISION OR IF YOU THINK IT IS WRONG
Please contact us and we will give an explanation. Our address and phone number are at the top of this letter. You should contact us within one month of the date of this letter, or we may not be able to consider any dispute.
WHAT HAPPENS AFTER THE DECISION IS LOOKED AT AGAIN
If the decision can be changed we will send you a new decision. If we cannot change the decision we will tell you why. You will still have the right of appeal against the decision.
HOW TO APPEAL
To appeal, fill in the form in leaflet GL24 "If you think our decision is wrong". Please send it to us within one month of the date of this letter. You can get this leaflet from your Jobcentre Plus Office. Your appeal will be heard by an independent appeal tribunal.
If the decision is wrong, the independent appeal tribunal can change it. But the independent appeal tribunal cannot:
- change the law that the decision is based on;
- pay more money than the law allows;
- check or change your contribution record.
If you disagree with our record of your contributions, please tell us at once. We will check your records and tell you the result. If you still disagree you can ask for a formal decision.
Jobcentre Plus staff work to offer a complete service through your Jobcentre. If you have an enquiry about your claim for Employment and Support Allowance you will be referred to the Decision Maker or appeals section.
PLEASE KEEP THIS LETTER FOR YOUR INFORMATION It will help us if you have this letter when you make any enquiries or need an explanation about the decision.
How Employment and Support Allowance has been worked out The Employment and Support Allowance Award The payment of Employment and Support Allowance is based on your National Insurance Contribution records and any additional amount the law says you need to live on. We call this Contributory based and Income Related Employment and Support Allowance. Your living expenses £67.50 Limited capability for work addition Extra Money because you are in £32.35 the Support Group For the first week in December a Christmas Bonus payment of £0.00 will be made. Which gives a total £99.85 Employment and Support Allowance amount Income and Benefits No income will be taken off your Employment and Support Allowance Your Employment and Support Allowance amount of £99.85 less total income of £0.00O So your entitlement is £99.85 The amounts on this page apply from 14 April 2Ol1. Yours sincerely ... Manager
Evasive letter not addressing the substantive points.
Jobcentre Plus Room 6.37 , Caxton House, Tothill Street, London SW1H 9NA Telephone 020 7829 3364 Darra Singh, OBE Chief Executive darra.singh@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk www.jobcentreplus.gov.uk Our ref: CE O119827 21 February 2011 Dear Mr B...Thank you for your email of 1 February to Darra Singh, Chief Executive of Jobcentre Plus, concerning your Employment and Support Allowance (ESA). I am replying on behalf of Mr Singh as one of the Directors of Jobcentre Plus. As you have requested, we have looked again at your letter of 29 September 2010 and I have responded below to each paragraph of your letter in order.
You asked us to review whether the information Luton Benefit Delivery Centre (BDC) gave you in the letter of 6 September 2010 was contradictory with information given by the Minister for Disabled People and Darra Singh in earlier correspondence. There is no contradiction in the information and the information in the 6 September 2010 letter is correct.
You asked us to review your case and take action consistent with the Welfare Reform Act. As we explained in our letter of 31 December 2010, you have the opportunity to appeal our decisions when you disagree with them. As part of your appeal we will fully review your case in the light of any appeal that you make. If we are unable to change, it we will forward your appeal to be heard by an Independent Tribunal.
You said in your letter that you wished to defer any appeal until we provided an IB59 that reflected your medical condition in July 2009. We also explained in our letter of 31 December 2010 that IB59 forms are not completed in every case and that there is no IB59 for the medical examination you attended in July 2009.
You have asserted that Atos Healthcare were in breach of their contract by requiring you to attend the medical examination in July 2009. This is not the case. All thase who receive ESA are required to undertake the assessment unless they meet specific exemption criteria. You also assert that you would
have been placed in the Support Group if you not attended the assessment. We do not accept that conclusion.
You state that we have a responsibility to produce an IB59 in relation to the assessment of July 2009. This is not the case. We explained the purpose of the IB59 to you in our letter of 31 December 2010 and that they may not be used in evey case. We responded to your concerns regarding Dr Ilias Macheridis and the IB59 produced in April 201O in our letter of 3 September from Hilary Brierley.
In her letter, Hilary Brierley explained that we found the doctor's report to be easily understood despite the spelling mistakes. We did not need to ask for it to be reworked and made our decision based on the information it contained. Any appeal against our decision should normally be made within one month but late appeals can sometimes be accepted. The decision on whether a late appeal can be accepted will be made by the Tribunals Service when they receive you appeal. We will provide them with information from your letters to us when they consider this.
I cannot comment on your statements about your allegations of assault, bribery and libel in your letter of 29 September 2010 or your email of 1 February. I will also not comment on any Nursing and Midwifery Council and General Medical Council investigations of named Atos Healthcare employees nor about any investigation by the Ministry of Justice. Should any of these investigations require our co-operation we will be happy to provide it. As I have mentioned earlier, we have accepted that the information in the IB59 dated 23 April 2010 is clear despite the spelling errors. We will not reject it as substandard.
In her letter of 3 September 2010, Hilary Brierley explained that we are prepared to consider reimbursing you for any costs you incurred while we have been corresponding with you. She explained that you should send details of these to us at Luton BDC. We cannot consider the nominal amount you mention in your letter without a breakdown of what these costs were along with supporting information such as invoices, receipts or itemised statements.
In your e-mail of 1 February you asked us to look at why Hilary Brierley stated that we had not exercised our contractual right to audit Atos Healthcare's compliance with the contract. In her letter Hilary had explained the processes we have in place to ensure that Atos Healthcare meet the performance and quality targets defined by the contract. Under Clause 10.1 of the contract we can further obtain reasonable access to information when we need to do so for the purpose of;
supplying information for parliamentary, judicial or other administrative purposes;
audit compliance with contractual obligations;
audit activities, security and integrity in connection with the provision of services.
Atos Healthcare provide the Department with sufficient data to monitor its contractual compliance and have fully cooperated with previous National Audit Office examinations. We have found no cause to seek additional access. We do not believe that your complaints constitute reasonable grounds, as expressed within Clause 1O, for us to seek access to further information.
I hope this letter has helped to clarify these matters. I note your comments on the extent to which your health has deteriorated and I realise that this will be a disappointing response for you. I have explained that you may still appeal and we have also explained the role of the Independent Case Examiner in earlier letters to you.
If you are not satisfied with the action taken by Jobcentre Plus, you can contact the Independent Case Examiner (ICE) within six months from the date of this letter. ICE offers a free impartial resolution service but does not consider matters of law or government policy. ICE can be contacted by telephone (0845 606 0777), in writing (PO Box 155, Chester CH99 9SA), or by email (ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk). Full details are available on the ICE website at www.ind-case-exam.org.uk.
Alternatively, if you require any further information, Stuart Fraser, Employment and Support Allowance Manager at Luton Benefit Delivey Centre (BDC) will be pleased to help. Stuart can be contacted by post at Luton BDC, Ascot Road, Watford, WD99 1AB, by telephone on 01582 681333, or by email at stuart.fraser@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk.
MATTHEW NICHOLAS EMPLOYERS AND STAKEHOLDERS DIRECTOR ON BEHALF OF THE CHIEF EXECUTlVE
Response to evasive letter not addressing the substantive points.
Date: 15 March 2011 16:31 To: darra.singh@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk Cc: stuart.fraser@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk Subject: Evasive Response to my Request for ReviewDear Darra Singh,
In response to the letter written on your behalf by Matthew Nicholas, DWP Director of the 21 February 2011. It is, as I expected evasive, and failed to address the substantive failures made by the DWP in protecting me from the consequences of the lies and libel that Atos Healthcare delivered in the "medical" advice that they provided to the DWP Decision Maker and in the subsequent cover up by Atos Healthcare.
I treat, with utter contempt, your feigned concern for my medical condition. It is another clear example of your evasion in that if you did care for my condition you would follow the moral imperative i.e. your duty of care.
I note that in your letter you did not address your duty of care to me as a patient. Clearly in your mind as a disabled person I am worth far less that an able bodied person. I have some sympathy with this view. I am for the first time in my life in need of DWP assistance. It is evasive for you to say that you comply with the rules and regulations yet make it as hard as possible to provide assistance. I ask you to be honest and confirm the truth that is a DWP objective to avoid or evade making payments to as many disabled people as possible for as long as possible.
Clearly you are meeting your objective as the level of suicides of DWP "customers" increases. Increasingly those denied benefits through the evasive wiles of the DWP depend on charity food parcels, soup kitchens etc or sit in homes without heating and lighting waiting to be so ill that they are admitted to hospital. How proud you must be of your reduced payments! I expect your success is reflected in your remuneration.
I can see the advantages of your utilitarian view of making life difficult for those who no longer can contribute to the state. Clearly the DWP has turned a Nelsonian eye to the Human Rights Act 1998, the European Convention on Human Rights and the UN Universal Declaration of Human Rights. I would like you to be honest and confirm the reason for your action.
By using Atos Healthcare to provide medical advice you distance the DWP from any responsibility in respect of medical opinion. It is evasive for you to suggest the matter be referred to the Independent Tribunal. You know as well as I that the Tribunal considers process and specifically excludes medical opinion. Look how many Tribunals have been reported as stating words to the effect: "It not within the competency of the Tribunal to consider the veracity of medical opinion". I agree with the Tribunal in this respect. If the DWP does not carry out audits there is no firm evidence of the medical wrong doing of Atos Healthcare.
My medical condition and the information available to the DWP was unchanged when the DWP decided to change its decision to place me in the Support Group. Unlike Einstein who stated "God does not play dice", the DWP appears to play dice in deciding to award or deny payments. You state that the DWP did not have a responsibility to produce an IB59 in July 2009 and yet the DWP eventually produced one without any further medical information. Was this negligence or incompetence? Or was it that the DWP lied to the Secretary of State regarding who carried out the assessment of the ESA albeit, presumably, because Atos Healthcare lied to the DWP?
I suggest that the DWP was concerned that the DWP might be implicated in that the DWP is charged with auditing Atos Healthcare. It is evasive for you to repeat that the Contract states that audits should be carried out. You have confirmed, by ommision, in your letter that Hilary Brierley was correct in her statement that the DWP does not choose to audit. If the DWP had audited Atos Healthcare, it would have found that a nurse decided a cancer patient should attend an face to face assessment and thus was in flagrant breach of the Contract. The DWP does not audit Atos Healthcare so that the DWP can deny any responsibility for the actions of Atos Healthcare. The DWP, by its actions or lack of actions, appears to be interested in denying payments to as many patients as possible and are aided and abetted in this by Atos Healthcare.
It is evasive of you not to address why the DWP does not follow the NAO audit procedure, please refer to previous correspondence, regarding the "Atos Independent Tier". If the DWP followed the NAO procedure the DWP would not be able to deny any responsibility for the actions of Atos Healthcare. The DWP prefers an evasive procedure allowing Atos Healthcare to self regulate keeping the DWP outside the process and therefore the DWP can deny responsibility and liability. The DWP cannot rely on the "Eichmann" defence. The DWP is responsible for all the actions of the contractors of the DWP. You have been informed of the misdeeds of Atos Healthcare. You could, through audit, take action to ensure Atos Healthcare conforms to the Contract. You, as leader of the DWP, choose to do nothing. I have a brain tumour and my judgement may be flawed but I think you act in this way because of neglect, incompetence or you have been bribed. I would be interested in your explanation for this state of affairs.
I previously asked under the Freedom of Information Act to provide me with copies of the audits the DWP have undertaken of Atos Healthcare. The audits are listed in the Contract. You will not be surprised at the response I have received.
It is evasive of you not to consider the role of Unum in the development and implementation of ESA. You are aware that in all the states of the US Unum was found guilty of operating "disability denial factories". Unum were forced to change their procedure, carry out large numbers of reassessment and pay large fines. Clearly if the DWP felt it had a duty of care to a patient, the DWP would make sure that the procedure used in the UK has been amended. Unum, prior to settlement, was described as an outlaw organisation. As the legal systems in the UK and US are so similar, I find it hard to believe that any organisation that implements Unum pre-settlement procedures can be described as anything other than an outlaw organisation. The DWP, as far as I am aware, has not reviewed and amended the ESA process. The DWP declines to audit Atos Healthcare and so can deny responsibility. This suggests that if the DWP operated in the US, in this respect, it would be declared an outlaw organisation and not allowed to operate until it changed the procedure, carried out reassessment of every case and paid a fine.
As a further example of the evasion of the DWP is the failure by the DWP to provide email addresses that can be used by claimants. The DWP seems determined to avoid a trail of emails and letters that can be used in a Tribunal.
In my view the DWP should ask the GMC to provide an independent medical audit of the decisions of Atos Healthcare. The DWP would be given assurance that my case was a one-off.
Alternatively I have previously asked the DWP to provide me with a potassium cyanide capsule that would allow me to end my life and end further costs to the DWP. The DWP has refused. I am sure you could ask an Atos doctor to provide me with a prescription. You could ask the Atos doctor who defamed me by libel or the one who lied to the DWP about who decided the face to face assessment so that the DWP in turn lied to the Secretary of State. I believe a civil servant who lies to the Secretary of State is committing an act of treason. I have never been in favour of capital punishment but I may make an exception for this form of treason.
Regarding compensation, I would like you to treat me without discrimination. The DWP does not require itemised bills from Atos Healthcare as I believe the DWP has stated to a Parliamentary Inquiry. I have justified in my previous letter my request for an ex-gratia payment of £2,000 (two thousand). Requiring invoices etc for a patient with a brain tumour who has received six weeks of radiotherapy is unreasonable. Please review the emails, the letters, the libel and the procrastimation. The amount is not unreasonable. I request you to instruct Luton BDC to pay the amount and not waste more taxpayers or my resources on this trifling matter.
An organisation reflects the morals and standards of their leader. The DWP and you are dishonourable and dishonoured. I expect your reply will be delayed for months hoping that I die in the meantime. Surprise me, pay the monies owed to me, change the ESA procedure in line with the US Unum changes, audit Atos Healthcare and take them to court to retrieve the monies obtained by deception by Atos Healthcare as in my case. Atos Healthcare should be asked to reassess all those denied benefits, be independently audited and in addition follow the NAO Independent Tier procedure.
Maybe quality checking correspondence might help. Perhaps you can point out to Matthew Nicholas the first line on page 2 where I believe the word "had" is missing. It is worrying that a high paid executive of the DWP has difficulty with English grammar. Please review all the letters from the DWP that I have published on my website. Such shoddyness appears to be endemic. I suggest as leader of the DWP it is not a value to be proud of. You can see why I would think clear simple advice for patients or is it claimants or is it customers is something that is actively discouraged by you. I note Parliament and the Legal System always use "claimant". I note when the DWP provides information to Statutory Bodies it uses claimant but in one letter I have had from the DWP I have been referred to as patient, claimant and customer. Explain that!
The DWP as it is now, under your leadership, is a shower. If you were honourable you would resign and let someone more capable handle this difficult, sensitive and most vital of positions.
I apologise for my blunt tone unfortunately pain, tiredness, plus having been given the run around since July 2009 and the evasive latest DWP letter eventually takes its toll and civility suffers. Please write to me and email your response as it is easier for me to publish your reply on my website.
Yours sincerely
Mr B...
Copy to Stuart Fraser, ESA Manager at Luton Benefit Delivery Centre
Apology for delay and claim that all the issues raised has been addressed.
jobcentreplus Department for Work and Pensions Office of the District Manager Beauver House 6 Bricket Road St Albans AL1 3JU Tel: 01727 773312 www.dwp.gov.uk 18 April 2011Dear Mr B...
Thank you for your email of 15 March to Darra Singh. I am sorry for the delay in replying to you.
It has been passed to me for reply as the issues you have raised we have already addressed. If you are still unsatisfied with the service you have received from us you can apply to the Independent Case Examiner (ICE). ICE offers a free, impartial resolution service but does not consider matters of law or government policy. ICE can be contacted by telephone (0845 606 0777), in writing (PO Box 155, Chester CH99 9SA), or by email (ice@dwp.gsi.gov.uk). Full details are available on the ICE website at wwww.ind-case-exam.org.uk.
Yours sincerely ... pp Teresa Chammings District Manager Jobcentre Plus Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire.
Certificate of Pay and Taxable Benefit and Tax Deducted Refunded.
Certificate of Pay and Taxable Benefit and Tax Deducted Refunded - Year to 5 April 2010 Previous employment: ... ... Pay £ 0.00 Tax Deducted £ 0.00 Benefit for Total £ 5040.07 Taxable £ 4933.22 Tax Refunded £ 0.00 current claim Pay and Total for year ... ... .... Taxable £ 4933.22 Net Tax Deducted £ 0.00 benefit PAYE reference ESA500 Final tax code ... NI no ... Date of issue 23/04/11 Benefit Office code ... File Indicator .. Print control ...... P60U Issued by the BA DSS Please read the notes overleaf Notes for the claimant Do not destroy For more information see leaflet IR41 which you can get from any tax or benefit office 1. Jobseekers Allowance is subject to tax. 2. This form shows details of benefit and tax paid up to 5 April. It will help you to check your tax assessment or to fill in your tax return if you are sent either of these. Keep your P60U in a safe place as you cannot get another one. 3. If you think the amount of taxable benefit is wrong ask the benefit office for an explanation at once. If you are not satisfied, you have 60 days from the date of this certificate to make an objection, in writing. giving your reasons. If you do not object in writing with in 60 days you cannot question the amount of taxable benefit later. 4. If you have any questions about your tax affairs ask your tax office. If however you have a query about taxable benefit get in touch with your benefit office.
Email to DWP requesting clarification of situation in respect of the ESA50 form and for Atos to cease and desist harassment.
To: stuart.fraser@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk CC: darra.singh@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk; customer-relations@atoshealthcare.com Subject: Status Date 27 May 2011 Dear Sir, NI Ref: ... 1. Please can you provide me with information on my NI contributions record. 2. I have recently received a request dated 26 April 2011 reference ... from Atos Healthcare to once again complete an ESA50 03/11 Form. The covering letter requested me to fill in the questionnaire no later than 10 June 2011. Today I received a reminder letter dated 25 May 2011 I refer you to the letter from Darra Singh dated 21 February 2011 in particular the statement that I have six months from this date to refer my case, which dates back to June 2009, to the Independent Case Examiner. I am still considering the matter. I would like to defer the need to complete another ESA50 until all legal avenues of redress have been exhausted. 3. You will be aware that a panel of the NMC Investigating Committee considered the case of Nurse Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrews on 11 May 2011. In a letter dated 3 December 2010 the NMC wrote to me that they were investigating "whether there is sufficient evidence to justify referral for a hearing". In a letter dated 24 March 2011 the NMC confirmed that the hearing will take place on 11 May 2011. This inquiry is held in private. In a letter dated 17 May 2011 the panel noted my allegation that the Nurse failed to read information on the ESA50 form. They noted that the Nurse's employers had investigated the matter. Under case law the panel are required to see if the misconduct is easily remedial and whether it has been remedied. It appears that the Nurse is able to read and Atos Healthcare have assured the NMC that they conduct audits of the assessments. The letter did not say why the misconduct happened and why Atos Healthcare failed in my case. I remind you that this Nurse who, in breach of the Contract between the DWP and Atos and in breach of medical ethics, decided that a face to face assessment was necessary in my case. 4. The previous Secretary of State for Work and Pensions informed me, based on information provided by the DWP which I assume was based on information from Atos Healthcare, that the decision that a face to face assessment was made by a medically competent authority. This was not true in my case. I have not heard that the Parliamentary record has been corrected. I have not heard that approval has been removed from this Nurse by the DWP. I hope that appearing before the NMC panel will underline the importance to this Nurse and Atos Healthcare of reading the ESA50 and applying the rules defined by more competent medical authorities. 5. You are aware of the details of my medical condition and in particular my difficulties in writing. If the DWP does require me to complete the ESA50 questionnaire again, I would be pleased if the DWP completes it for me, using the information as in the 15 June 2009 version and the medical information I have provided to the DWP in subsequent correspondence. Please note I saw my oncology consultant Dr ... at ...Hospital yesterday for the results of the MRI scan taken three weeks earlier. My brain tumour has not changed significantly from last time (February 2011) and my next scan is to be scheduled for 4 months (September 2011). My symptoms are intermittent and I, as a lay person, am unable to assess my capabilties. Most days I still need 16 plus hours of sleep and rest. I have memory, concentration, balance, mobility and vision issues and experience some pain at times. The occurrence of these symptoms are not predictable. I do physiotherapy exercises as much as I can to build back my right side. With my consultant's agreement I have ceased taking Diazepram, which I took for the extreme pain during fits and to reduce the amplitude and force of my arm and leg thrashing. I would like to reduce the anti-convulsant drugs I take daily. You are welcome to contact my GP and or my consultants at ...Hospital. 6. It is frustrating and depressing that despite removing my CV from job sites, weekly I receive job descriptions for 50K-70K IT jobs which I would be perfect for. You may be aware of my top flight IT skills. Try entering "DWP ESA Atos" in any search engine! 7. If the ESA50 needs to be produced, I would prefer the ESA50 information supplied to me in electronic form so that it can be published more easily on my website. 8. If the ESA50 needs to be produced, I would further like to know the name of the medically qualified individual that will assess whether a face to face assessment is now necessary, given that it was not required previously and my medical condition has deteriorated from the state it was on the 15 June 2009. 9. Please can you inform Atos Healthcare to cease and desist their harassment of me until such time as a competent medical authority with full access to all the facts, my GP or consultants, have confirmed that my medical condition has changed sufficiently to the better. Please acknowledge this email and let me know if you have any comments that you feel needs further discussion. I look forward to hearing from you. Yours faithfully Mr B... Copy to Customer Relations Atos Healthcare
Of course this email was not acknowledged. I have until 20 August to refer the matter once again to the Independent Case Examiner.
This letter is a response from the DWP to my previous email. No apology again for failing to meet the ten day acknowledgment target. As I sent email evidence on the 19 July 2011 to the Prof Harrington Independent Review it seems to much of a coincidence that the two matters are not related. It reinforces the impression that to get the DWP and Atos numpties to comply with the targets that have been set and the Contract that has been agreed requires the intervention of Parliament or those with the authority of Parliament. Without such intervention all appears to be lost.
Department for Work and Pensions Office of the District Manager Beauver House 6 Bricket Road St Albans AL1 3JU Tel: 01727 773312 www.dwp.gov.uk 25 July 2011 Dear Mr B...Thank you for your email of 27 May to Stuart Fraser. I am replying as District Manager of Jobcentre Plus in Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire.
HM Revenue and Customs administer National lnsurance contribution records. They can be contacted via the website Directgov or by telephone on 0845 3001479.
As you are aware all customers in receipt of Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) are required to complete regular Work Capability Assessments (WCA). The first part of an assessment is the completion of a questionnaire (ESA50). Due to the information we currently hold concerning your health issues, Atos Healthcare have written direct to your medical practitioner for information to update our records. To date they have not received a reply.
The other issues you have raised we have already addressed. I hope this letter has helped to clarify the remaining matters. If you require any further information, Anita Guy, ESA WCA Team Leader at Luton Benefit Centre will be pleased to help. Anita can be contacted by post at Luton Benefit Centre, Ascot Road, Watford, WD99 lAB, by telephone on 01582 681347, or by email at anita.guy@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk.
If you feel that my reply fails to address the issues you raise satisfactorily, please contact Darra Singh, Chief Executive of Jobcentre Plus. Darra, or a Director of Jobcentre Plus, will then review your issues as this is the next stage of our complaints process. Darra can be contacted by post at Jobcentre Plus, Level 6, Caxton House, Tothill Street, London, SW1H 9NA, by telephone on 0207 8293364 or by email at darra.singh@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk.
Yours sincerely
Teresa Chammings District Manager Jobcentre Plus Bedfordshire and HeMordshire.
Email to the DWP thanking for finally complying with the Contract and asking that the Nurse and Doctor be removed from the approval list.
To: anita.guy@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk CC: teresa.chammings@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk darra.singh@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk customer-relations@atoshealthcare.com Subject: My ESA(C) Case Dear Ms Guy NI Ref: ...Thank you for finally replying to my email of 27 May 2011. You will note that you have taken two days shy of two months in responding and once again failing to reply to the issues of substance. Perhaps my recent submission of evidence to the Prof Harrington Independent Review of the DWP WCA is a coincidence. Once again I am underwhelmed by what a reasonable person would conclude as neglect or incompetence or worse. Please write to me and explain the reasons for the delay. I would like to submit your justifications for the delay as additional evidence to Prof Harrington.
Regarding the DWP continued use of the terms "customer" or "client", I have noted and considered legal opinion on the fallacious argument that people are more familiar with "customer" and "client" than they are with "claimant". "Claimant" has been in used for many generations. The use of the unjustifiable terms "customer" or "client" belittles my medical condition, insults my intelligence and ignores my inalienable rights under Commmon and Statute Law to be treated with dignity and respect. Therefore I require you to cease and desist your harassment of me by using the terms "customer" or "client". I further require you to comply with the Legislation and the Contract and use "claimant". If the DWP feels differently it can petition for Parliament to provide clarification and it is then up to Parliament to redefine the term "customer", though I suggest this would have widespread consequences not least amendments to the "Sale of Goods" Act and the "Companies" Act. Clearly this matter is one that could be subject to Judicial Review but the costs of this would not be welcome to taxpayers or petitioners.
Notwithstanding the above, I am pleased that after around two years and two months the DWP and Atos have at long last decided to comply with the Legislation and the Contract between the DWP (the Customer) and Atos (the Contractor). I take this as an implicit admission that the DWP and Atos has failed to comply afore now.
One issue outstanding is compensation for which I will accept a figure of two thousand (£2,000) GBP. If you take into account the injuries to my person, the defamation by libel (the ESA85), which resulted in financial loss, the delays and errors, the worry, the submission of evidence to Parliament and Parliamentary Inquiry and Review, and the costs associated with my website in particular the publication of pertinent parts of the Contract allowing other claimants to know their rights. The DWP and Atos have in their correspondence implicitly admitted liability. My claim is reasonable considering the compensation awarded in similar cases in the High Court.
However, I am willing to waive my claim to compensation if you can confirm that the DWP, in accordance with the Contract, has removed approval from Nurse Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrews (PIN 97C0338E) whose case was considered by the NMC on 11 May 2011, and has removed approval from Dr Ludmila Semetillo (GMC number: 6165133), who libelled me. You should note the GMC comment that it is up to employers, the DWP in this case, to take action. Please can you further confirm that the DWP is reviewing all cases that these two have been involved in.
Regardless of the above I will publish, as a public service, the names of Nurse Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrews, Dr Ludmila Semetillo and Dr Ilias Macheridis on my website so that other claimants can be warned of how they have carried out their duties in my case. However I am willing to grant these two and others who have been named on my website, including yourself, the right to be published on my website. I am expecting apologies or justifications for the actions taken.
Finally my website will remain as a damning indictment to how the DWP and Atos treated the dying, the sick, the disabled and their carers. I expect history, reviewing this evidence, will look back at this time and regard the DWP and Atos as we now regard the Poor Law, Workhouses and those who worked in them. Shame on you all.
I look forward to the DWP reply.
Yours sincerely Mr B... Copy to: Darra Singh, Chief executive of Jobcentre Plus, DWP. Teresa Chammings, District Jobcentre Plus, Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire. Customer Relations Atos Healthcare.
Letter confirming that the DWP will in future use claimant in correspondence. The DWP make the outrageous claim that they have no jurisdiction over Atos Healthcare employees. I am speechless at the ignorance of DWP managers. The Contract states that the DWP can remove any Nurse and Doctor be removed from the approval list. What training do these ignorant managers receive?
Department for Work and Pensions Office of the District Manager Beauver House 6 Bricket Road St Albans AL1 3JU Tel: 01727 773312 www.dwp.gov.uk Our ref: .. 12 August 2011Dear Mr B...
Thank you for your email of 31 July to Anita Guy. It has been passed to me for reply as District Manager for Jobcentre Plus in Bedfordshire and Herrfordshire. I also responded to your previous correspondence and apologise for the delay in sending that response. While we aim to meet our 10 day target for responding to correspondence, it is not always possible and I am sory that we did not meet the target in your case.
I acknowledge that you do not like to be referred to as a 'customer' or 'client'. We have been using these terms for many years as the nature of our business has evolved and we now work more closely with individuals to help them return to work. We have noted that you wish to be referred to as a claimant however, please note that any ' automatically produced letters sent to you will not include this term of address.
With regards to our working relationship with other groups such as Atos Healthcare please be assured that processes are continuously monitored so that changes can be made if the need arises.
In your email you mention compensation of £2000. In order to consider this matter you will have to provide more information of the reasons you have requested this. We will then be happy to consider your request. Please note that we cannot help you with the costs of your website. We also have no jurisdiction over Atos Healthcare employees. Atos Healthcare is independent from the Department for Work and Pensions.
I hope this letter has helped to clarify these matters. If you require any further information, Andrea Wood, Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire District Correspondence Team at St Albans will be pleased to help. Andrea can be contacted by post at Jobcentre Plus, ODM, Ascot Road, Watford WD99 1AU, by telephone on 01727 773312 or by email at andrea.wood1@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk.
If you feel that my reply fails to address the issues you raise satisfactorily, please contact Darra Singh. Chief Executive of Jobcentre Plus. Darra, or a Director of Jobcentre Plus. will then review your issues as this is the next stage of our complaints process. Darra can be contacted by post at Jobcentre Plus, Level 6, Caxton House, Tothill Street, London. SW1H 9NA, by telephone on 0207 8293364 or by email at darra.singh@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk.
Yours sincerely
Teresa Chammings District Manager Jobcentre Plus Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire
Email to the DWP replying to their letter of the 12 August 2011.
To: andrea.wood1@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk CC: teresa.chammings@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk darra.singh@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk customer-relations@atoshealthcare.com Subject: My ESA(C) Case Dear Ms Wood NI Ref: ...WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Thank you for your letter dated 12 August. It is shocking that you are so insensitive to this claimant by apologising letter after letter for your failure to meet the ten day target. Please review the voluminous correspondence between the DWP and this claimant. I cannot recall when you have achieved this target. An apology is meaningless if there is no intent in meeting the target. Companies who have real customers pay compensation when failing to meet a published target. The DWP seems to pretend to itself that it has customers but seems to be bereft of what customer service means. This claimant, who, unlike a true customer, has only one option and must have his claim processed by the DWP puts the underwhelming DWP performance down to either ignorance, incompetence or negligence. In the private sector this is invariably the result of poor management. I am not qualified to speculate about public sector management.
I note that the DWP has agreed with my legal argument and will refer to me as "claimant" in future. This is a precendent. I am pleased I have established, and the DWP has accepted, this principle. I expect future revisions to standard documents to only use "claimant". I am pleased that the DWP is so organised that it dates each revision and publishes this on each document. This will ease the task of auditing.
I have no interest in the monitoring of Atos Healthcare processes. My interest is that the DWP conforms to NAO procedures in particular to the NAO procedure for the Independent Tier process and Atos Healthcare conforms to the Contract and produces all the management reports as listed and that the DWP audits closely Atos Healthcare. Note in earlier correspondence the DWP clearly says it declines to audit Atos Healthcare. The audit reports are not available through Freedom of Information requests. Thus the DWP fails to comply with the Contract and thus fails to audit. Please check before you make such false claims.
I have been denied payments due, including the Christmas payment, by the DWP and Atos. The DWP and Atos should be both able to read the Contract and read that for a brain tumour the claimant's GP and consultants should be consulted before deciding whether a face to face meeting is necessary. The DWP publish reports on the medical conditions of claimants. Why did the DWP DM not pick up on this? Why did Atos behave as it did?
I cannot believe the DWP has the gall to state that the DWP has no jurisdiction over Atos Healthcare employees. Read the Contract. The DWP MUST approve every Atos doctor and every Atos nurse. The DWP can remove approval. In my case there was a nurse who failed to read and a doctor who failed to read, then made things worse by carrying out an assessment thereby assaulting me and finally produced a nonsensical libellous report which resulted in me not being placed in the Support Group. What stronger grounds can there be for the DWP to remove approval from this nurse and doctor.
Please note my case is being considered by the Independent Case Examiner.
Finally I would like to inform the DWP that due to my exceptional medical condition and my short life expectancy, under scheme rules, a company pension scheme I have contributed to has decided to award me with a pension of £15,068.88 per annum. This is to be backdated to 14 April 2011. I expect I will receive the first payment in a couple of months. The DWP and Atos should note the pension scheme medical advisor contacted my GP and consultants. Please can you let me know if this pension affects the DWP ESA(C) Support Group payments that I currently receive.
I look forward to the DWP reply.
Yours sincerely Mr B... Copy to: Darra Singh, Chief Executive of Jobcentre Plus, DWP. Teresa Chammings, District Manager Jobcentre Plus, Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire. Customer Relations Atos Healthcare.
Letter from the DWP confirming a change in allowance. As I am in the ESA(C) Support Group I am eligible to be paid the £10 Christmas bonus. Yet another four pages of top quality paper printed on one side.
The letter is substantially the same as that published above 29 July 2009 (Work Capable), 9 February 2010(Work Capable), 8 May 2010(Support Group), 8 February 2011(Support Group), et al.
Letter from the DWP dated 9 September containing an apology for misleading information.
Department for Work and Pensions Office of the District Manager Beauver House 6 Bricket Road St Albans AL1 3JU Tel: 01727773312 www.dwp.gov.uk 9 September 2011 Dear Mr B...Thank you for your email of 24 August. Firstly, please accept my assurance that we do aim to meet our target for responding to correspondence however, as we cannot always accurately predict the volume of correspondence that we will receive, it is unfortunately not always possible.
In my letter of 12 August I have stated that we are happy to refer to you as a 'claimant' however, we have no current plans to change our terms of reference for other people who use our services. Our computer generated letters will still refer to those using our services as customers.
As my letter states, Jobcentre Plus works closely with Atos Healthcare who provide us with professional medical advice as we are not medically qualified. Our decision makers work with the information provided by Atos Healthcare; we do not influence Atos Healthcare as to whether they need to see an individual or not.
I apologise for the misleading information given in our previous letter concerning Atos Healthcare employees. The Chief Medical 0fficer, who is employed by the Department for Work and Pensions, does have to agree the appointments of the professional medical staff employed by Atos Healthcare. However, once employed the staff are required to meet Atos Healthcare's terms of employment and are subject to their internal disciplinay procedures.
Thank you for informing us about your private pension. from the information you provided I can confirm that this will affect your payments of Employment and Support Allowance. Please send confirmation of your pension details to Bonita Murphy, Employment and Support Allowance Team Manager at Luton Benefit Centre. Bonita will calculate your entitlement to benefit taking into consideration your new income.
I hope this letter has helped to clarify these matters, If you require any further information Bonita can be contacted by post at Luton Benefit Centre, Ascot Road, Watford WD99 1AB, by telephone on 01582 681310, or by email at bonita.murphy@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk.
If you feel that my reply fails to address the issues you raise satisfactorily, please contact Darra Singh, Chief Executive of Jobcentre Plus. Darra, or a Director of Jobcentre Plus, will then review your issues as this is the next stage of our complaints process. Darra can be contacted by post at Jobcentre Plus, Level 6, Caxton House, Tothill Street, London, SW1H 9NA, by telephone on 0207 8293364 or by email at darra.singh@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk.
Yours sincerely
Teresa Chammings District Manager Jobcentre Plus Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire
Email to the DWP accepting the apology for misleading information.
To: teresa.chammings@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk Cc: darra.singh@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk Date: 21 September 2011 16:39 Subject: My ESA(C) Support Group CaseDear Ms Chammings,
WITHOUT PREJUDICE
Thank you for your letter dated 9 September 2011.
In your third paragraph you state "we do not influence Atos Healthcare as to whether they need to see an individual or not". I remind you that the DWP and Atos Origin (trading as Atos Healthcare) has signed a Contract in which the medical conditions are defined and the actions that Atos should take are defined. You are aware of the multiple breaches of the Contract by Atos Healthcare in my case. There should be no question of "influence" but the DWP should enforce the Contract in full. The concept of "influence" is not defined and does not appear in the Contract and thus is non sequitor. The DWP decision makers should work with their contractor Atos and both should operate in compliance with the Contract. The clauses in the Contract are not optional and are not subject to the arbitrary whims of either party. If a claimant is subject to arbitrary actions then this may be a human rights issue.
I accept your apology for providing misleading information. It is well known that organisations reflect the qualities of the leaders of an organisation. Your ignorance speaks volumes. Consider the number of decisions overturned at appeal. A private industry maxim is "work smarter not harder". If the DWP fails to publish on the DWP website the main clauses of the Contract and if it fails to provide the Contract to decision makers then the DWP will create a torrent of work and many dying, sick, disabled and their carers will suffer. Hopefully few will suffer the physical abuse I received due to the incompetence of the DWP and in particular from Atos Origin (trading as Atos Healthcare).
I am concerned that you, as the District Manager, and the DWP decision makers appear to be ignorant of the important clauses in the Contract. The Contract defines actions which need to be taken by the decision makers. No medical knowledge is required for these actions. My ESA50 form stated my medical condition as a brain tumour. The Contract states that my GP should have been consulted prior to deciding whether a face to face assessment was necessary. A DWP decision maker should have read if the ESA85 is written to the standard of English defined in the Contract. The Contract lays a duty on the DWP decision maker to protect the claimant from abuse or arbitrary actions. I was abused by Atos Healthcare and was subject to arbitary action. In my case the DWP decision maker failed in their duty to me and you, as manager, failed and continues to fail to meet your obligations as set out in the Contract. Every DWP decision maker should have a copy of the Contract at hand to be aware of their duties. I have published the extracts of the Contract as obtained under FOI. See (http://www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatoscontract.html)
Now that you are familiar with the Contract, I would like you to recommend to the Chief Medical Officer that approval be removed from Nurse Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrews, from Dr Ludmila Semetillo and from Dr Ilias Macheridis. You should be familiar with the reasons. A summary follows: The NMC found Nurse Mrs Tanya Catherine Andrews failed to read the ESA50 and failed to hand the ESA50 to a doctor. Dr Ludmila Semetillo carried out an illegal assessment as she did not first contact my GP or consultants. The standard of English of Dr Ludmila Semetillo and Dr Ilias Macheridis is below the standard defined in the Contract. See (http://www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatosformesa85.html) and (http://www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatosformib59a.html).
I remind you that I have not received the compensation sum that has been discussed.
Regarding my private pensions, when I have all the details I will inform Ms Murphy. I understand that the ESA(C) payment will be reduced dependent on the size of the pension. I presume, as my GP and Consultants have confirmed I can never work again, I will continue to be classified as being eligible for ESA(C) and all this means in respect of my NI contributions, other rights and benefits. I am happy to continue to comply with the annual ESA(C) assessment process.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely
Email to the DWP with company pension details.
To: bonita.murphy@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk Date: 11 October 2011 16:37 Subject: Company PensionDear Ms Murphy,
NI Ref: ...
I refer you to the letter dated 9 September 2011 from Ms Teresa Chammings, District Manager, Jobcentre Plus, Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire and my email reply dated 21 September 2011.
See http://www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatosletters.html#DWP20110909F See http://www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatosletters.html#DWP20110921EI attach copies of letters I have received regarding my company pension.
Due to my exceptional medical circumstances I have been granted a pension now rather than having to wait until my specified retirement. Does it follow that I am eligible for a state pension now? As you may be aware the life expectancy of an adult with a brain tumour is nine months; figures from the Secretary for Health as reported to Parliament. I am fifty four and have survived two and a half years from diagnosis. I have letters from my doctors that state I am unable to work again. Can you confirm when I am eligible for the state pension (I have a full NI contribution record)?
I understand that even if I receive no further weekly payment from the DWP (due to limit rules), I will still be classified within the ESA(C) Support Group and thus eligible for special payments such as the Christmas payment. I am happy to comply with the annual ESA(C) Support Group assessment.
Please can you supply me with your calculations in full supported by the relevant clauses in Statutory Instruments; Acts, Rules and Regulations.
Thank you.
Yours sincerely
Letter from the DWP dated 14 October detailing rate changes. ESA change in rates to £99.85 + £10.00 (Christmas).
YOUR CLAIM FOR EMPLOYMENT AND SUPPORT ALLOWANCE CHANGES IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND SUPPORT ALLOWANCE RATES PAYABLE ... standard letter as previous
Letter from the DWP dated 17 October detailing calculation. ESA change in rates to £99.85 + £10.00 (Christmas).
Department for Work and Pensions Luton Benefit Centre Ascot Road WATFORD WD99 1AB Tel: 0845 608 8627 Text phone: 0845 608 8551 Date: 17 October 2011 www.direct.gov.uk Dear Mr B...Your Employment and Support Allowance Claim - NI No: ....
Thank you for your email of 11 October notifying us of your occupational pension. You have also asked for confirmation about claiming a State Pension.
We have checked the guidance for State Pensions on the website www.direct.gov.uk. This says that the earliest you can get the basic State Pension is when you reach State Pension age.
Currently, the State Pension age for men is 65. However, new proposals to increase the State Pension age are currently going through Parliament in the Pensions Bill. These proposals are not yet law and still require the approval of Parliament. It is these proposals that the government is amending to slow down the State Pension age increase.
The proposed changes will affect you as you were born between 6 April 1953 and 5 April 1960. The proposed changes will mean that you reach state pension age on your 66th birthday.
For more information about this and about how much you will be entitled to, please telephone the State Pension enquiry line on 0800 731 7898 (8am to 8pm, Monday to Friday). You can also get further information about Pensions and retirement planning on www.direct.gov.uk.
Your pension from ... is payable from 14 April, with the first payment being issued on 12 October. This first payment includes October's pension and arrears from 14 April to 12 September. We have calculated the five months arrears to equate to £1398.05 a month (£6990.29 divided by 5).
Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) regulations state that we should allocate arrears payments forward for the equivalent period into the future. Therefore, for the five months from October to February 2012 , we will take one month of the arrears together with the actual pension paid for that month as your income from your pension.
ESA Regs, reg 93(1)9B); 2 reg 91(2) (a) & (b) and ESA Regs, reg 93(1); 2 SS A Act 92, s 74.
We have calculated the income from your pension for October to February 2012 as:
Monthly pension £1255.74 One month of arrears + £1398.05 £2653.79From March 2012, only the pension due for that month will be the income from your pension.
We currently disregard the first £85 of your gross weekly pension. We call this amount the Pension Income Threshold and we deduct 50% of any gross pension income that exceeds the threshold from your ESA.
We will extinguish payment of your contributory ESA if your pension income deduction is equal to or greater than your total amount of ESA. If we extinguish payment because of pension income, this will not affect your limited capability for work and being in the Support Group, as you will still have an entitlement to National Insurance credits. You will still be entitled to the annual Christmas bonus.
ESA Regs, reg 106(2)g); 2 reg 109(1), ESA Regs, reg 2(1), WR Act 07, s 2(1)(c) & s 3; ESA Regs, reg 74(1)
We have calculated your pension income as a weekly amount as follows:
From 12 October to 11 March: Monthly pension £1255.74 One month of arrears + £1398.05 £2653.79 x 12 divided by 52 = £612.41 - £ 85.OO disregard £527.41 x 50% = £263.70Your contributory ESA entitlement is £99.85 a week. Your pension income exceeds this entitlement and so we have extinguished your contributory ESA payments to 11 March.
From 12 March: Monthly pension £1255.74 x 12 divided by 52 = £289.87 - £ 85.00 disregard £204.87 x 50% = £102.39Your pension income still exceeds your contributory ESA entitlement and extinguishes your contributory ESA payments from 12 March.
I hope this letter has helped to clarify these matters. If you require any further information, Bonita, an Employment Support Allowance Customer Service Manager at Luton Benefit Centre will be pleased to help. You can contact Bonita by post at the address at the top of this letter or by telephone on 01582 681310.
Yours sincerely
Stuart Fraser
Employment Support Allowance Manager
This letter confirms that I do not receive State Pension until the State Pension age. It confirms that due to my company pension amount exceeding the threshold my ESA weekly payments will cease. I will continue to receive any special amounts such as the Christmas £10.00 payment. I will continue to be included in the ESA(C) Support Group and my NI contributions will continue to be paid by the DWP.
Letter from the DWP detailing the rate changes following company pension. ESA change in rates to £0.00 + £10.00 (Christmas).
YOUR CLAIM FOR EMPLOYMENT AND SUPPORT ALLOWANCE CHANGES IN THE EMPLOYMENT AND SUPPORT ALLOWANCE RATES PAYABLE ... standard letter as previous
All that is outstanding are matters such as apologies, explanations, a medical report and compensation. These are in the hands of the Independent Case Examiner (http://www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatoslettersgov.html#ICE).
Email informing the DWP concerning non-payment of my Christmas bonus.
As Darra Singh OBE left the DWP in September 2001, I received a automated acknowledgement that the email was forwarded to Terry Moran, Chief Operating Officer for the Department for Work and Pensions.
To: stuart.fraser@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk darra.singh@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk Subject: Luton BDC Failure to pay ESA(C) Christmas bonus Mr Stuart Fraser Employment Support Allowance Manager ESA - Jobcentre Plus Luton BDC, Ascot Road, Watford WD99 1ABDear Mr Fraser
NI Ref: ...
Further to your letter dated 17 October 2011 in which you stated "...this will not affect your limited capability for work and being in the Support Group, as you will still have an entitlement to National Insurance credits. You will still be entitled to the annual Christmas bonus..."
I believe that I have not yet received the annual Christmas bonus.
Please could you investigate this matter, take remedial action and provide me with a detailed explanation for how this error could have occurred. My concern is that the DWP has removed me, ultra vires, from the ESA Support Group ignoring the assurance you gave me in your 17 Ocotber 2011 letter.
I would like you to copy this letter to your manager and point out that the Select Committee for Work and Pensions has expressed interest in reviewing actual examples such as this which provides insights into the capabilities and competence of management control and audit within organisational units of the DWP.
I look forward to receiving a speedy reply. Thank you.
Another example of the incompetence of the organisation that reflects the values or neglect or incompetence of Darra Singh OBE who fortunately left the DWP in September 2011. "Good riddance to bad rubbish as we used to say."
Poor judgment by Yvette Cooper the then Secretary of State for Work and Pensions in the Labour Government who appointed Darra Singh OBE 31 July 2009. As she said at the time "I am delighted that we have been able to appoint someone of Darra Singh's experience and ability...".
Notwithstanding the lack of achievements of Darra Singh OBE at the DWP, Ernst & Young in December 2011 have appointed Darra Singh OBE as an Executive Director within its Government and Public Sector team specifically Director of the local public services team. A press release states "...In his new role he will advise local government clients on how to achieve more efficient and enhanced public services...".
Darra Singh OBE is the man responsible for the massive overspend to Atos, the massive increase in numbers of appeals, reported DWP fraud at the tiny level 0.5% and yet allowed and extended "benefit scrounger" campaigns in defiance of the Select Committee and common sense.
If I worked for Ernst & Young local public services team, ... no I would never work for Darra Singh OBE given his poor record at the DWP JobcentrePlus.
Letter confirming that the DWP was at fault.
Department for Work and Pensions Luton Benefit Centre, Ascot Road, WATFORD WD99 1AB Tel: 0845 608 8627 Text phone: 0845 608 8551 www.direct.gov.uk Date: 3 January 2012 Dear Mr B...Your Employment and Support Allowance Claim - NI No: ...
Thank you for your email of 29 December concerning the non-payment of your Christmas bonus.
We have investigated this matter and have reported the computer system fault that caused the non-payment. We cannot trace why this happened but we apologise that it did.
We have now made a local payment and the £10 Christmas Bonus payment will credit to your bank account by 9 January.
If you require any further information, Bonita, an Employment Support Allowance Customer Service Manager at Luton Benefit Centre will be pleased to help. You can contact Bonita by post at the address at the top of this letter or by telephone on 01582 681310.
We have copied this reply to Teresa Chammings, District Manager for Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire Jobcentre Plus.
Yours sincerely
Stuart Fraser, Employment Support Allowance Manager
Letter informing me that ESA payments are due to end because I am not in the ESA Support Group. This is yet another DWP gross error.
Your reference is ... Please tell us this number if you get in touch with us Basildon Benefit Centre Winsford Way Chelmsford Essex SS14 1JEDate 9 April 2012
Dear Mr B...
YOUR CLAIM FOR EMPLOYMENT AND SUPPORT ALLOWANCE
Contribution-based Employment and Support Allowance is due to end
Our records show you have been getting contribution-based Employment and Support Allowance.
This is due to end on 30 April 2012. This is because you will have received a total of 365 days contribution-based Employment and Support Allowance which the law says is the maximum number of days you can receive this benefit for, unless you are in the support group.
Based on the information held on your current award of benefit, when your contribution-based Employment and Support Allowance ends you will not receive any money. We will continue to credit you with National Insurance contributions. These credits can help you to qualify for benefits in the future, including your State Pension.
In order to continue being credited with National Insurance contributions you may be required to provide medical evidence or attend Work Capability Assessments. We will tell you if you need to do this.
I appreciate you will be concerned about what this means for you and will want to know what happens next.
You may still be able to get Employment and Support Allowance if you do not have enough money to live on. Income-related Employment and Support Allowance may be payable if you have a low household income. This may be affected by income or capital you receive and is not usually payable if
you have a partner working 24 hours or more a week, or
you or your partner have savings and investments over £16,000
If you want to be assessed for income-related Employment and Support Allowance please contact us on the number at the top of this letter and ask about income-related Employment and Support Allowance.
If you would like to know more about other benefits you may be entitled to please visit www.direct.gov.uk/benefits or contact us on the number at the top of this letter.
Remember, you must tell us if any of your circumstances change. This includes any changes to your partner's circumstances, if you have a partner.
Yours sincerely
Susan Murray, Manager
Letter explaining to the DWP that they had made yet another mistake. I emailed Susan Murry (susan.murray@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk) but this email address was not recognised.
Dear Ms Bonita Murphy,
It looks like the DWP has made yet another error. I will post the letter to Susan Murray as soon as I can. Please can you sort this matter once and for all.
Yours underwhelmed again
The attached letter:
Ms Susan Murray Jobcentre Plus Basildon Benefit Centre Winsford Way, Chelmsford, Essex SS14 1JE12 April 2012
Dear Ms Murray
NI Ref: ....
Further to your letter dated 9 April 2012, I refer you to the letter from Mr Stuart Fraser, ESA Manager, DWP Luton Benefit Centre dated 17 October 2011 and previous correspondence including the letters from Teresa Chammings, District Manager Jobcentre Plus, Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire et al.
Your records are incorrect. As I do not live in Essex and have previously been dealt with by Bedfordshire and Hertfordshire I fail to understand why you should have access to records that relate to my case.
Notwithstanding the records you have accessed are incorrect. For your information I am in the ESA Support Group and as such the DWP should continue to credit me with National Insurance contributions. Furthermore my case is currently with the Independent Case Examiner.
I quote from the 17 October 2011 letter: "I hope this letter has helped to clarify these matters. If you require any further information, Bonita, an Employment Support Allowance Customer Service Manager at Luton Benefit Centre will be pleased to help. You can contact Bonita by post at the address at the top of this letter or by telephone on 01582 681310."
Please write to me to confirm that you agree that you have made a mistake and to confirm that you have corrected your records. In addition I suggest you copy your letter and reply to the Independent Case Examiner to explain why despite a cease and desist harassment notice the DWP continues to harass me.
I look forward to receiving a speedy reply. Thank you.
Yours sincerely
Email copies: bonita.murphy@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk, stuart.fraser@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk, teresa.chammings@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk
A phone message from Bonita informing me that Luton Benefit Centre is closed. She is working in the Luton Jobcentre Plus Office. I paraphrase:
This is Bonita from the Luton Jobcentre Plus regarding my letter. She would like to explain that Luton Benefit Centre is closed. Basildon Benefit Centre is taking over. I can phone her on 01582 545702.
Of course I did not phone back. I will wait for the letter from Basildon.
It is another expected ploy by the DWP. If the DWP moves a case from one office to another, I am not vain enough to believe just because of my case Luton was closed, the DWP can claim "it is the fault of the numpties at Luton" and the DWP is happy to report the DWP has cut out the wormwood...blah...blah...blah.
Unfortunately for the DWP, Basildon has taken over and its first action is a gross error. An organisation reflects the competence or incompetence of its leader, previously Darra Singh who has gone on to highly paid employment by a leading management consultant to provide advice to the Government. Was it forever thus?
We will see whether the DWP meets the ten day target for responding to a letter.
Certificate of Pay and Taxable Benefit and Tax Deducted/Refunded Previous employment: ... ... Pay £ 0.00 Tax £ 0.00 Year to 2012 Deducted 5 April benefit for Total £ 2706.79 Taxable £ 2706.79 Tax £ 0.00 current claim Pay and £ 2706.79 Net tax £ 0.00 Tax Taxable Deducted District ... benefit number PAYE reference ESA500 Final tax code 757L X National Insurance no. ... Date of issue 21/04/12 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Benefit ... File .. Print ... Office Indicator control P60U Issued by the BA/DSS Please read the notes overleaf Notes for Claimants Do not destroy For more information see leaflet IR41 which you can get from any tax or benefit office 1 Jobseekers Allowance is subject to tax. 2. This form shows details of benefit and tax paid up to 5 April. It will help you to check your tax assessment or to fill in your tax return if you are sent either of these. Keep your P60U in a safe place as you cannot get another one. 3. If you think the amount of taxable benefit is wrong ask the benefit office for an explanation at once. If you are not satisfied, you have 60 days from the date of this certificate to make an objection, in writing, giving your reasons. If You do not object in writing within 60 days you cannot question the amount of taxable benefit later. 4. If you have any questions about your tax affairs ask your tax office. If however you have a query about taxable benefit get in touch with your benefit office.
Department for Work and Pensions Jobcentre Plus Basildon Benefit Centre Winsford Way Chelmsford Essex CM98 1AD www.directgov.co.uk Our ref: ... Date: 30 April 2012Dear Mr B...
Thank you for your email dated 12 April to Bonita Murphy. This was referred to me in my capacity as the Customer Services Team Manager at the Basildon Benefit Centre to reply to.
Due to the complexity of your communication I am sending you an interim response. A full explanation will be issued to you shortly. While we are investigating I would recommend that you disregard any further letters we issue about your Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) payments ending on 30 April.
In the meantime if you have any questions please contact me via the Customer Services Team's email address: BasildonBDC.TASCS@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk. My telephone number is 01268 633061 and my postal address is the one at the top of this letter.
Yours sincerely.
Maggie Brown, Customer Services Team Manager
History repeating.
This was received on the 3 May 2012.
Department for Work and Pensions Jobcentre Plus Basildon Benefit Centre Winsford Way Chelmsford Essex CM98 1AD www.directgov.co.uk Our ref: ... Date: 30 April 2012Dear Mr B...
YOUR CLAIM FOR EMPLOYMENT AND SUPPORT ALLOWANCE
Contribution-based Employment and Support Allowance has ended
Our records show that you have been getting contribution-based Employment and Support Allowance.
This ended on 30 April 2012. This is because you have received a total of 365 days contribution-based Employment and Support Allowance which the law says is the maximum number of days you can receive this benefit for, unless you are in the support group.
You no longer get contribution-based Employment and Support Allowance. We will continue to credit you with National Insurance contributions, These credits can help you to qualify for benefits in the future, including your State Pension.
In order to continue being credited with National Insurance contributions you may be required to provide medical evidence or attend Work Capability Assessments. We will tell you if you need to do this.
You may still be able to get Employment and Support Allowance if you do not have enough money to live on. Income-related Employment and Support Allowance may be payable if you have a low household income. This may be affected by income or capital you receive and is not usually payable if
You have a partner working 24 hours or more a week; or
You or your partner have savings and investments over £16,000
If you want to be assessed for income-related Employment and Support Allowance please contact us on the number at the top of this letter and ask about income-related Employment and Support Allowance.
If you would like to know more about other benefits you may be entitled to please visit www.direct.gov.uk/benefits or contact us on the number at the top of this letter.
Remember, you must tell us if any of your circumstances change. This includes any changes to your partner's circumstances, if you have a partner.
QUESTIONS YOU MIGHT HAVE ABOUT OUR DECISION
If you want to know more about this decision or you think the decision is wrong.
Please get in touch with us, by phone or in writing, within one month of the date of this letter. If you contact us later we may not be able to help you. Our address and phone number are on the front page of this letter.
You, or someone else who has authority to act on your behalf, can
ask for an explanation
ask for a written statement of reasons for our decision
ask us to look again at the decision to see if it can be changed. There may be some facts you think we have overlooked or you may have more information which affects the decision.
appeal against the decision. Please see below for more information.
You can do any of the actions listed above, or you can do all of them.
You can find more information about decision making and appeals in leaflet GL24 "If you think our decision is wrong".
What happens if you ask us to look at the decision again?
If we can change the decision, we will send you a new decision. You will have one month from the date of that letter to appeal if you still disagree with the decision.
If we cannot change the decision, we will send you a letter telling you why. You will have one month from the date of that letter to appeal if you still disagree with the decision.
PLEASE KEEP THIS LETTER FOR YOUR INFORMATION
It will help us if you have this letter when you make any enquiries or need an explanation about the decision.
I appreciate that you may have concerns about this decision; please contact us on the number at the top of the letter if you would like to discuss this with us.
Yours sincerely
Susan Murray, Manager
To: BasildonBDC.TASCS@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk Subject: Yet more errors by the DWP.Dear Ms Maggie Brown, Customer Services Team Manager,
NI: ...
Thank you for your letter dated 30 April 2012. Today I received a letter dated 30 April 2012 "YOUR CLAIM FOR EMPLOYMENT AND SUPPORT ALLOWANCE" from Susan Murray, Manager confirming my ESA(C) has ended on 30 April 2012 and I had one month to contact the DWP. Again Ms Murray claimed that she had consulted my records. I presume this is the sort of letter that you asked me to ignore.
If you check my record in person and find I am indeed in the Support Group I suggest capability or disciplinary actions should be taken against Ms Murray. If it is neither Ms Murray or yourself to blame I suggest you investigate who at the DWP was at fault. Gross incompetence at the DWP does not help the reputation of the DWP and much worse it hurts the dying, sick, disabled and their carers.
It appears from your letter that the DWP has mislaid my records. This would be in breach of the Data Protection Act and may be something that should be referred to the Information Commissioner's Office for independent investigation. It reinforces my conviction that the word (phone message) of the DWP cannot be trusted and that a claimant needs to always insist on an email or a letter.
I am sure the ICO would agree with me that there should be no difficulty or delay in looking up my record and confirming that I am in the ESA(C) support group. An interim letter should not be necessary. A reasonable person might conclude that your interim holding letter may be seen as the latest example of equivocation and evasion by the DWP.
I would like you to note that I have published most of the correspondence I have had with the DWP and Atos on my website see http://www.whywaitforever.com/dwpatosletters.html. If you review this web page you will see I received DWP "YOUR CLAIM FOR EMPLOYMENT AND SUPPORT ALLOWANCE" letters on 17 October 2011, 14 October 2011, 8 February 2011, 5 May 2010, 9 February 2010 et al. In addition I did NOT receive my ten GBP Christmas payment until I queried the matter in January 2012 after which it was promptly paid (software error I was told). In reviewing these dates I did not receive the DWP "YOUR CLAIM FOR EMPLOYMENT AND SUPPORT ALLOWANCE" in February 2012 which I believe I should have received. Why was this when in January 2012 the DWP agreed I was in the Support Group?
From experience I know how many months and years a DWP investigation can take. I ask you by return to email me a confirmation that either I am in the ESA(C) Support Group or that the DWP has lost my record.
I look forward to hearing from you BY RETURN.
Yours sincerely,
This was received on the 25 May 2012.
Department for Work and Pensions Jobcentre Plus Basildon Benefit Centre Winsford Way Chelmsford Essex CM98 1AD www.directgov.co.uk Our ref: ... Date: 22 May 2012Dear Mr B...
Further to my letter to you dated 3O April 2012 I am writing to you with an update about your Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) claim and the questions you raised. I can also acknowledge receipt of your email sent on 4 May.
I can confirm that you are in the ESA Support Group and that your ESA payments have not ceased from 3O April 2012 as our letter dated 9 April informed you. We raised this with our advice line and are continuing to investigate why this letter was issued. This is an ESA computer system incident which does not stem from the loss of your ESA records.
You were awarded an occupational pension from UK Power Networks last October. This and the income from your Friends Life pension exceeded your weekly ESA rate for the remainder of the 2011/12 year (99.85) from 13 October 2011. However as a result of the annual uprating of benefits exercise (conducted annually in April) your ESA rate increased to £105.05 from 12 April 2012 and we have started to pay you a small amount of ESA.
As of today you have been paid ESA up to and including 9 May. Your next payment is due to clear into your account on 23 May. I have enclosed a pre-paid reply envelope for you to confirm if your pension payments will or have increased in the 2012/2013 financial year. This is so that we can confirm we are paying you the correct rate of ESA. If you do not have the information we require I would be grateful if you could give us signed authority to approach your pension providers.
The Benefit Centre address and manager details on your recent letters are correct. DWP regularly reviews its benefit processing capacity and the sites which undertake this work. Responsibility for administering their ESA claims was transferred to the Basildon Benefit Centre earlier this year. Amendments have been made to the ESA computer system so that the office address and manager details on our letters display the Basildon Benefit Centre details.
If you have any questions please contact me via the Customer Services Team's email address: BasildonBDC.TASCS@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk. My telephone number is 01268 633061 and my postal address is the one at the top of this letter. Please note that we are unable to reply to you in detail by email.
Yours sincerely,
Maggie Brown, Customer Services Team Manager
To: BasildonBDC.TASCS@jobcentreplus.gsi.gov.uk Subject: Response to your letter dated 22 May 2012.Dear Ms Maggie Brown, Customer Services Team Manager,
NI: ...
Thank you for your letter dated 22 May 2012. I appreciate your confirmation that once again the DWP has failed me and for what ever the reason the DWP, for a time, did not have access to my records and as a consequence acted negligently and without due diligence and consideration. In short it appears that DWP quality procedures failed to detect this gross error.
I would like you to provide me with a full and complete explanation of the circumstances once your investigations have been completed. I would like you to provide me with the software incident reference identifiers for this incident and for the previous software incident which resulting in the failure of the DWP to pay me the Christmas 10 GBP. This previous failure by Luton clearly should have flagged up that there was a problem. Why was no action taken? Who failed me? I reserve the right to forward the information you provide to the Independent Case Examiner and the Information Commissioner's Office for their opinion.
Regarding my pensions. In April 2012 the ... pension was increased to ... GBP per year (... per month). The ... pension is fixed and will never increase.
I do NOT grant the DWP the authority to approach my pension providers on the understandable grounds that as the DWP has failed in their duty of care under the Data Protection act to protect my records I have no confidence in the ability of the DWP to act on my behalf without my oversight.
I look forward to hearing from you.
Yours sincerely,
After two years and two months the DWP and Atos have conceded the field. For all this time they left me dangling like a condemned man. I summed the feeling during this time as "A fronte praecipitium a tergo lupi" (between the devil and the deep blue sea). The literal translation is "to the front the high cliff and behind the wolves". It sounds better in Latin.
Outstanding are secondary matters; compensation and referral to the Independent Case Examiner (again).
The single letter dated 25 July 2011 should have been written at the start in 2009. Then it should have stated words to the effect "...your medical condition is listed as one requiring the DWP to refer to your GP and or Consultants. This we are progressing. In the meantime we are paying you the benefit as per your claim but please be aware that we may ask you to refund the benefit if your medical condition is not verified...".
It is for the Attorney General or the National Audit Office or the Parliamentary and Health Services Ombudsman to consider if, under Administrative Law, an abuse of process has taken place in the implementation of the Welfare Reform Act and other referenced Acts and Regulations.
It is for the DWP to consider a case can be made to take Atos Healthcase to the High Court for breach of the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare.
It is for the GMC to consider whether there is evidence of malpractice by GMC registered Healthcare professionals who work for Atos Healthcare. Patients and carers need to complain about these individuals.
Eventually, after all complaints and appeals processes have been exhausted, it is for patients and carers to take the named directors, Mark Bounds, Managing Director and David Wright Chief Medical Officer of Atos Healthcare to the High Court for compensation in respect of loss and actual hurt. In my legal layman's view, I would look for a nominal sum of £50. for each item of correspondence. I would look at a compensation rate of three times my daily rate when I was at my peak as an IT Consultant for the days it took me to recover after the abuse of care I received from Atos Healthcare. In my opinion the Contract between the DWP and Atos Healthcare states clearly that Atos Healthcare would be the respondant in such cases and any such charges and costs that arise would not be able to be passed on to the DWP.
This is all true. You could not make up the incompetence of Atos Healthcare. I do feel there are stories here and that they are much more interesting than those based on the corporate or financial Enron or Madoff stories. People see themselves drowning in the Kaffka like situations. I admit that I do see the unfolding situation as a darkly comic "Waiting for Godot" except with less action.